Skip to main content

Crain's poll questions were stunning generalities--and described the CBA as a negotiation

So Crain's New York Business has posted the full results of the poll it commissioned regarding Atlantic Yards.

The conclusion: when asked about the project in stunning generalities, especially deceptive ones about the Community Benefits Agreement, people approve of it. (Yes, polls are by nature general, but we should have gone beyond "jobs, housing, and hoops" by now.)

That's about it, until someone conducts a more specific poll that actually addresses issues of density, public responsibility, facts and promises about affordable housing, and the use of eminent domain.

Below, the poll details, with some comments interpolated.

Respondents 601

1)How closely have you been following news about the Atlantic Yards development project: very closely, fairly closely, not too closely, or not at all?
1) Very closely 6%
2) Fairly closely 14%
3) Not too closely 21%
4) Not at all 56%
9) Don't Know/No Response/Refused 2%

Very/Fairly closely 20%
Not too closely/Not at all 78%

So most people are uninformed. The poll informs them only slightly more, but its inadequate information is what they'll have to rely on.

2)The proposal calls for seventeen buildings, including residential housing, a Nets arena and office buildings in Brooklyn, on 22 acres near Atlantic Ave. which currently have MTA rail yards, empty lots, low rise apartments, abandoned buildings and condos.

Are you very favorable, somewhat favorable, somewhat unfavorable or very unfavorable to this project?
1) Very favorable 23%
2) Somewhat favorable 37%
3) Somewhat unfavorable 13%
4) Very unfavorable 13%
9) Don't Know/No Response/Refused 15%

Very/Somewhat favorable 60%
Very/Somewhat unfavorable 25%

Here are things people have said about this project.

3)There will be significant costs to the city, including more schools and water and sewer services. Does this raise very serious doubts, serious doubts, some doubts or no doubts about it for you?
1) Very serious doubts 14%
2) Serious doubts 20%
3) Some doubts 26%
4) No doubts 35%
9) Don't Know/No Response/Refused 4%

Very serious/Serious doubts 34%
Some/No doubts 62%

Why not try to quantify the costs--in the billions--and to point out that the costs are not simply city services that any development might create but also subsidies and tax breaks?

4)The project is out of scale with the neighborhood - the buildings are taller, including a 62-story office tower, and it will promote gentrification. Does this raise very serious doubts, serious doubts, some doubts or no doubts about it for you?
1) Very serious doubts 11%
2) Serious doubts 18%
3) Some doubts 29%
4) No doubts 37%
9) Don't Know/No Response/Refused 5%

Very serious/Serious doubts 29%
Some/No doubts 67%

How about saying that the scale is out of line with city zoning? Or that it will promote gentrification even though its backers say it won't? Then again, the poll quotes "things people have said" about AY, rather than approaching clarity.

5)The city's land-use review process was not used to consult the surrounding community. Does this raise very serious doubts, serious doubts, some doubts or no doubts about it for you?
1) Very serious doubts 16%
2) Serious doubts 24%
3) Some doubts 32%
4) No doubts 23%
9) Don't Know/No Response/Refused 6%

Very serious/Serious doubts 40%
Some/No doubts 55%

Do people know what the process is? What if it was pointed out that the city process would require four public hearings and a vote by the City Council, while the fast-track state process involves one poorly-managed public hearing, two follow-up community forums (one on the day of the primary election).

Here are some other things people have said about this project.

Notice how the last three questions are all positive things. Also notice how there's much less middle-ground--the equivalent of "some doubts" above is "not an important benefit" below.

6)The project will provide 2,250 low-, moderate-, and middle-income rental apartments. Is this a very important benefit, an important benefit, not an important benefit or no benefit at all?
1) Very important benefit 46%
2) Important benefit 37%
3) Not an important benefit 7%
4) No benefit at all 7%
9) Don't Know/No Response/Refused 3%

Very important/Important benefit 83%
Not important/No benefit at all 14%

And who exactly would be eligible for those apartments?

7)The developers negotiated with neighborhood groups and agreed to provide affordable housing and construction jobs for local residents. Is this a very important benefit, an important benefit, not an important benefit or no benefit at all?
1) Very important benefit 51%
2) Important benefit 35%
3) Not an important benefit 6%
4) No benefit at all 6%
9) Don't Know/No Response/Refused 2%

Very important/Important benefit 86%
Not important/No benefit at all 12%

The developers negotiated? That's a highly-partial reading of the Community Benefits Agreement. For another interpretation, try Good Jobs New York.

