Skip to main content

Announcing groundbreaking for next tower, Greenland Forest City declares Pacific Park "Brooklyn's newest neighborhood"

Also note analysis regarding the delay in the promised Atlantic Yards Community Development Corporation, the lack of real affordability in the next two towers, and the efforts to market unbuilt condos to Chinese buyers.

It's "Orwellian, almost," to quote former Forest City executive Jim Stuckey.

Just as the name Pacific Park attempts to erase the name, history, and taint of Atlantic Yards, the new joint venture, Greenland Forest City Partners, now claims that the project--all 22 acres, with a long-established arena block--will be "Brooklyn's newest neighborhood."

That promise comes in an invitation (right) to the Monday groundbreaking for 535 Carlton, the first tower built by the joint venture, and the second to start, after the ill-fated B2 modular tower, now stalled at ten stories at Dean Street and Flatbush Avenue.

This will be the (presumably well-orchestrated, and carefully managed) coming-out pep rally for Greenland, which has avoided public appearances in Brooklyn. Set up for the event is occurring throughout the weekend and on Monday will begin at around 4:30 am.

Greenland Group Chairman and President Zhang Yuliang will be there along with Bruce Ratner and various elected and community officials. (Will any express chagrin about the delayed Atlantic Yards Community Development Corporation?)

A building and a neighborhood?

The rendering in the invite misleadingly portrays the tower as fading into the sky, gently transitioning from the row-house block and crowned with a leafy halo.

How can a 22-acre site be a neighborhood? There's no natural configuration, especially since a huge chunk of the block between Dean and Pacific streets and Sixth and Carlton avenues is not part of the site.

How can part of the "neighborhood," Site 5 (currently occupied by Modell's and P.C. Richard), be across a major artery, Flatbush Avenue, at the far west end of the site?

model shown to potential immigrant investors in China,
though not shown publicly in Brooklyn. A neighborhood? 
Heck, the much larger Stuyvesant Town in Manhattan isn't even a neighborhood, but more of a development or a district.

A "neighborhood" from scratch

The hubris in the name recalls that of original project architect Frank Gehry.

After the project announcement, the 12/11/03 New York Times erroneously quoted Gehry as saying he'd never had an opportunity "to build a neighborhood from scratch in an urban setting."

Actually, he said the opportunity was to "build a whole neighborhood practically from scratch and fit it into an existing fabric and make something special out of it."

So Gehry acknowledged it wasn't from scratch but he did think it was a neighborhood.

But it wasn't, and it isn't. The Park Slope Civic Council testified in 2006:
The development plan will not create a neighborhood, but rather a high-density enclave between several neighborhoods which will in fact be a new urban form, however, more likely analogous to a spaceship landing in a field than a unifying element in the community.... It may work in concert with itself but not with the surrounding neighborhoods.
"Impeccable" affordability

The not-bashful text in the invite declares all-affordable 535 Carlton to include an "impeccable variety of rental apartments affordable to low, moderate and middle-income New Yorkers."

Shouldn't a developer responsible for the not-impeccable modular tower be a little more careful?

Moreover, that fudges the reality that the affordability is skewed significantly to middle-income households, with half the units going to those who'd pay some $3,000 for a two-bedroom, and commensurately for other apartments.


The configuration diverges significantly from that promised in the Affordable Housing Memorandum of Understanding and the Community Benefits Agreement, which said the highest-income affordable cohort should get 20%, not 50% of the affordable units.

Yes, this is 100% affordable, or income-linked, while the rental buildings were supposed to be 50% market, 30% moderate- and middle-income, and 20% low-income. But it's being matched by a 100% unaffordable condo building launching Tuesday.

And while, as noted in Crain's, a third all-affordable building will start in June, they don't mention that the next three towers after that likely will be all market-rate.

Given the imbalance in the next two all-affordable buildings, that means the overall Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park package would be less affordable to average Brooklynites than ever before.

From Downtown Brooklyn to a new neighborhood

Once they called it "A Vision For Downtown Brooklyn," as in the flyer at right, which avoided the project's scale and depicted the towers as smudges as viewed on high.

Now it's a neighborhood.

As I've said before, Atlantic Yards is a never-say-never project. It's not even Atlantic Yards any more. But it's not a neighborhood either.

















































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.