Skip to main content

Would AY be finished by 2015? The Times resists a correction

Would the Atlantic Yards project be finished by 2015, rather than the officially projected 2016 or a more-likely later date? That's what a reader could conclude after reading the 7/1/07 New York Times Metro section article headlined (online) Official Sees Possible Risk in Big Project in Brooklyn.

One paragraph in the article stated:
The project’s 16 towers are scheduled to open in several increments, beginning in July 2009 with the completion of the signature tower, known as Miss Brooklyn, at Flatbush and Atlantic Avenues, and concluding in April 2015 with a condo tower at Dean Street and Carlton Avenue.

Evidence to the contrary

As I pointed out in a correction request copied to two Times editors and two reporters, that may be the schedule according to one of the documents examined among those released to Assemblyman Jim Brennan and State Senator Velmanette Montgomery after they sued the Empire State Development Corporation. However, the project has long been described as concluding in 2016, under the best-case scenario.

The FAQ on the official Atlantic Yards web site states:
Q: What is the expected timeline for construction?
A: After the EIS is complete, and assuming the project receives the needed public approvals, FCRC anticipates breaking ground in late 2007 on the arena and at least two residential buildings. The construction will be phased over 10 years.


Also, the construction schedule that is part of the state's Final Environmental Impact Statement has three buildings going up in 2016.

Times response

I got the following response from reporter Nicholas Confessore:
The story in question makes clear that we are referring to a specific set of documents and to dates contained in those documents. The documents we relied on cite the dates in question, and our entire story is an extrapolation and analysis of those documents. Before diving into the details, we make clear that the documents “represent only one snapshot of an ever-evolving, much-delayed project.”

Thank you for the URL citations. You may rest assured, however, that Andy [Newman] and I are aware of Forest City’s current projections. Of course, no really knows with certainty when or if this project will be completed, a point I believe you have hit upon in your own writing.

You may consider this your official response from Karin Roberts, Greg Brock, Andy Newman, and myself.


My response

I wrote back to Confessore, in part:
Of course no one knows for certain. But if the official projections from the developer and the state say 2016, I think readers are disserved if not informed of that, especially given the declarative phrasing of the sentence at issue.

A closer look

In the 41-paragraph article, Paragraph 16 did explain that the documents represent only one snapshot of an ever-evolving, much-delayed project that still faces several lawsuits and has yet to begin rising in Brooklyn.
(Emphases added)

Paragraphs 17 through 21 each mentioned the documents as a source. In Paragraph 22, the Times again acknowledged that the plans were conditional:
Forest City itself would earn a development fee of 5 percent of the project’s total cost: roughly $200 million if the entire project is built as planned.


Paragraph 23 referred to the company’s assessment of Brooklyn’s residential market and the project’s construction costs.

However, Paragraph 24--cited at the top of this article--lacked any conditionality. As noted, it was declarative: The project’s 16 towers are scheduled to open in several increments... concluding in April 2015...

Given the official schedule of a 2016 completion date, and the doubts about that timetable expressed by project advocates like Chuck Ratner of parent Forest City Enterprises and project landscape architect Laurie Olin, the Times should have associated the 2015 date with the documents and added some skepticism.

"Excessive shorthand"

Though the error, in a sense, supports Forest City Ratner's optimistic timetable rather than a more skeptical view, I assume sloppiness, not nefariousness, on the part of the Times left readers with a misleading impression.

A correction is in order, especially given the Times's obligation to exactingly cover Forest City Ratner, business partner with the parent New York Times Company on the new Times Tower.

The Times's Public Editor, Clark Hoyt, in his 7/8/07 column, quoted the paper's foreign editor as acknowledging that the Times had been sloppy and used "excessive shorthand" in some instances while referring to Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia. This case is not dissimilar.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

No, security guards can't ban photos. Questions remain about visibility of ID/sticker system.

The bi-monthly Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Community Update meeting June 14, held at 55 Hanson Place, addressed multiple issues, including delays in the project, a new detente with project neighbors,concerns about traffic congestion, upcoming sewer work and demolitions, and an explanation of how high winds caused debris to fly off the under-construction 38 Sixth Avenue building. I'll have more coverage.
Security issues came up several times at the meeting.
Wayne Bailey, a resident who regularly takes photos and videos (that I often use) of construction/operations issues that impact residents, asked representatives of Tishman Construction if the security guard at the sites they're building works for them.
After Tishman Senior VP Eric Reid said yes, Bailey asked why a guard told him not to shoot video of the site, even though he was on a public street.

"I will address it with principals for that security firm," Reid said.
Forest City Ratner executive Ashley Cotton, the …

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park graphic: what's built/what might be coming (post-dated pinned post)

Click on graphic to enlarge. This is post-dated to stay at the top of the blog. It will be updated as announced configurations change and buildings launch. The August 2014 tentative configurations proposed by developer Greenland Forest City Partners will change, and the project is already well behind that tentative timetable.


Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…