Skip to main content

State Senator to hold eminent domain hearing September 17

Harlem State Senator Bill Perkins, a critic of Columbia University's plans to use eminent domain, has announced a hearing on the practice of eminent domain in New York State, to be held on the morning of September 17. (In the afternoon that day, a state appellate court will hear oral arguments in the case challenging the Atlantic Yards environmental review).

It's likely Perkins is most interested in the Columbia case, the subject of a recent Wall Street Journal op-ed. It's also likely Atlantic Yards opponents will try to get on the witness list, especially because Perkins is interested in eminent domain used "at the behest of private developers" and which "at worst create[s] the impression of a corporatocracy instead of true democratic governance."

Can Perkins get anywhere? The State Senate is at this moment controlled by the Republicans, not Democrats like Perkins, but that could change in November. Still, all legislation must get through Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, an Atlantic Yards supporter who's unlikely to favor changes that hamper the project.

Whether legislation emerges from the hearing, it at least will cast some light on this complex and sometimes dubious practice.

The announcement

Senator Bill Perkins, ranking member of the Committee on Corporations, Authorities & Commissions will convene a hearing on the execution of the policy of eminent domain by the State and City of New York.

SUBJECT: The Use of Eminent Domain in New York State

PURPOSE: To solicit input on the procedures and rationale for the implementation of Eminent Domain as an economic development tool for recent private development projects.

PLACE: Adam Clayton Powell Jr. State Office Building 163 West 125th Street, 8th Floor

TIME: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:00am

It is understood that the issue of eminent domain has been heightened in the public consciousness by a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Kelo vs. New London that upheld the Ability of government entities to utilize eminent domain for the purposes of furthering economic development objectives. During 2005, hearings were convened and studies were undertaken to examine the role of eminent domain in the city and the state, as well as the rest of the country.

In New York City the citizenry is taking stock of the middle stage of the proposed Columbia University expansion to a mixed residential/commercial district in West Harlem. That middle stage consists of the necessary government sign offs, which includes agreement from the New York City Council and a declaration of blight by the Urban Development Corporation dba the Empire State Development Corporation.

The Senator has requested that participants in this hearing direct their focus to what has become a unique phenomenon in the execution of eminent domain in New York. In many instances, eminent domain is an instrument used by government, not in the context of their independently created economic development plans, but at the behest of private developers who wish for the state and city to use its powers of eminent domain to aggregate parcels of land for commercial benefit.

This methodology has strained the relationship between government and communities affected by these development plans, that have at best, a vague public purpose and at worst create the impression of a corporatocracy instead of true democratic governance. It will be critical to examine the original procedural structure in place to justify and exercise eminent domain. The Senator also wishes to investigate past practices that subvert the role and responsibility of government to pursue eminent domain only as a last resort and with an arm's length relationship to potential private developers.

It is the intention of Senator Perkins to craft legislation that addresses the inequities and the corruptive potential of mixing private purpose with the public interest. It will be important to ensure that valid economic development objectives can be clearly identified, while abuses are identified and corrected. He will need the guidance of those who have developed a fact based point of view on both sides of this important issue before the public.

Participation will be by invitation only. Opening remarks should be limited to five minutes in duration. Five copies of those remarks and other written materials should be submitted at the registration desk.

Written materials will also be accepted and may be sent to the contact person listed on the reply form. In order to publicize this hearing further, please inform interested parties of the Senator's interest in receiving written remarks from all sources.

Persons wishing to present pertinent testimony at the above hearing should complete and return the enclosed form as soon as possible. It is important the reply form be fully completed and returned so that persons may be notified in the event of emergency postponement or cancellation. Oral testimony will be limited to 5 minutes. In preparing the order of witnesses we will attempt to accommodate individual requests to speak at particular times in view of special circumstances.

These requirements should be made on the attached reply form or communicated to staff as early as possible. We look forward to your participation.

Democratic members of the Committee on Corporations, Authorities & Commissions
Senator Bill Perkins, Ranking Member
Senator Efrain Gonzalez, Member

PUBLIC HEARING REPLY FORM

Persons invited to present testimony at the hearing on Eminent Domain are requested to complete this reply form as soon as possible and mail or fax it to:

Linda Wood Guy
Office of State Senator Bill Perkins
163 West 125th Street, Suite 912
New York, NY 10027
Tel: 212-222-7315
Fax: 212-678-0001
e-mail: woodguy [at] senate.state.ny.us

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…