Skip to main content

"Impeccable" affordability? Next two subsidized towers skewed to those earning six figures

Also note analysis regarding on the claim of "Brooklyn's newest neighborhood," the delay in the promised Atlantic Yards Community Development Corporation, and the already-launched effort to sell condos to Chinese buyers.

Keep your eye on the ball, people.

The "affordable housing" in the next two Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park towers containing such subsidized units won't be that affordable, as it will be skewed to middle-income households earning six figures.

It was a huge gap in the claimed community victory that got the developer to agree to build the 2,250 units of affordable housing (of 6,430 total units) by 2025 instead of the outside date of 2035.

Also, despite the focus on the first all-affordable tower starting tomorrow and a second one next June, the context--the most likely plan-- is that four market-rate towers will start in the next 18 months or so. 

Unspecific claims of affordability

At tomorrow's groundbreaking for 535 Carlton, Greenland Forest City Partners promises an "impeccable variety of rental apartments affordable to low, moderate and middle-income New Yorkers." 

Daily News columnist Denis Hamill, in a typically sycophantic preview, focusing on Forest City CEO MaryAnne Gilmartin, wrote, "Located at Carlton Ave. and Dean St. in Prospect Heights, Brooklyn, all of the 298 units are destined for low, moderate and middle-income families."

Crain's New York Business reported:

The 298-unit building now underway by Greenland Forest City Partners is known as 535 Carlton Ave. All the units will be designated as affordable. The partnership also plans to immediately begin construction on a 275-unit market-rate condo building at 550 Vanderbilt, and then in June to begin work on 30 Sixth Ave., another 100% affordable building that will contain 300 units.
In total, the two affordable buildings will provide units based on a metric called area median income [AMI], which in New York City was $85,900 for a family of four in 2013.
Of the nearly 600 affordable apartments, about 30 of them will be for families earning up to 40% of AMI, about 150 will be for 60% of AMI, another roughly 30 for families earning 100%, about 90 for families earning 145% and about 300 for families earning up to 165%.
What it means

Let's break that down. If we use the numbers from Crain's, it means that about half the units would go to households earning six figures, especially if we consider that AMI likely will have risen by 20165.

And while such households certainly would appreciate a discount off a market-rate unit, and may have trouble finding quality housing in a prime location at an affordable cost, they were hardly the people rallying for affordable housing.
2014 AMI is actually lower, at $83.900, but AMI when the building opens  surelywill be higher
The differs significantly from the arrangement in the Affordable Housing Memorandum of Understanding Forest City Ratner signed with ACORN in 2005, and which was incorporated into the Community Benefits Agreement, as shown below..

Note that 40% of the affordable units are supposed to be low-income, but only 30% in the next two buildings would be low-income.

Also note that only 20% of the affordable units are supposed to go to the best-off cohort, earning 140%-160% of AMI, but instead 50% would go to the best-off cohort, earning as much as 165% of AMI.


Changing rent levels

There are multiple ways to make adjustments, thus bringing the developer more revenue. The first, as noted above, is to change the configuration, skewing more of the total affordable units toward middle-income households.

The second, as noted above, is to tweak the bands, raising the percentage of income for each of the cohorts, so, for example, the maximum for low-income households is 60% of AMI rather than 50%,

The third is where the rent levels are set. For the new towers, rents will be set at 37% of AMI, 57% of AMI, 80% of AMI, 130% of AMI, and 160% of AMI. Notably, the latter two figures are above the 120% of AMI and 150% of AMI originally promised.

If rents are based on 160% of AMI, and 2013 AMI is $85,900 (as reported in Crain's), that suggests a four-person household in the top cohort would pay $3,436 for a two-bedroom unit, based on 30% of income.

If rents are based on 160% of AMI, and 2014 AMI is $83,900 (as I was told by city officials), that means a four-person household would pay $3,356 for a two-bedroom units

Due to other adjustments in the calculations, the numbers are slightly different.

As I reported in BKLYNR, low-income two-bedroom units in the next Atlantic Yards towers would rent at $647 and $1,025 a month, if available in 2014, and moderate-income ones would cost $1,458. But those income “bands” make up only 35 percent of the total affordable units. Another 15 percent would rent to a middle-income cohort for which two-bedroom apartments would cost $2,405.

And fully half the units would be reserved for another middle-income group, who’d pay $1,967 for a studio, $2,470 for a one-bedroom, $2,972 for a two-bedroom, and $3,430 for a three-bedroom, according to current projections.

And those numbers surely will go up.




Comments

  1. Anonymous5:44 PM

    What should be addressed is that Jonathan Springer is a former Empire State Development Corporation employee.
    http://www.nychdc.com/content/pdf/BoardMaterial/072513/Appointment%20of%20Senior%20Vice%20President-Jonathan%20Springer.pdf

    In what best interest does NYCHDC when they are a arm to HPD?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous12:42 AM

    This gets more ridiculous. The person who wrote how reduce the cost of affordable housing is giving loans out - http://furmancenter.org/files/publications/NYCHousingCost2005.pdf

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

"There is no alternative": DM Glen on de Blasio's affordable housing strategy

As I've written, Mayor Bill de Blasio sure knows how to steer and spin coverage of his affordable housing initiatives.

Indeed, his latest announcement, claiming significant progress, came with a pre-press release op-ed in the New York Daily News and then a friendly photo-op press conference with an understandably grateful--and very lucky--winner of an affordable housing lottery.

To me, though, the most significant quote came from Deputy Mayor Alicia Glen, who, as the Wall Street Journal reported:
said public housing had been “starved” of federal support for years now, leaving the city with fewer ways of creating affordable housing. “Are we relying too heavily on the private sector?” she said. “There is no alternative.” Though Glen was using what she surely sees as a common-sense phrase, it recalls the slogan of a politician with whom I doubt de Blasio identifies: former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a Conservative who believed in free markets.

It suggests the limits to …