Skip to main content

Paterson meets with Atlantic Yards opponents, promises "objective and fair hearing" (but what does that mean now?)

So, as the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) moves forward with Atlantic Yards, can the man in charge of the agency, Governor David Paterson--once a public opponent of eminent domain (as DDDB's Daniel Goldstein reminds us), now a tacit supporter of Atlantic Yards--do anything?

Well, at least he's listening. Last night, before a "community conversation" at the First A.M.E. Zion Church in Bedford-Stuyvesant, organized by local elected officials. Paterson held a hastily-called meeting with a small group of Atlantic Yards opponents.

(Photos by Tracy Collins; set)

He promised them "an objective and fair hearing"--seemingly meaningless (and too late) boilerplate given that state agencies like the ESDC and Metropolitan Transportation Authority have already been charged to do so and have vigorously defended their actions in court after being sued.

Also, with a bond sale in the works, surely others in the administration would tell Paterson that the horse is about to leave the barn and stopping the project would lead to a huge legal mess. Then again, there's a serious argument--as per Nicole Gelinas--that the bond sale is risky, thus giving Paterson some cover, should he invoke his maverick streak.

(What could he do? Tell the ESDC not to pursue eminent domain? Stall the bond sale?)

The meeting

Paterson's staff organized the meeting with less than a day's notice, in response to communications from Council Member Letitia James. Later, in the segment of the meeting acknowledging local elected officials, Paterson dubbed James "the ghost of Atlantic Yards."

In her brief public remarks, James eschewed direct mention of AY but said, "We need development which is in the best interests of the city and state and which will not increase our debt."

The AY question

The Atlantic Yards question came not from one of the several AY activists in the crowd--well outnumbered by hundreds of neighborhood folk--but from Mary Alice Miller, a writer for Our Time Press and a Room 8 blogger.

"Would you tell us how you feel about giving 1.5 billion dollars in tax-free bonds in order to build Atlantic Yards, build a stadium that would create part-time jobs, and there's no promise that affordable housing would be built?" Miller asked.

Actually, there would be only $500 million in tax-free bonds; the state says there would be 4538 new jobs, but that depends significantly on the building of an office tower.

Other full-time jobs, in retail and building services, depend on the construction of housing towers and, under one scenario acknowledged by the ESDC, only one may be built in the near term.



(Video by Tracy Collins)

Paterson's response

Paterson responded, "In the case of Atlantic Yards, a committee of advocates who are opposed to the Atlantic Yards decision met with me right here in this church prior to this meeting. And I have promised them an objective and fair hearing on the issue."

He seemed to be focusing on the decision last week by the Court of Appeals in the Atlantic Yards eminent domain case rather than the project as a whole. He thus bypassed Miller's specific questions about bonds, housing, and jobs.

"We cannot reverse the Court of Appeals decision," Paterson said. "But whether the state has an interest in Atlantic Yards is something that to this point we have, but, upon advisement from Council Member James, we will review it."

Whether the state has an interest in Atlantic Yards is something that to this point we have? The state has invested $100 million and is backing it to the hilt.

As the video shows, Paterson's statement drew some healthy applause, but only a relative fraction of the audience applauded. (No one, as far as I could tell, booed or otherwise expressed disagreement, however.) The crowd was far more enthusiastic about issues closer to home.

What might happen

"He said he'd have independent, disinterested individuals take another look," James said afterward. "I await the review, because individuals on his staff have privately indicated that this project is not in the best interests of the state."

However, James acknowledged, Paterson has indicated to staffers that "he can't rescind the state's commitment."

Which doesn't leave him much room.

More on the event

While Paterson's been battered in the polls, it was a friendly audience, where speakers invoked Comptroller Bill Thompson's better-than-the-polls mayoral race to support Paterson's bid for a full term as governor. "Run, David, Run," the crowd chanted at one point.

Speaking without notes (obviously; he described himself as "I'm black, I'm blind, and I'm still alive"), Paterson took a place not at the podium but at the pew level of the church, allowing for a more intimate exchange. He asserted that New York has been far more fiscally responsible than other states, which are cutting vital services.

He even vetoed a bill he had proposed as a legislator, deeming the cost of a bill on lead paint removal too high, but later established a task force to address the issues.

And when James, in greeting the audience, said Paterson should not enact cuts in social services but instead tax the rich, he responded, "we are doing that right now."

He took some tough questions, including ones about teacher tenure, AIDS, and affordable housing. But, as NY1 reported, it was a comfortable setting for the governor who never sought the job.

Comments

  1. It's clear to me (I wasn't there) that Paterson made his comments as a favor to James and as a way to defuse the issue at the meeting. I doubt that he even knows where the project is located.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There is plenty the Governor can do to stop the project. It is just a matter of if he has the political guts to do it.

    My surmise is that it would help him with the only political figures that really matter in the end -- the voters.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

"There is no alternative": DM Glen on de Blasio's affordable housing strategy

As I've written, Mayor Bill de Blasio sure knows how to steer and spin coverage of his affordable housing initiatives.

Indeed, his latest announcement, claiming significant progress, came with a pre-press release op-ed in the New York Daily News and then a friendly photo-op press conference with an understandably grateful--and very lucky--winner of an affordable housing lottery.

To me, though, the most significant quote came from Deputy Mayor Alicia Glen, who, as the Wall Street Journal reported:
said public housing had been “starved” of federal support for years now, leaving the city with fewer ways of creating affordable housing. “Are we relying too heavily on the private sector?” she said. “There is no alternative.” Though Glen was using what she surely sees as a common-sense phrase, it recalls the slogan of a politician with whom I doubt de Blasio identifies: former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a Conservative who believed in free markets.

It suggests the limits to …