Skip to main content

Questions unanswered in the State Funding Agreement

One lesson from the Atlantic Yards saga is that, at least in this case, the approval in December 2006 by the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) was not the end of the story but a midpoint, given that negotiations regarding funding agreements--and thus project deadlines--were in the future.

(Is this standard operating procedure for most ESDC projects? That's a question worth looking into.)

And even the State Funding Agreement, signed last September but made public last month, leaves several ambiguities subject to further negotiations. In other words, it's very much not over--but the negotiations are not exactly public. Perhaps the law, proposed by Assemblyman Richard Brodsky, requiring the ESDC to report on details of the project might get to some of these details.

Pending questions

Part 33 of the Funding Agreement includes Exhibit K (Project Documentation Terms), which contains some unresolved or ambiguous segments.

(First page at right; click to enlarge)

I posed several questions to the Empire State Development Corporation. Spokesman Warner Johnston told me last week it was too soon to provide details: "Exhibit K to the funding agreement sets forth certain requirements, or parameters, to be included within the project documents (i.e. the development agreement, leases, etc) with the expectation that certain terms and conditions would be negotiated at a later date (but prior to acquisition of the site and finalization of the documents). "

"The Project Documents have not been finalized and the negotiations are on-going," he added. "Accordingly, we are not in a position, at this time, to respond to these specific questions while the details are being negotiated. Once the documents have been finalized – all project terms will be made available."

[Below, the questions I posed.]

Arena delays

Under Arena Commitment and Remedies, it states that a failure to complete construction within 6 years means an obligation to "repay each year a portion, to be established in the Project Documentation, of State Funding." When might that be established? Do we know the size of each portion?

Phase 1 delays

Under Phase 1 Commitment and Remedies, it similarly states that a failure to complete construction within 12 years means an obligation to repay "a portion to be established...." Again, do we know timing or amount?

Phase 2 delays

Under Phase 2 Commitment and Remedies, it states that a "Final Deadline" will be established in the Project Documentation. Again, when might the documentation be concluded?

When's Final Deadline

That same section refers to a Final Deadline that takes "into account the need for satisfaction of Governmental Authorities' obligations to the Project."

I'm not clear on what "Governmental Authorities' obligations" means--is that the direct subsidies of $100M from state and $205M from city? Or does that refer to affordable housing finance? Or something else?

Timetable for affordable for-sale units


Under Affordable Home Ownership, it says that "Developer shall provide 600-1000 units..." but there's no timetable or enforcement mechanism. Will there be one? By when? What might it say?

Investing in parks

Under Open Space and Park Improvements, it states "Developer or its Affiliates shall invest $3 million..." Again, any timetable or enforcement mechanism?

Timing issues

I asked Johnston if ESDC had any estimate of when negotiations would be completed. He responded: "I don't have a ballpark but we are working to expedite these negotiations."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.