Skip to main content

DOT says Ratner may be trying to stretch deadline past three years for completion of Carlton Avenue bridge

So, the first alarming thing about Forest City Ratner's contract with the city Department of Transportation (DOT) to rebuild the Carlton Avenue Bridge was the revelation, as I reported in January, that the developer had three years to complete the job without penalty, even though the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) produced by the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) disclosed the work would take two years.

(Photo by Jonathan Barkey)

Now the developer may be trying to stretch the deadline and thus avoid $10,000 a day penalties. How? A clause in the contract, signed 12/17/07, provides up to five years to complete the work in case of Unavoidable Delay. (Demolition began in January 2008.)

Among the definitions of Unavoidable Delay is a delay in "completing the Master Closing," which is defined as including the ESDC's exercise of eminent domain and the closing of a purchase and sale agreement with the MTA/LIRR for the Vanderbilt Yard.

Neither have been accomplished. And if an arena would not open until 2012, in the best-case scenario, that means Forest City Ratner might want to have four--nearly five--years to complete work on the bridge.

FCR's contract advantage

"They have reached out to us," David Woloch, the DOT's Deputy Commissioner of External Affairs, said at a meeting last night of the Council of Brooklyn Neighborhoods (CBN). "The essence of what's been suggested is that... if there's a delay in completing the Master Closing by the ESDC, that's an Unavoidable Delay."

"So basically what they're saying is, until ESDC takes the land, they're entitled to a time out?" asked Candace Carponter, co-chair of CBN, which was a plaintiff in a lawsuit challenging the environmental review. (Click on graphics to enlarge.)

I heard one "yes" from Woloch's group of four DOT officials, but Chris Hrones, Downtown Brooklyn Transportation Coordinator, said, "We're still working on that."

Legal barriers?

The state eminent domain case dismissed last week, Hrones said, was cited by FCR as "something that prevented them moving forward in their estimation, because it really put the project in doubt."

"Since that court case has been resolved, at least by the Appellate Division, I think we feel like, we'd like to get an explanation why they aren't proceeding," Hrones said, adding that DOT is seeking a meeting with the developer. "We definitely want some answers from them.

Carponter pointed out, however, that, when the demolition began in early 2008, eminent domain litigation had already been filed in federal court. (It was coordinated by Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn, for which she is legal chair.)

"If that's preventing them now," she said, "it should've been preventing them from taking it down in the first place" and inconveniencing people with a half-demolished bridge.

After all, as I noted last December, FCR officials twice said in court papers:
FCRC’s construction schedule has been carefully drawn to allow the arena to be ready... by commencing work now on vacant properties that are owned by FCRC, the MTA and the City, with work on properties that are owned or occupied by other parties deferred until the pending judicial challenges to the Project have proceeded to a point where ESDC is in a position to actually use its powers of eminent domain to acquire title to and possession of those properties.
(Emphasis added)

Still, the DOT may have only partial leverage. The contract's definition of Unavoidable Delay, noted above, provides "that Developer establishes to DOT that such litigation prevents Developer from proceeding with the Developer Work." 

But there doesn't appear to be such slack in the definition of Master Closing.

"We're going to try, on behalf of the city and on behalf of the taxpayers of the city, to make sure that, given this contract, we get the best deal out of it," Woloch said. "If they come to us and want X months to count as an Unavoidable Delay, and we don't think that's fair, then, we'll push back. We want to get the bridge open as quickly as possible."

Additional delay?

Beyond that, unmentioned at the meeting, there's additional contract language that allows reconstruction of the bridge to take more than five years if the "unavoidable delay directly and specifically precludes the Developer from Substantially Completing the Bridge."

In other words, there seem to be two levels of Unavoidable Delay--one a rather malleable term and one that means what it says.

Failure to communicate

Was the ESDC informed, when the FEIS was produced, about the potential for a 36-month closure?

DOT staffers responded that 36 months was supposed to be an outside bound, since the bridge could be reconstructed within two years.

I followed up: But was the ESDC informed, so it could be disclosed in the FEIS?

"As far as I know, not by DOT," Woloch said. "The negotiation was in the contract with Forest City.... They wanted a cushion."

While that's understandable, and probably not unusual in contract negotiations, the contract came after the FEIS was finished, and ESDC had no oversight role. 

If a post-FEIS contract can trump the information disclosed in the environmental review, what's the point of the ESDC review?

No timetable

Woloch said there's no current schedule for completion of the bridge, but "we have reached out recently" to try to find out.

"As much as some of us don't like this project, we also don't want it to happen badly," Carponter said. "Now, we've got a project we hate that's happening badly."

Fire Department, and notices

DOT officials were asked whether the Fire Department had cleared the closing of the bridge, given that a fire station is nearby on Dean Street. Joe Noto, executive director of the Office of Construction Mitigation and Coordination, said yes, and that Fire Department brass felt confident that response would not be hampered.

"Since the bridge closed, we haven't reached out for updates," he said, "but they haven't come to us" with complaints. Some community members, however, have said individual firefighters have indicated dismay at the closing.

Also, Hrones said that DOT would require five weeks notice before any major street, such as Fifth Avenue north of Flatbush Avenue, would be closed.

Replacement bridge, GPP

Could a temporary replacement for the Carlton Avenue Bridge be built, serving pedestrians and bicyclists? No, the group was told; it would cost $5 million and take two years to construct.

Is the DOT involved in plans to amend the ESDC's Modified General Project Plan, which may be coming in the next month or two? Not yet, the group was told.

Comments

  1. screw the cost.

    lest see


    google is your friend

    seach terms:

    bridge
    temporary
    pedestrian


    on 1st page:

    http://www.bridgeandrail.com/pedestrian-bridges.php


    http://www.bigrmfg.com/products/

    http://www.baileybridge.com/


    http://www.mitchellbridges.com/construction-bridges

    http://www.contech-cpi.com/bridges/products/truss/continental_bridges/341


    and, have costs tripled in the last 5 years?


    http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/05/nyregion/battery-park-residents-oppose-a-temporary-pedestrian-bridge.html

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.