Skip to main content

Sunday in the Park at (New) Domino; the developer (obscurely) opens the door

Yesterday was an opportunity for a wide variety of Williamsburg residents to enjoy an afternoon in a remarkable space--the gritty concrete backyard of the closed Domino Sugar plant, open to the public--as the advertisement indicates--for the first time in a century.

There was popcorn and cotton candy, cider and hot chocolate--and, yes, dominoes. Hasids and hipsters and Hispanic residents cordially shared the same space, hinting at the promise of public space in such a diverse and often divided neighborhood. Some former workers in the sugar factory, which closed in 2004 after a bitter strike, also get a chance to revisit their stomping grounds. Many people brought cameras to capture the views of the Williamsburg Bridge and the shuttered factory.

Who's in charge?

But who was behind this event? You couldn't tell from the advertisement (above) in the Brooklyn Downtown Star or the Courier-Life chain. The poster on the street in Williamsburg, reproduced here, shows logos from advocacy groups like the Open Space Alliance of North Brooklyn, the Brooklyn Greenway Initiative, and the Metropolitan Waterfront Alliance.

The opening of new waterfront space in parks-deprived Williamsburg is certainly a legitimate goal, but it shouldn't be used to obscure the ongoing debate over the development that would bring the open space.

The advertisement welcomed people to "Domino." So did posters at the site (below). But the project that would transform the 11.2-acre site is called New Domino (official web site). It would preserve and adapt the existing main refinery building and involve up to 15 buildings and 2.86 million square feet of development.

A major project

In other words, the current open space, and the nifty potential space, depicted yesterday in renderings marked "for illustrative purposes only," comes attached to a mega-project that faces a contentious approval process, likely over the next year. Visitors yesterday were shown two renderings, both emphasizing open space as opposed to the project as a whole--no 300-foot or 400-foot towers--plus, as shown in the photo above, a schematic rendering of the open space.

The event yesterday was "to let people know what it will feel like," and the renderings of the open space are "what we'll be proposing," Susan M. Pollock, Senior VP for CPC Resources (CPCR), the for-profit subsidiary of Community Preservation Corporation, told me yesterday.

CPCR is the managing partner of Refinery, LLC, which is developing the New Domino project; while CPCR has a 30-year history of financing affordable housing throughout New York, its silent partner, Isaac Katan of the Katan Group, has a much more controversial track record.

As I've written, while a for-profit subsidiary of a nonprofit, like CPCR, may have lower profit goals than an investor trying to maximize return, there may be pressure to build more units and build taller to deliver the (unannounced) return the investor needs, even if the decisions are being made by CPCR.

Interestingly, Assemblyman Joe Lentol, who has supported the Atlantic Yards project without serious scrutiny, told The Brooklyn Paper in May that he can't support the project until CPCR opens up its books to justify the project's height and density.

And Refinery LLC has already spent nearly $560,000 this year on lobbying city officials and agencies, according to NYC Lobbyist Search.

(The New York Post, bizarrely enough, reported on the veiled waterfront open house, which offered nothing about the apartments planned, under the headline DOMINO EFFECT! B'KLYN HOME BUYERS CHASE SWEET LIFE: The economy may be turning sour, but potential residents sure are sweet on the chance to move into Brooklyn's Domino Sugar Factory.

(Metro also played up the residential angle, citing the possibility of ferry service: W’burg building offers free ride as tenant lure.)

Contrasts with AY

The New Domino project (right), unlike Atlantic Yards, will go through the city's Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP). The four acres of open space would be mapped as city parkland, again an improvement over the Atlantic Yards open space, which would be managed by a nonprofit organization.

And, of course, there's no way we could have a "Sunday in the Atlantic Yards open space," since so much depends on superblocks, unless someone closed off Pacific Street between Carlton and Vanderbilt avenues for a block party.

As with Atlantic Yards, however, the project is already delayed beyond its optimistic p.r. When the New Domino was announced in July 2007, construction was to start in 2008. I asked whether the credit crunch might affect the project. "Our financing is solid," Pollock said. "We have a lot of interest in the first phase."

She said that the seven-month ULURP process, which requires approval from the City Council and the City Planning Commission, along with advisory votes from the local community board, might start this fall.

So that offers a hint regarding the timing of yesterday's event. The opening of the waterfront certainly built some goodwill. But the veil over the developer's role should provoke skepticism as well.

Comments

  1. Your phrasing is a bit unclear in relation to the strike at Domino. The plant re-opened for a time following the strike, I believe it was operating for a year or two before the powers at be at Domino decide to close the plant shifting production to newer plants with less overhead in the south. Just wanted to clarify that a bit.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.