Skip to main content

The Markowitz defense: "I'm an activist and like to get things done"

Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz has come out swinging in defense of his use of mayoral and developer funds, via his charities, to support his concert series and other projects in Brooklyn. The problem is that Markowitz's defense is essentially the end justifies the means.

The New York Post summed up some of its coverage in a 10/13/08 editorial headlined BEEPING MARTY, taking some effort to separate its support for Atlantic Yards from its scorn for the BP and the office he holds:
A New York City borough president's main, if not only, responsibility is to be a cheerleader.

But for his borough, not for himself.

Brooklyn's Marty Markowitz, for example, is a most enthusiastic booster.

Yet Markowitz plainly believes the old philosophy of "doing well" (politically) by "doing good."

The beep is one of the biggest boosters for developer Bruce Ratner's Atlantic Yards project in downtown Brooklyn.

Make no mistake: We've long thought that Atlantic Yards - which includes a new arena for the now-New Jersey Nets, as well as residential and retail space - is a good idea.

Still, the amount of money being directed from the Ratner orbit to Markowitz' favorite nonprofits gives pause.

Since 2003, these groups - Best of Brooklyn, Inc., the Martin Luther King Concert Series and the Seaside Summer Concert Series - have raked in between $680,000 and $1,00,075 from various Ratner-affiliated companies and allies. (Presumably $1,000,075)

Last month, it was revealed that Markowitz directed no-bid city contracts worth nearly $700,000 to the aforementioned Best of Brooklyn - a disclosure raising the same questions as the City Council's nonprofit scandal earlier this year:

To wit, Markowitz helped direct city funds to his favorite personal causes - in amounts seemingly designed to avoid an audit by the city comptroller.

In this case, the Markowitz-Ratner relationship appears to be evading city campaign-finance regulations.

Again, it's in the best interests of New York for the Atlantic Yards project to go ahead. But whether the best interests of Beep Marty Markowitz should be part of the deal is another matter.

Markowitz, of course, is another New York politician out to bend public offices and resources to personal ends.

He's reprehensible, in other words, but par for an exceedingly low-rent course.

What's much less clear is why the office he holds even exists.

Markowitz has a $5 million budget, seven official cars and a staff of 84, which includes a $50,000 speechwriter, a $45,000 "proclamations writer" and three drivers - plus a "discretionary" budget (read: slush fund) of $302,000.

And what does Brooklyn get in return?

Marty Markowitz?

Banish the beeps.

Markowitz's defense

In a letter yesterday headlined MARTY TO THE RESCUE, the BP wrote:
Get your facts straight ("Beeping Marty," Editorial, Oct. 13). It was my idea to bring professional sports back to Brooklyn. I advocated for Atlantic Yards, with no strings attached, and I adamantly believe that its arena, affordable housing, retail and union jobs are vital to a vibrant Downtown Brooklyn.

I'm proud of the non-profits that the editorial mentions, which support teen employment, camp for needy kids, the Brooklyn Tourism Center, Dine in Brooklyn, Brooklyn Book Festival, health awareness and the free Seaside and MLK concerts, which attract top artists to underserved neighborhoods.

My good looks and $302,000 won't fund these programs. These groups comply with all regulations and are supported by private and public sources, including the mayor, City Council and state Legislature.

I also allocated $88.7 million in Fiscal Year 2009 capital funds to 95 organizations - from the Brownsville Partnership to the Brooklyn Ballet to the School for Innovation in Advertising and Media, orchestrated by my office with the DOE.

If the price of service to Brooklyn families is derision from The Post, so be it. Of course, you also want to paint borough presidents as "do-nothings," but you can't have it both ways.

Let's keep in mind that Markowitz wanted to bring basketball to Coney Island, not the Atlantic Yards site chosen by Forest City Ratner. (I've detailed other elements of Markowitz's questionable role regarding AY.)

And, of course, Markowitz avoids the issues. Are the Ratner contributions a way to avoid campaign finance limits? And what about those and four contracts that, as the Brooklyn Paper observed, "conveniently amount to $24,999 each"--just short of triggering city oversight.

In the Courier-Life

In this weekend's Courier-Life (publisher of his Brooklyn!! tabloid), Markowitz expanded on his end-justifies-the-means defense:
"My job is to bring money and services and programs to Brooklynites, and services and resources require money and it's [as] simple as that," said Markowitz.


He sounds almost a bit like Robert Moses:
"I'm an activist and like to get things done, and that's what I'm about, period," said Markowitz.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.