Skip to main content

A closer look at the Borough President's budget, his marquee Coney project, and the off-books funding via the mayor's office

City Council Member and Comptroller candidate David Yassky is on to something with his It's Your Money NYC web site showing recent City Council earmarks. We need a lot more transparency, and it should go beyond the City Council.

After all, do we know what Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz does with his operating budget? Sort of, but it takes a little digging.

Do we know what Markowitz does with his discretionary budget? Not quite.

Do we know what Markowitz does with his capital budget, by far the greatest pot of money he controls?

People might be surprised to learn that some $24.6 million, more than a third of the total this year, is directed to the $64 million amphitheater planned for Asser Levy Park in Coney Island, home of one of the two summer concert series Markowitz has long sponsored. (It's been reported that Markowitz wants to spend $54 million from his office on the project, but I hadn't seen the context. Not everyone in Coney is happy with the idea of amplified music near religious institutions.)

Details needed

Remember, when Markowitz met with bloggers on April 23, he lamented the pressures on his budget but couldn't immediately provide details.

I later that day got some overall numbers. His staff pointed me to the city budget office (right; click on graphics to enlarge), which shows that the agency budget has indeed gone down dramatically.

I was told that, for FY 09, the budget is $4,729,484 for personnel and $914,826 for other spending, including $302,000 in discretionary funds. Also, the BP's office, was initially allocated $88.7 million in capital funding, but after cuts, the estimate is $70.96 million.

(Click on graphics to enlarge)

But what's next?

A city official the next day pointed me to p. 168 of the Departmental Estimate, Office of Management and Budget (PDF), Markowitz's office stands to lose a significant number of staffers, 24 of 75, in the proposed mayoral budget, as more than $1.4 million will be cut from his $4.4 million personnel budget.

Which staffers will go?

But which ones would be cut? Would it be any of the three chauffeur-attendants, important to moving Markowitz to the many promotional/ceremonial events he attends?

Or would it be any of the three people in the planning office, crucial to the nuts-and-bolts land use advice the BP's office is supposed to provide (and, according to Markowitz, are available to help beleaguered Community Boards)?

Or would it be some of the 20 community coordinators, nine community liaison workers, or 12 senior community liaison staff?

Markowitz spokesman Mark Zustovich several days later told me it's too soon to tell: "Our office is reviewing the budget and no determinations have been made, or timetable established, in respect to staffing."

Discretionary funding

Also, page 169 of the PDF shows that the $298,662 "special expense" line would be cut almost completely.

Zustovich said that was the BP's discretionary budget, which itself was cut dramatically from the previous fiscal year.

What was it used for? He said no information was available, as it will be tabulated at the end of the fiscal year (after June 30).

Overall trend: way down

The mayor's proposed Executive Budget (p. 9 of this PDF) shows a dramatic dropoff in funding for the Brooklyn Borough President's office, as well as for the other borough presidents.

Markowitz has publicly lamented the decline in support, telling the Brooklyn Paper that the mayoral budget doesn't show "respect," and it sure seems that he has a grievance.

There should be a public discussion of the proper funding levels for the offices of the Borough Presidents.

Back-door support

Meanwhile, as the New York Post reported last October, since 2003, the Bloomberg administration has provided at least $2.7 million in taxpayer funds to three nonprofit groups Markowitz controls, including Best of Brooklyn and the organizations that run his summer concert series. Forest City Ratner and others connected to Atlantic Yards also gave between $680,000 and $1,075,000 to Markowitz's nonprofits.

The Brooklyn Paper further reported that FCR and affiliated companies gave $200,000 to the Martin Luther King Jr. Concert series, and Barclays gave $60,000.

So, this is a way of funding certain targeted priorities of the Borough President's office. Some of those programs may be very welcome. But the back-door funding means even less oversight.

The capital budget

So, what does Markowitz do with his $71 million capital budget? As noted in a January profile by City Hall News, there's little guiding philosophy:
If he had an opponent, this might be a point of contention, along with the kinds of things which have received support from his discretionary budget over the years. Though Markowitz has a knack for grand thinking—Brooklyn as an international tourist destination? Astroland retooled for the 21st century?—his capital expenditures have been decidedly small-bore. Unlike Adolfo CarriĆ³n in the Bronx, who directed much of his capital money toward creating affordable housing, Markowitz has spent less than $9.5 million over seven years on this construction, lacking any identifiable emphasis toward this or anything else for his capital investments. In disbursements rarely higher than $1 million and generally much less, Markowitz has spread the money around to things like adding street planters and buying new equipment for community centers. To his critics, this is evidence of an inability and unwillingness to flex the full power of the office, though to defenders like Council Member Lew Fidler (D-Brooklyn), the hundreds of thousands of dollars the borough president has been pouring in to renovating school playgrounds in recent years is “not a small thing if it’s your playground.”

Well, maybe not so small-bore. Markowitz in February 2007 unveiled a $35 million plan for a new Coney amphitheater, as the Brooklyn Paper reported. By November 2008, it was a $64 million project, as the Brooklyn Paper reported. In January of this year, the Brooklyn Daily Eagle reported that Markowitz would contribute $54 million from his capital budget, and $10 million would come from the Mayor’s Office via Council Member Recchia.

That $54 million obviously isn't being disbursed in one year, since this year's budget, as the chart at right (supplied by the BP's office in response to my request) shows some $24.6 million. It also shows$10.75 million for the refurbishment of the Loews Kings Theater in Flatbush.

The rest of the numbers are somewhat opaque. There's apparently funding for playgrounds at schools and fixing libraries. There's little apparently directed at affordable housing, despite Markowitz's rhetoric about the importance of affordable housing at Atlantic Yards.

More info needed

Also notable is that I had to ask for the list--it's not online--and it took a couple of weeks, and that it came with no supporting explanations.

Such information should be accessible to anybody, right? Perhaps the next Comptroller, whether it be Yassky or a rival, will make sure there's more transparency. The issue should be part of the current campaign.

And maybe Mayor Mike Bloomberg, who's inundating New Yorkers with campaign mailings, can see fit to supply us with information citizens deserve, rather than advertisements for himself.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…