Skip to main content

Busy Atlantic Yards week awaits: approvals before MTA and ESD; joint venture likely to be finalized; later, hearing on federal lawsuit

Though the one public recent public hearing on Atlantic Yards--to solicit comments on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Draft SEIS)--is long over, there are three agency meetings next week to consider and approve aspects of the Atlantic Yards plan.

At each, public comment will be accepted, if not necessarily taken particularly seriously. Given that the governor controls Empire State Development (ESD), and the governor and mayor control the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), Forest City Ratner's plans are, historically, in the bag.

Then again, the MTA typically includes a few more independent directors who might raise some questions.

Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Monday, June 23: the MTA's LIRR Committee will discuss Forest City Ratner's proposal to accelerate building of the platform needed for vertical development over the Vanderbilt Yard, while asking for 15 months' delay in the required completion of a permanent railyard. The Committee materials should be posted sometime Friday.

MTA Headquarters, 347 Madison Avenue (44th-45th Streets), 5th Floor Board Room. 9:30 am.

Wednesday, June 25: the MTA's full board will discuss (and, I'd bet, approve) the above-mentioned plan. The Board materials should be posted Friday.

MTA Headquarters, 347 Madison Avenue (44th-45th Streets), 5th Floor Board Room, 10 am.

Empire State Development

Friday, June 27: ESD will (I'm sure) approve a revision to the Modified General Project Plan, which would shift bulk from Phase 1 to Phase 2 and reduce parking onsite from 3,670 spaces to either 2,896 parking spaces or (I'd bet) 1,200 spaces.

ESD headquarters, 633 Third Avenue, 37th Floor Conference Room. The Board materials and time of meeting (likely 9:30 am or 10 am) should be posted the day before. RSVP will be required one day before.

Revised Final SEIS needed?

One lingering question is whether they need to issue a revised Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement because they left out one of my comments, regarding the failure to study hockey crowds as a worst-case scenario for traffic and parking. The answer, apparently, is no.

As I reported, I publicly told the ESD board that a comment was missing, and they ignored it. A day later, as I reported, I was told:
We have since reviewed the quarantined emails and have determined that your single email was the only email relating to the FSEIS flagged by our system and not delivered. We regret that this occurred, but the issue identified in your comment was considered during the SEQRA review process, and we will inform the Directors about it before they meet to make any final decisions on this matter.
I asked if "the issue identified in [my] comment was considered during the SEQRA review process," should it not have been included in the Response to Comments document?

I was told no, sort of:
The FSEIS considered the reasonable worst case scenario and was complete as accepted and approved by the Directors last week – next week, the Directors will be asked to adopt the SEQRA findings and affirm modifications to the GPP.
It's not clear to me that the Final SEIS did consider the reasonable worst case scenario, because it ignored hockey.

But I expect the issue to be massaged, since the State Environmental Quality Review Act allows the balancing of adverse environmental impacts with other issues:
A positive findings statement means that the project or action is approvable after consideration of the final EIS, and demonstrates that the action chosen is the one that avoids or minimizes adverse environmental impacts presented in the EIS and weighs and balances them with the social, economic and other essential considerations. If the action is not approvable, a negative findings statement documenting the reasons for the denial must be prepared.
The Greenland deal

Another lingering question: must ESD approve the joint venture? Does ESD have to approve Forest City's emerging joint venture with the Chinese government-owned Greenland Group, which has agreed to buy 70% of Atlantic Yards going forward, excluding the arena and the first tower?

At the 4/30/14 hearing on the Draft SEIS, ESD CEO Kenneth Adams said no. The next morning, I got a more ambiguous statement from ESD, saying the issue was under review.

I haven't gotten any further clarification, despite a request. I'd bet that no approval is needed, but that saying that is not politically prudent.

Assuming everything passes on June 27, I'd expect Forest City Ratner and Greenland will issue a triumphant press release about their new partnership.

A court hearing in July

A less triumphant event should be an oral argument in federal court on 7/3/14 on a motion to dismiss most of the case filed against Forest City Ratner and Community Benefits Agreement signatory Brooklyn United for Innovative Local Development (BUILD) by participants in a coveted training program who say they were promised construction jobs and union cards.

I expect to write a preview of the case before the hearing.

Update: the case will be heard Friday, July 11, 2014 at 12:00 PM in courtroom 6C South.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.