Skip to main content

Off the charts: ANHD Cheat Sheet offers damning context for Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park "affordable housing"

Not-so-affordable "affordable housing," anybody? Subsidized housing aimed at a tiny fraction of some of the city's best-off residents?

The Association for Neighborhood Housing and Development (ANHD) has put together a very useful "Cheat Sheet" regarding the all-important issue of Area Median Income (AMI) levels, key to affordable housing.

Half the units in next two "affordable"
buildings aimed around this tiny cohort
In doing so, it offers context regarding the Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park affordable housing, in which some 390 units--nearly two-thirds of the units (65%)--in the next two "100% affordable" buildings will go to middle-income households who represent just a fraction of the city's population, and among the least needy.

The Cheat Sheet explains how each AMI % translates to:
  • A household income amount for a four-person household. 
  • A monthly rent for a two-bedroom apartment.
  • The % of New Yorkers at each AMI level. 
It's not easy to read--click to enlarge--but the key thing to recognize is that only 9.2% of city households are moderate income, with only 1.75% at 160%, the highest middle income level.

That means annual income of about $138,000 for a four-person household and rent of approximately $3,500 for a two-bedroom unit.

And a good chunk of the coming Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park affordable housing is even fractionally less affordable. Fully 50% of the subsidized units in the upcoming B14 (535 Carlton) and B3 (38 Sixth Avenue) towers will go to households at 165% of AMI.

Another 15% will go to another middle-income cohort, at 145% of AMI, with two-bedroom units exceeding $3,000. (Rents go down, of course, for smaller units and smaller households.)
Note: It does not break down each income level into smaller households and commensurate lower rents.

Looking at mayor's plan

As I've written, in Mayor Bill de Blasio's ambitious plan to build or preserve 200,000 affordable units, only 11% --not 65%, as in the next two towers--are supposed to go to middle-income households.

Not that the goal has been met. Politico NY on 1/11/15  recently offered an update on the Mayor's plan, noting that so far a greater proportion of middle-income units have been launched. It quoted a critic:
Jonathan Westin of the coalition "Real Affordability For All" criticized the income breakdown.
"City Hall’s own press release reveals that little progress has been made: only 5 percent of the so-called affordable housing units are going to families living in poverty—those earning 30 percent or less of Area Median Income (AMI)," Westin said. "Mayor de Blasio’s housing and rezoning plans give most low-income New Yorkers nothing to celebrate or cheer. Too many low-income people are still at risk of displacement and homelessness in de Blasio's New York."


Why AMI is off

A blog post pointing to the Cheat Sheet--written by Barika Williams, Deputy Director, ANHD (who also happens to be a member of the Atlantic Yards Community Development Corporation)--explains why the federally-set AMI methodology is especially off-base in New York City.


It explains why federal Department of Housing and Urban Development AMIs for New York City exceed actual median incomes:
  • wealthier suburban counties are included.
  • HUD adds an upward adjuster onto New York income limits, based on the high cost of housing here, which artificially lifted AMI by 26.1% in 2010
  • HUD uses a formula to set income for different housing sizes, but the reality (a single person household earns just 49% of a four-person household) does not match the formula (70%)
This orients studios and one-bedrooms even more to the middle class.



Differences by borough

There are also significant differences by borough, with median incomes for the Bronx and Brooklyn--at least at the time of this report--well below Staten Island and Manhattan.

That means that "affordable housing would need to be developed at about the 50% and 70% AMI levels, respectively, to be affordable to the median households in each borough." (That's far from Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, of course.)


Mismatches by Community District

The report notes:
The mismatch between HUD’s Area Median Incomes and the actual median incomes at the City and borough levels are especially true when looking neighborhood by­ neighborhood. Figure 7 shows each Community District’s median income as a percentage of AMI. Two-­thirds, or 40 of the 59 Community Districts in the City, have median incomes at or below the “Low ­Income” limit of 80% of AMI. And every single Community District in New York City, even the wealthiest, has a median income less than the “Middle­ Income” limit of 165% of AMI.


The solutions, of course, aren't simple, but this observation should resonate:
There is a clear need for more housing options throughout the City, across all income levels. However if these options aren’t affordable, the “affordable housing” is simply “housing.” The City should not use taxpayer subsidies to build housing unaffordable to the local community – indeed unaffordable to the majority of New Yorkers overall – and then call it “affordable housing.”
(Emphasis added)

But it has such a nice ring to it, leaving elected officials willing to praise "affordable housing" devoid from context, as happened last June.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.