Skip to main content

Report suggests solutions for small businesses after the Downtown Brooklyn rezoning

On July 24, I wrote about the unanticipated impacts of the Downtown Brooklyn rezoning and wondered what policy changes might emerge. A new report, Out of Business: The Crisis of Small Businesses in Rezoned Downtown Brooklyn, from FUREE (Families United for Racial and Economic Equality) and the Community Development Project of the Urban Justice Center cites extensive displacement of small business (mainly run by immigrants) and suggests four policy solutions, including grants and reserved commercial space.

(Here's a video from the press conference--and another.)

Joe Chan, president of the Downtown Brooklyn Partnership, the public-private organization steering the rezoning, offered a noncommittal quote to Brownstoner, which offered some lengthy coverage yesterday: "Downtown Brooklyn is one of the fastest growing urban centers in America. The redevelopment activity in the area brings with it jobs and a permanently enhanced local economy. The Downtown Brooklyn Partnership with its BID partners work to connect small business owners with available resources and appropriate service providers." (It has, in some cases, but not enough, according to FUREE.)

Solutions in the report

The first solution involves grants:
1. Create a small-business assistance fund for Downtown Brooklyn businesses.
New York City should support immediate and long-term financial assistance to area small-businesses. In the short-term, city dollars and developer contributions should be channeled into a fund that would address the hardships faced by small businesses displaced by the rezoning. Displaced small-businesses need to be compensated for their relocation and moving costs, for increased costs incurred by being forced to move when rent is at an all-time high, for lost revenue due to displacement, and for the advertising and marketing needed to rebuild their customer base. Displaced workers need high-quality job training and placement services.

New York already has active Business Relocation Assistance Corporations (BRAC). The Greenpoint-Williamsburg BRAC disburses grants of up to $50,000 to displaced businesses so long as they relocate within the five boroughs and the recent rezoning in Harlem also included a fund for displaced small-businesses. Finally, in addition to a flat reimbursement, the city fund could subsidize low-interest small-business loans or offer a loan-forgiveness program for businesses displaced by development.

This is a political decision. If the rezoning creates more wealth, shouldn’t some of that wealth be shared? How much?

Affordable space

2. Secure affordable commercial-space for small businesses.
Before the first brick is laid on new construction, the city, developers, and independent businesses must agree on a way to maintain space for the small businesses that enhances the neighborhood’s character. Since redevelopment raises area rent and is marketed to a different customer-base, small businesses must be given a chance to adapt to the changed competitive market. New developments, particularly those such as City Point at Albee Square Mall that displaced small businesses, should be mandated to provide 15% of their space to local businesses at subsidized rents. This allotted commercial space should go first to previous tenants and then to local minority- and woman-owned small-businesses.

There are models to point to for this type of community support: in San Jose, developers working on a $140 million multi-use project set aside 10% of retail space for existing downtown small-businesses…. Finally, in all cases new developments should practice targeted local hiring for displaced workers and residents of the surrounding community.

In some cases, tax breaks are granted for new housing in exchange for some subsidized units. This transfers it to the commercial side, though it’s clearly a less established concept.

Additionally, FUREE recommends increasing affordable land supply by developing upper-floor retail in Downtown Brooklyn for small businesses. With careful planning, the activation of vacant upper-stories for small-business use could help sustain the area’s diverse retail mix. Specifically, the underutilized upper-floors of many buildings on the Fulton Street Mall present a remarkable economic opportunity for the area. By tapping this space for mixed-use occupancy, both local entrepreneurs and shoppers will be better served and Downtown Brooklyn’s dynamism will endure.

Well, those floors are underutilized, but only certain retail establishments thrive with off-the-street access. Brownstoner’s Sarah Ryley reports that “a prominent local broker explained to us that Fulton Mall's retail space is so lucrative that landlords actually removed stairwells and elevators in many of the buildings to create more ground-floor space” and landlords stopped maintaining lower-rent upper floors.

More input

3. Ensure community and small-business participation in the decision-making process of public and private developments.
Before an urban area goes through revitalization it is important to have a system or policy in place that allows the community and small businesses to have input on projects that will ultimately affect them. Planning codes that attempt to limit formula retail-stores, such as those implemented in San Francisco, can include a clause that requires residents and businesses in the surrounding area to be notified of proposed developments.

Once notified, the community has the option of requesting a public hearing and subjecting the applicant to additional assessment that should focus on the effect of the new plan on community stakeholders. By starting a project with a community impact review, new commercial developments won’t be able to begin until all affected parties are served.

This may be the most contentious solution (though all likely will meet resistance), given the unwieldiness of deciding what community gets to speak.

FUREE also recommends that the Downtown Brooklyn Partnership consult with area small-business owners as they spend millions on extensive streetscape improvements in the area. To date, small-business owners have not been included in any discussion of streetscape improvement, despite the fact that they have unique and valuable insights...

How hard would it be to consult?

The broader challenge

The fourth solution speaks to a broader challenge:
4. Implement long-term protections for small businesses in Downtown Brooklyn and all of New York City.
Gentrification and the subsequent displacement of small business are not unique to Downtown Brooklyn. Several neighborhoods around New York City are experiencing different versions of the same story and are attempting to organize around this issue. City government must develop holistic, broad-based policies to account for the peril its rezoning has wrought on local communities. These solutions include commercial rent control, zoning and land-use policies limiting big-box stores that don’t benefit the community, requiring community impact reviews before major developments are allowed to break ground, and tax breaks for small businesses and the property-owners who rent to them.

Moreover, protections against landlord harassment and outlawing eminent domain for the sake of private development would also greatly safeguard small businesses in changing neighborhoods. Many of these strategies have been implemented in large and small cities around the country to great success.

This points to the general sense, in multiple neighborhoods, that New York may be “losing its soul,” an issue raised last year in the first Jane Jacobs panel. It’s worth a look beyond Downtown Brooklyn.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.