Skip to main content

Fact vs. Fiction vs. Fact: City statement on Yankees vs. Brodsky statement

The city responded vigorously Thursday to Assemblyman Richard Brodsky's report slamming Yankee Stadium financing plan, and Brodsky responded Friday in kind.

The city statement

Yankee Stadium: Fact vs. Fiction

At a time when economic development is sorely needed in New York, AM Richard Brodsky is criticizing a project that has led to one of the largest private investments in Bronx history, creating thousands of unionized jobs. AM Brodsky was right on the many occasions when he voted in favor of this project, and fortunately is too late to derail its success. His new efforts, though, may create hurdles for other economic development projects, including, for example, Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn - a $4 BN project expected to create thousands of unionized jobs and 2,000+ units of affordable housing.


AM Brodsky: "Only 15 new permanent jobs would be created."


Yankees currently project 1,000 new, permanent jobs; 5,000+ unionized, construction jobs

In 2006 IDA application, Yankees reported the following relating to permanent jobs:
§ 2006: 104 Full Time (FT)/879 Part Time (PT) employees

§ Projected Post-Project: 140FT/950PT + 550-750PT concessionaire employees

City undertook the project for many reasons beyond just jobs ($1BN+ private investment; relieves City of maintenance that would have exceeded rent by $41MM over 40 yrs.; creates new parkland, infrastructure, and transportation improvements; 67% of construction contracts so far to NYC cos./29% to Bronx cos.)

Land Assessment

AM Brodsky: "The profound differences among the three appraisals were not an accident or omission."


DoF used standard procedures for assessment
IDA has appropriately had no involvement in assessment
Referenced valuations looked at land for different purposes and so had different assumptions (e.g., not all assumed completion of $1+ BN stadium; not all assumed $200+ MM of public infrastructure)

Luxury Box

AM Brodsky: "Luxury suite was secretly acquired by NYCIDA and the Mayor's Office with the proceeds from stadium bonds."


City only has an option to use suite
Suite being built with taxable, not tax-exempt, debt
Deal was disclosed as early as 2006 in official statement for project bonds
Deal is consistent with what City has had for years at Shea, Cyclones and Staten Island Yankees stadia
Available to reward employees and entertain dignitaries to market New York (as cities around U.S. do)


AM Brodsky: "Failure to provide accurate and complete information to the public about authority activities and finances."


One of the most transparent projects in City history
Almost 20 public hearings (though Assembly held no hearings before its park alienation vote)
Approved by IDA Board, City Council, State Legislature, Gov., IRS
Hundreds of hours responding to Brodsky/Kucinich questions and testifying before Brodsky


AM Brodsky: "The total cost to taxpayers and savings to the Yankees is between $585 million and $826 million."


AM Brodsky says use of PILOTs to pay bonds is a cost to City, but before and after project, City will be collecting exactly the same amount in real estate taxes from the Yankees

AM Brodsky counts lost income tax on tax-exempt bonds as a cost of project, but:
§ Many bond purchasers may not be NYC/NYS residents and would not pay taxes even if bonds were taxable

§ Yankees have said that without tax-exemption, they would not have done project, so bonds for a new stadium would never have been issued on a taxable basis

AM Brodsky looks at project costs and ignores benefits (2006 IDA cost-benefit analysis est. $41MM net benefit)

City is contributing capital only to infrastructure ($174 MM for parks; $37 MM for general infrastructure;
$39 MM for Metro-North; $31 MM for soft costs)


Noteworthy Votes by AM Brodsky (2005 to 2008)

AM Brodsky voted repeatedly in favor of new Yankee Stadium
Park Alienation (June 2005; S5818)
05-06 Budget Amendment, incl. ~$70MM for Garages (June 2005; S5928)
06-07 Budget, incl. ~$70MM for Garages (March 2006; S7166/A10486)
06-07 Budget Amendment, incl. ~$70MM for Garages (April 2006; S7265/A10653)
06-07 Tech. Budget Amendment, incl. ~$70MM for Garages (April 2006; A10652)
Education, Labor, Family Assistance and Econ Devel. Budget, incl. ~$70MM for Garages (S6807c)
Just this year, AM Brodsky voted in favor of bailing out two sports enterprises:
New York Racing Authority ~$140MM bailout (February 2008; A9998)
Monticello Raceway incentives (June 2008, S8700/A11744)

Selected, Recent Tax-Exempt Financings of Economic Development Projects (2002 to 2008)

2002: Chatham Ridge Redevelopment in Chicago, IL ($18 MM)
2002: Gallery Place Project in Washington, DC ($74 MM)
2002: Mandarin Oriental Project in Washington, DC ($46 MM)
2005: Downtown Mixed-Use Redevelopment in Kansas City, MO ($115 MM)
2006: Former Myrtle Beach Air Force Base Mixed-Use Redevelopment in Myrtle Beach, SC ($31 MM)

The Brodsky statement

Statement of Emma Furman, Deputy Chief of Staff to Assemblyman Richard Brodsky


“FACT V. FICTION”, New York City’s non-denial denial response to the facts in Assemblyman Brodsky’s Yankee Stadium Report requires only a re-statement of the City’s own sworn statements to reveal the truth.


Now: “Yankees currently project 1,000 new, permanent jobs.”

Then: Page 7 of the Yankees sworn March 2008 Core Application to the IDA.

Number of existing permanent jobs: 125

Number of jobs after completion of new Stadium: 140

Then we did the math……………………net increase: 15

Now they scramble to change what the documents reveal. Nice pivot. What did you expect them to say once the sworn data was made public?


Now: “Referenced valuations looked at land for different purposes”

Then: For the IRS the City valued the Stadium land at $204 million, $275 psf

For the National Park Service the City valued the same land at $21 million, $30 psf

For New York State the City valued the same land at $40 million, $50 psf

Well, the whole point of valuing the land separately is to not change the value because of the actual building on it. That is valued separately. Three different land appraisals, three different City financial needs, three different values, three different sworn submissions to the Feds. You couldn’t make this stuff up. And by the way, take a look at land values elswhere in the neighborhood, including another City deal, the Bronx Terminal Market, put together by Related. Land value there? $9 per square foot. Exactly how do they do these assessments?


Now: “Deal was disclosed as early as 2006 in official statement for project bonds.”

Then: There have been plenty of press conferences extolling non-existent jobs etc. Did anyone mention luxury suites publicly? Did anyone mention that ticket prices were going to skyrocket so that the same taxpayers paying for the Stadium couldn’t afford to go, but the political class gets to go free? Gimme a break.


Now: “One of the most transparent projects in City history.”

Then: Transparent? Was the “Deviation Letter” saying there was no required public economic benefit made public? Nope. Was the decision to issue a billion dollars in tax-free bonds made by elected officials? Nope. Exactly who is the IDA and how did they come to control City debt?


Now: “City will be collecting exactly the same amount in real estate taxes from the Yankees.”

(And in and earlier press release) “Funding for the $800 million in construction costs is being provided fully by the Yankees.”

Then: In a sworn letter to the IRS the City says. “The City has determined to use its property taxes (in this case PILOTs) to finance the construction and operation…of the Stadium.”

Now which City statement do you want to believe, the press release or the sworn statement to the IRS? The Yankees are getting close to $1 billion in taxpayer money.

All we did was read the sworn statements in previously undisclosed documents, and compare it to the press releases then and now. These are the City’s own words, not anyone’s opinion. We’re not happy to uncover this mess. But at a time when we can’t fund the capital needs of the MTA, or schools, or hospitals, the City can pour billions into sports facilities. But the truth is the truth, and the City will have to live with it.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…