Skip to main content

Who's responsible for late-night lights at the Vanderbilt Yard? In Final SEIS, ESD blames MTA

It's confusing, and confounding.

Disturbing late-night lighting appears at or near the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's Vanderbilt Yard, and it's not clear each time who's responsible, or whether anything can be done.

Last night, for example, as noted on Atlantic Yards Watch, high-intensity floodlights were on with no notice, disturbing residents of the nearby Newswalk building across Pacific Street. (Here's video.) Lights were on all night.

Was that Atlantic Yards work? Long Island Rail Road work? Unclear.

Update 2:55 pm: MTA spokesman Adam Lisberg says, "We were not doing any work there last night. We are investigating whether we inadvertently left lights on that were required for earlier work. In the future, our crews will work carefully to ensure that all construction lights are extinguished once we no longer need them."

The lighting--never before needed before Atlantic Yards, residents say--was described as "brutally high intensity" in comments on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Draft SEIS).

ESD: it's not Atlantic Yards

In the Response to Comments chapter of the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement issued and approved last week, Empire State Development (ESD), the state agency overseeing/shepherding Atlantic Yards, eschewed all responsibility:
As described in Chapter 3F, “Construction Urban Design,” as per the MEC [Memorandum of Environmental Commitments], any lighting on interim construction staging and parking areas must be equipped with directional lighting angled to limit light intrusion beyond the site, and must employ controls to reduce lighting during periods when the facility is not in active use, consistent with site security. Furthermore, any construction lighting on individual construction sites would be directional, and angled to limit light intrusion beyond the site itself. As described in Chapter 3A, “Construction Overview,” no regular night work is expected to be required for Phase II construction except at limited times when foundation and construction work for the platform deck over the existing LIRR yard is required to avoid interference with yard operations of the LIRR. However, MTA conducts routine rail work (unrelated to the Project) which may require nighttime lighting. As this routine yard work by MTA is not subject to the Project’s MEC, it does not operate under the same lighting limitations.
Two gaps

That's a legalistic but not particularly helpful response. Shouldn't ESD and developer Forest City Ratner, wanting to be good neighbors, at least communicate and coordinate with MTA regarding such issues?

Also, there are two gaps in that description. First, the foundation and construction work for the platform deck may represent "at limited times" in comparison to a potential 25-year project construction schedule, it still could represent a substantial amount of time.

Also, there has been Atlantic Yards-related night work requiring high-intensity lighting, such as exploratory work in April for the West Portal railyard project, at Sixth and Atlantic avenues.

At the latest Atlantic Yards Quality of Life Committee meeting, residents on both sides of the railyard complained about overnight light and noise.

Forest City Ratner External Affairs VP Ashley Cotton suggested residents had not gotten the two-week Construction Alerts, which stated that the city Department of Transportation required the work to be done at night.

However, the alerts did not explain that the work would require floodlights and beeping noise.

Also, as I pointed out, the work began, at least according to Forest City, on the evening of March 25, as disclosed in a Supplemental Report (sent by AtlanticYards.com, not ESD) to the March 17 two-week look-ahead, which had not alerted anybody to such night work. 

The sequence seems suspicious. Surely Forest City knew eight days earlier that night work was planned.

However, that Supplemental Report was circulated on March 26 the day after the work was supposed to begin. (The disclosure did continue in the two-week look-aheads dated March 31 and April 14.)

Where's MTA?

Some at the Quality of Life Committee meeting raised questions about the MTA's role.

"I asked for MTA to be at this meeting," said Dean Street resident Peter Krashes. "The fact that they're not here--they're the entity the work is happening on behalf of. They're the entity that oversees construction."

"We've been talking to the MTA," added Paula Roy, who oversees the project for ESD, from the audience.

"It’s insulting to us for them not to show up," Krashes continued. "It's insulting for ESD to allow it. Not everyone can have a scheduling problem."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.