Skip to main content

Atlantic Yards kabuki: ESD board approves Final SEIS as "complete," despite being told of gap

Updated 4:30 pm June 13 with statement at bottom.

Faced with clear evidence today that the court-ordered Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Final SEIS) was not complete, given the failure to acknowledge at least one submitted comment, what did the board of Empire State Development, the state authority overseeing/shepherding Atlantic Yards, do?

Did they:
  1. ask questions of staff or the commenter presenting evidence
  2. raise concerns as to whether the Final SEIS was in fact complete with respect to scope, content, and adequacy
  3. ignore the issue and then offer rubber-stamp approval of the document
Answer: 3.

Unsurprising, yet still dismaying, especially since I was the person who brought the issue to their attention. (The board also faced a hinted threat of a lawsuit regarding the failure to ensure a faster construction schedule than 25 years.)

Why I spoke: they missed a comment

I didn't go to today's meeting expecting to speak.

After all, it was clear that ESD would rubber-stamp the Final SEIS, which must be approved before any construction can proceed on the Phase 2 Atlantic Yards site, east of Sixth Avenue.

(Developer Forest City Ratner, with its new Chinese-government owned joint venture partner/overseer, the Greenland Group, has announced plans to start construction of two towers on the southeast block of the project site, currently used for interim surface parking.)

And it's clear that ESD will rubber-stamp business changes to the Modified General Project Plan--which also will ease construction of Phase 2--at its next full meeting, announced today as occurring on June 27.

But ESD, under the administration of Chairman/CEO Ken Adams, has actually begun to release relevant documents one day ahead of board meetings, thus making public comment potentially less less irrelevant. (Previously, the public was welcome to comment on documents they hadn't been able to review.)

Sure, only obsessives might try to read/skim a giant document--put together by the elves at uber-consulting firm AKRF--in less than 24 hours. But I tried.

And I noticed that, the Response to Comments chapter made reference to two comments I filed directly, but not to a third comment--one I sent twice, to make sure it was received.

(I hadn't planned to file comments on the Draft SEIS, but I saw it as a way to get journalistic questions answered.)

What about hockey?

My question concerned whether it was appropriate to treat Brooklyn Nets games as the reasonable worst-case scenario for traffic and parking now that we know that large numbers of people from Long Island will be coming to the arena after the New York Islanders hockey team moves to Brooklyn in 2015.

It's a reasonable question.

Was anything else missed?

As I told the board, the failure to even acknowledge the question as filed made me wonder if any other comments or questions were missed, and whether they could accept and approve the Final SEIS when there appear to be gaps.

I handed in copies of my testimony as well as a copy of an email sent twice to ESD.

Crickets.

My concern is not unprecedented. In November 2006, those of us with long AY memories recall, the ESD board--then known as ESDC--approved the Atlantic Yards Final Environmental Impact Statement as complete.

Then it  had to re-approve a revised version that acknowledged numerous comments from Prospect Heights resident Raul Rothblatt that had been ignored.

So, based on that pattern, it's certainly plausible that, at the June 27 meeting, the board will be asked to re-approve a slightly revised Final SEIS as "complete."

Update: A response from ESD, 4:30 pm, Friday, June 13:
Thank you for bringing to our attention that one of your three submitted comments was not addressed in the FSEIS. We searched our email system and found that your May 6, 2014, email had been quarantined, and thus had not reached our email inbox. Unfortunately, the email response that you received from staff confirming receipt of your three emails was sent in error. We have since reviewed the quarantined emails and have determined that your single email was the only email relating to the FSEIS flagged by our system and not delivered. We regret that this occurred, but the issue identified in your comment was considered during the SEQRA review process, and we will inform the Directors about it before they meet to make any final decisions on this matter.
I still don't think that means the Final SEIS was complete.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…