Skip to main content

The AY inevitability meme turns; will a "plagued" project "eventually succeed"?

An AP story yesterday, distributed nationally (heck, to Canada, even), was headlined Economy, uncertain financing plague Brooklyn arena.

It's perhaps turnabout to see a major press outlet cite reasons for skepticism--legal delays, rising costs, and the difficulty of raising capital--about developer Bruce Ratner's sunny statements:
Ratner, who has fended off years of community resistance to his plans, remains optimistic. "Let me be clear," he said last month, "that the project will go forward."

But financial experts and state and city officials who have heard the developer's private pleas for more government aid say the failing economy has created a far bleaker picture for Atlantic Yards.


But we simply don't know if the Internal Revenue Service will approve tax-exempt bonds to finance the $950 million arena. And, while the credit market may make it tougher to attract investors, would it "make it impossible," as the AP suggested? As I note below, we need to evaluate more than one scenario.

Eventual success?

In the closing paragraph, in fact, the article quotes Marc Ganis, a sports finance expert in Chicago, as saying the project is seriously challenged, though he and others think Ratner will eventually succeed.

So it's a bit presumptuous for the project's leading opponent, Daniel Goldstein of Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn, to say "This is just merely a fantasy that they're going to build this project. Yet they're moving forward as if everything's fine."

Sure, it's a fantasy that FCR would build the project at the timing and scale as announced. But, as I've written, the project--at least the arena--is very much in play. (I'm assuming that Ganis was talking about the arena.) Yes, the Barclays Center naming rights deal was tied to gaining financing by November, but Barclays has said it's still committed to the project.

And, while the AP cites "penalties" attached to delays in the project, the article doesn't mention that those penalties are hardly punitive.

A clearer timetable

Maybe, as with the Port Authority's recent analysis of the rebuilding plans at Ground Zero, we could use both a target date and a “probabilistic” date for Atlantic Yards.

In fact, yesterday, the New York Building Congress released a report on the construction downturn (Times coverage was headlined End Seen to New York Building Boom ), offering two scenarios:
It is difficult to predict the duration and depth of the current economic downturn, particularly in light of recent federal intervention. Consequently, two possible scenarios must be considered. In the first, any downturn in the construction industry would be short-lived and relatively shallow. With government steps to ease the credit crunch, thousands of jobs could be preserved; companies could begin adding more jobs; and foreign buyers, attracted by declining prices, could increase their investments in the Manhattan housing market—all of which would drive demand for office space and housing.

Thanks to recent actions by government, particularly the Bloomberg administration, there are numerous opportunities to build as demand dictates. This is the result of a series of enlightened rezonings affecting nearly one-sixth of New York City. In addition, approvals are in place and developers selected for massive undertakings such as the World Trade Center, Atlantic Yards, Hudson Yards, and the former Con Edison Waterside plant site.

Furthermore, major institutions, such as Columbia University, Saint Vincent’s Hospital, and the United Nations, are eager to embark on major expansion and redevelopment plans. In this scenario, government continues making critical investments in major infrastructure systems and, quite possibly, construction spending and employment would quickly return to record-setting levels.

The second scenario, also realistic, is a prolonged economic downturn that finds government slashing funding for mass transit, education, and other infrastructure projects, and the City’s next leaders adopting a more anti-development stance, making it harder for the private sector and major educational, health and cultural institutions to realize their expansion plans. This would likely signal an end to New York’s construction boom and potentially usher in a period of slow growth for New York City’s economy and the building industry.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.