Bolstering the assets of the Barclays Center operating company, an enormous $467.6M for ethereal "Goodwill," triple the previously claimed value of "Intangibles"
The most recent annual report from the Barclays Center operating company, Brooklyn Events Center, as I reported, indicated that FY 2020 revenue fell well short of projections, unable to cover the required annual bond payments.
Another page in the document raises some questions. The balance sheet below shows an enormous sum, $467.6 million, for "Goodwill," a previously unstated portion of the asset owned by Joe Tsai.It also suggests a bet that the arena company, which has not been able to cover required bond payments with revenues, will recover after the pandemic, with the Brooklyn Nets at star-studded strength, and be worth the approximately $1 billion that Tsai reportedly paid. (Not only should revenues be sufficient to pay off bonds, they also were supposed to deliver tens of millions of dollars in profits.)
That figure for Goodwill represents a tripling of the value attributed to the similarly ethereal "Intangibles" previously claimed as assets, when the arena company was owned by Mikhail Prokhorov. (Note: the new document says that the Tsai and Prokhorov eras can't be fully compared, since they rely "on two different historical-cost bases of accounting," but I'd argue that these factors can be roughly compared.)
That large sum for Goodwill seemingly--if indirectly--counterbalances a significant liability, $297 million in member's equity, which previously was counterbalanced by a significant amount of available cash, a tangible asset.
Goodwill, according to Investopedia, is "the portion of the purchase price" higher than the value of assets and liabilities. "The value of a company’s brand name, solid customer base, good customer relations, good employee relations, and proprietary technology represent some reasons why goodwill exists.""
How was it arrived at? As shown in the screenshot at right, an independent valuation firm backed management estimates as of the September 2019 acquisition:
To determine the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, the Company engaged an independent third-party valuation firm. The independent third-party valuation firm supported management’s conclusion of the following estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the Acquisition Date...In determining the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, several valuation methodologies were considered and relied upon, each as appropriate for each asset or liability valued. These methodologies relied upon included the income, market, and cost-based approaches.
Comments
Post a Comment