Skip to main content

Why Atlantic Yards affordable housing will be long-delayed, and why ACORN can't complain

Despite the rhetoric, there are couple of important things to know about the promises regarding Atlantic Yards affordable housing.

First, should the project proceed, the housing will not be built on a schedule close to that originally promised.

Second, ACORN, signatory to the affordable housing Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and the Community Benefits, owes Forest City Ratner $1 million and is in no position to complain about delays.

Markowitz's claim

After news of the Atlantic Yards eminent domain ruling that emerged Friday, Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz asserted, "The unanimous ruling by the State Appellate Division once again affirms the numerous public benefits of the Atlantic Yards project—during these difficult economic times and into Brooklyn’s bright future—including the creation of affordable housing, solid union jobs, and permanent employment opportunities..."

Does it actually affirm those public benefits? The decision used vague locution from the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC):
The project is anticipated to create between 5,325 and 6,430 housing units, of which 2,250 are expected to be affordable for low- and middle-income families.

The project itself can't create anything. Someone has to put up the money and, guess what, the housing market isn't great and housing bonds are scarce.

Who's speculating?

The court stated:
The project also serves the additional public purposes of creating an arena, publicly accessible open space, affordable housing, improvements to public transit, and new job opportunities... The petitioners' argument that some of these public benefits may never actually be realized is conclusory and speculative.

Isn't it equally speculative to assert that some of the public benefits will in fact be realized?

The court said:
In contrast, while the petitioners in the instant proceeding question the true motivations of the public officials involved in the development of this project, they have offered no evidence that the public benefits which the project will allegedly promote or achieve are illusory, or that equivalent or greater public benefits would accrue absent the condemnation.

Well, there's evidence and there's argument. There was no opportunity in the court proceeding to have a duel of experts, as in eminent domain battles elsewhere. But no cost-benefit analysis was ever attempted by the state, which announced benefits without assessing costs.

FCR's claims

Forest City Ratner issued a statement quoting Bruce Ratner, “This significant victory keeps Atlantic Yards moving forward. It means that more affordable housing, jobs, the Nets and other sports and entertainment are that much closer to being a reality in Brooklyn.”

Ratner added, "The world has changed significantly since we announced this project in December 2003. But one thing has never changed -- Forest City’s commitment to bringing the Nets to Brooklyn and building an arena and residential community that will make the people of Brooklyn and the entire City proud.”

Also in the press release was this statement, "FCRC expects to start at least one residential building during the first phase of construction."

Well, one building does not make a residential community. Nor would it "create" much affordable housing.

(The Daily News, in an editorial today, blames "rabid obstructionists" for delaying the arena and housing the city needs, somehow neglecting to point out that Ratner is delaying the housing on his own. The Daily News also blames AY opponents and critics for denying the Nets a chance at superstar LeBron James, somehow neglecting to point out that James could sign a bigger contract with his current team, the Cleveland Cavaliers.)

Where's ACORN?

You'd think that ACORN, which put its political muscle behind the project in exchange for a pledge to construct 2250 subsidized apartments, might protest the fact that those units likely would take "decades" (to quote ESDC CEO Marisa Lago) to emerge, rather than the ten-year span promised when the project was approved in December 2006.

(Bonus prediction: then-Assemblyman Roger Green, a project supporter, in 2005, predicted the project would take 25-30 years.)

But, when ACORN signed the MOU in May 2005, it was contractually obligated to support the project.

Since then, ACORN has become much more indebted to Forest City Ratner. When the organization, in the wake of an embezzlement scandal, faced mounting debts and a decline in donations, the developer stepped in last August and bailed out ACORN with a $1 million loan and grants totaling $500,000.

For Forest City Ratner, it looks like a very good investment.

The Times still punts

And the developer has gotten a free ride from the press so far, as well.

Yesterday, New York Times Public Editor Clark Hoyt looked into charges, raised by ACORN whistleblower Anita MonCrief, that the newspaper ignored a "game-changing" article about ACORN's connections to the Obama campaign.

Hoyt called it The Tip That Didn't Pan Out. (The conservative blog PowerLine disagrees.)

But MonCrief's tip regarding ACORN and Forest City Ratner checked out completely. It was confirmed by ACORN's spokesman. ACORN is indebted to Forest CIty Ratner and, likely, muzzled. That's news.

Were promises ever realistic?

I wrote last week how there's no evidence that, before the project was approved, the ESDC considered the availability of sufficient housing bonds to construct the affordable housing.

I filed a Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request with the ESDC in December to see if any documents indicated such deliberations. Each month, I get the same response: they're still looking.

I just got my May response (right) this past weekend.
(Click to enlarge)


  1. The Daily News's rabid editorialist also conveniently neglects to mention that James's Cavaliers are currently 8-0 in this year's playoffs, while the Nets are home watching for the second year running. Maybe the fact that Bruce Ratner has been as good at building the Nets as he has been at building Atlantic Yards might factor in to LBJ's decision, no?

  2. Ratner certainly hasn't done a very good job of building the nets, but he's done a great job of destroying them.

    The nets won back-to-back eastern conference championships in 2002 & 2003, coming within 2 games of winning an nba championship the latter year.

    Ratner purchased the nets in early 2004, and it's been all downhill since.

    2004 ... 2nd round playoff exit

    2005 ... 1st round playoff exit

    2006 ... 2nd round playoff exit

    2007 ... 2nd round playoff exit

    2008 ... failed to make the playoffs

    2009 ... failed to make the playoffs

    With ratner cutting player payroll at breakneck speed, the nets can kiss the playoffs goodbye for years to come.

    Ratner is now cutting the salaries of nets assistant coaches by 50% ... which truly reveals how dire his financial situation has become.

    So yeah, i don't think lebron ever thought seriously about leaving one of the highest payrolls in the league (the cavs) for one of the lowest (the nets).

    Teams with cheap owners don't win championships in the nba ... never have, never will.

    If ratner ever takes on the zillions in debt from building atlantic yards, his penny-pinching with regard to the nets will only get worse.

  3. With regard to lebron's public posturing about possibly joining the nets, knicks or some other franchise in 2010, this is standard operating procedure for top-tier nba free agents.

    All top-tier free agents publicly drop hints that they might jump ship, yet they all end up staying right where they are ... as long as they get paid top-dollar, and as long as their other demands - usually regarding the quality of their supporting casts - are met.

    Even the rabid editorialist at the daily news ... whom i strongly suspect to be mitch lawrence ... had to know that lebron was simply engaging in standard free agent-speak when he talked to the press about how much he liked brooklyn and several other nba towns.

    I'd be willing to bet that lebron has not once in his life set foot in brooklyn, or that he could even find brooklyn with a g.p.s..


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…