8)The project will bring professional sports back to Brooklyn with the Nets arena. Is this a very important benefit, an important benefit, not an important benefit or no benefit at all?
1) Very important benefit 24%
2) Important benefit 34%
3) Not an important benefit 24%
4) No benefit at all 16%
9) Don't Know/No Response/Refused 3%

Very important/Important benefit 58%
Not important/No benefit at all 40%

9) After hearing this, are you very favorable, somewhat favorable, somewhat unfavorable or very unfavorable to the Atlantic Yards project?
1) Very favorable 30%
2) Somewhat favorable 41%
3) Somewhat unfavorable 13%
4) Very unfavorable 11%
9) Don't Know/No Response/Refused 5%

Very/Somewhat favorable 71%
Very/Somewhat unfavorable 24%

"After hearing this" suggests that the last three positives are the dispositive issues.


Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

No, security guards can't ban photos. Questions remain about visibility of ID/sticker system.

The bi-monthly Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Community Update meeting June 14, held at 55 Hanson Place, addressed multiple issues, including delays in the project, a new detente with project neighbors,concerns about traffic congestion, upcoming sewer work and demolitions, and an explanation of how high winds caused debris to fly off the under-construction 38 Sixth Avenue building. I'll have more coverage.
Security issues came up several times at the meeting.
Wayne Bailey, a resident who regularly takes photos and videos (that I often use) of construction/operations issues that impact residents, asked representatives of Tishman Construction if the security guard at the sites they're building works for them.
After Tishman Senior VP Eric Reid said yes, Bailey asked why a guard told him not to shoot video of the site, even though he was on a public street.

"I will address it with principals for that security firm," Reid said.
Forest City Ratner executive Ashley Cotton, the …

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park graphic: what's built/what might be coming + FAQ (post-dated pinned post)

This graphic, posted in February 2018, is post-dated to stay at the top of the blog. It will be updated as announced configurations change and buildings launch. Note the unbuilt B1 and the proposed--but not yet approved--shift in bulk to the unbuilt Site 5.

The August 2014 tentative configurations proposed by developer Greenland Forest City Partners will change. The project is already well behind that tentative timetable.

How many people are expected?

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park has a projected 6,430 apartments housing 2.1 persons per unit (as per Chapter 4 of the 2006 Final Environmental Impact Statement), which would mean 13,503 new residents, with 1,890 among them in low-income affordable rentals, and 2,835 in moderate- and middle-income affordable rentals.

That leaves 8,778 people in market-rate rentals and condos, though let's call it 8,358 after subtracting 420 who may live in 200 promised below-market condos. So that's 5,145 in below-market units, though many of them won…

The passing of David Sheets, Dean Street renter, former Freddy's bartender, eminent domain plaintiff, and singular personality

David Sheets, longtime Dean Street renter, Freddy's bartender, eminent domain plaintiff, and singular personality, died 1/17/18 in HCA Greenview Hospital in Bowling Green, KY. He was 56.

There are obituary notices in the Bowling Green Daily News and the Wichita Eagle, which state:
He was born in Wichita, KS where he attended public Schools and Wichita State University. He lived for many years in Brooklyn, NY, and was employed as a legal assistant. David's hobby was cartography and had an avid interest in Mass Transit Systems of the world. David was predeceased by his father, Kenneth E. Sheets. He is survived by his mother, Wilma Smith, step-brother, Billy Ray Smith and his wife, Jane all of Bowling Green; step-sister, Ellen Smith Alexander and her husband, Jerry of Bella Vista, AR; several cousins and step-nieces and step-nephews also survive. Memorial Services will be on Monday, January 22, 2018 at 1:00 pm with visitation from 10:00 am to 1:00 pm Monday at Johnson-Vaughn-Phe…

Some skepticism on Belmont hockey deal: lease value seems far below Aqueduct racino; unclear (but large?) cost for LIRR service

As I wrote for The Bridge 12/20/1, The Islanders Say Bye to Brooklyn, But Where Next?, the press conference announcing a new arena at Belmont Park for the New York Islanders was "long on pomp... but short on specifics."

Notably, a lease valued at $40 million "upfront to lease up to 43 acres over 49 years... seems like a good deal on rent for the state-controlled property." Also, the Long Island Rail Road will expand service to Belmont.

That indicates public support for an arena widely described as "privately financed," but how much? We don't know yet, but some more details--or at least questions--have emerged.

An Aqueduct comparable?

Well, we don't know what the other bid was, and there aren't exactly parcels that large offering direct comparables.

But consider: Genting New York LLC in September 2010 was granted a franchise to operate a video lottery terminal under a 30 year lease on 67 acres at Aqueduct Park (as noted by Gov. Andrew Cuomo).


Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…