Skip to main content

FCR's Stuckey stonewalls re CBs; brochure poster girl rips Ratner

So, what does Forest City Ratner have to say about the complaints made by the Community Boards that the developer has misrepresented their participation in "crafting" the Community Benefits Agreement? In the developer's favored Brooklyn weekly, the Courier-Life chain--which last year published a softball interview with CEO Bruce Ratner--VP Jim Stuckey obfuscated rather than apologized.

His response came in a roundup article headlined "Critics Blast Latest Ratner Mailer As ‘Propaganda’" (and embedded below):
Stuckey responded that while the community boards were legally prevented from being official parties involved in the CBA given their governmental responsibilities, they did play a role in the process.
A draft outline of the key points of the CBA document was in fact shared with them for discussion with key committees, he said.
“In addition to this process, we met with individual community boards on many occasions and also attended a joint community board meeting that was also open to the public,” Stuckey said.


However, did play a role does not mean crafted. Nor did Stuckey acknowledge that the CBs were barred from attending working sessions. As for that joint community board meeting in November, 2004, there was no crafting of anything, just a smooth-talking Stuckey and a very contentious audience.

Stuckey apparently wasn't asked to respond to the CBs' request that FCR "discontinue all mention, in any form, of our participation."

The Brooklyn Papers didn't have the story, which broke early Thursday afternoon in this blog, after their deadline. None of the dailies have followed up, though The New York Observer's blog The Real Estate took note.

Poster girl rips Ratner

Both the Courier-Life chain and the Brooklyn Papers added to the coverage of Forest City Ratner's deceptive mailer, a story broken Wednesday by this blog, NoLandGrab, and Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn. While the story was picked up by The New York Observer's blog The Real Estate and the real estate blog Curbed, it hasn't yet been cited in the dailies.

Notably, as the Brooklyn Papers reported, actress T. Sahara Meer was deeply dismayed that the photographer who took her picture sold the photo to the developer: “That innocent day in the park [is] one of the most nightmarish experiences of my life: I have become Bruce Ratner’s poster girl,” said Meer, who has a “Stop Eminent Domain Abuse” sign in the window of her Prospect Heights home. “My only hope for redemption is to fight harder. So, thanks, Bruce, for fueling my fire, my anger, my ire, my hatred of you.”

Marty backpedals

The Courier-Life questioned Borough President Marty Markowitz about his open letter on the second page of the brochure:
A Markowitz spokesperson said the borough president’s office provided no funding for the flier and had little to do with the concept.
“There was no role whatsoever. We had nothing to do with the concept or the planning. They did ask if Marty would write a letter and he did,” the spokesperson said.


Unmentioned was the content of Markowitz's letter. Though he claimed that the "booklet is another step in familiarizing Brooklynites with the details of the project," he either denied reality or had not actually seen the brochure.

Those mysterious blogs & the CBA

The Courier-Life article continued:
Additionally, several blogs that have been highly critical of the FCRC proposal questioned the validity of the CBA.
These blogs pointed out that several of the signatories received money from FCRC, were not registered non-profit organizations prior to the CBA negotiations, and said that the document wasn’t inclusive of the entire community.


Which blogs? How mysterious to not name them--do the newspaper's editors and reporters fear that their readers might consult another source?

But a CBA defender was found:
...But Bertha Lewis, who heads the New York chapter of ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) and who signed the CBA on behalf of the organization, defended both the CBA and the housing component.
The signatories had several pro bono attorneys looking at the CBA and ACORN, as a national organization had its general counsel look at it, Lewis said.
Lewis further stated the CBA calls for an independent monitoring body that “does not have a dog in this fight” to oversee the CBA’s implementation.


The role of the lawyers and the independent monitoring body don't actually address the criticisms, but Lewis should be expected to defend the CBA--she's contractually obligated to support the project. But what would experts on CBAs say?

Critics Blast Latest Ratner Mailer

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.