Skip to main content

Forest City's strategy in trainees' lawsuit? Blame BUILD/Caldwell & emphasize distance. But BUILD was close, compliant ally when needed.

The "modern blueprint"--the New York Times's fancifully deceptive claim about Forest City Ratner's efforts to "harvest" community support from groups mostly formed to "negotiate" Atlantic Yards--has devolved even further.

Remember the lawsuit filed by would-be construction workers who claim they were promised Atlantic Yards construction jobs and union cards after going through a coveted pre-apprenticeship training program (PATP) organized by Brooklyn United for Innovative Local Development (BUILD)?

It's moving toward an important oral argument, on May 30 [updated] on July 3 in federal court. In an effort to limit liability and potential payout, Forest City Ratner and affiliate companies, individual defendants Bruce Ratner and Jane Marshall, BUILD, and former CEO James Caldwell have asked for most of the case to be dismissed.

The strategy: the trainees may have been misled, but if so, it's BUILD's fault, because Caldwell and colleagues went rogue.

So far the main set of defense papers has been filed. Defense lawyers argue that Caldwell and others made promises to the trainees--20 of 36 have joined the class-action suit--that they couldn't back up. The PATP, lawyers say, distinctly diverged from Forest City's direction.

The upshot: if just Caldwell and the now-defunct BUILD are liable for the potential lost wages from a union career, well, that's not much of a payout.

But there's a complicating factor: at least some of the trainees claim that Forest City executive Marshall also made some promises.

Forest City's distance from BUILD

The plaintiffs' attorneys are arguing that Forest City--which funded but didn't direct the nonprofit BUILD--should be responsible for BUILD's promises.

In defense papers, Forest City vigorously attempts to distance itself from BUILD: it had no control over the PATP and "consistently ceded to BUILD's vision"-- an organization, it should be noted, with no track record in job training--"of how the program should be run."

Maybe that's true, though upcoming response papers from the plaintiffs' attorneys presumably will offer some countervailing evidence.

After all, Forest City is trying to have it both ways. If BUILD went rogue, that's partly because Forest City never hired the Independent Compliance Monitor required by the Community Benefits Agreement (CBA) to report back on the progress of initiatives like the PATP.

And the CBA, which Forest City and supporters have long called "historic," a "model," and transformative of the communities left behind in Brooklyn's boom, seems even more tainted.

Also, there's something icky about having one set of lawyers represent both Forest City and BUILD/Caldwell, with the latter--who agreed to have his former benefactors pay for the lawyers--getting all the blame.

When BUILD mattered

Notably, Forest City's attempt to distance itself from BUILD contrasts enormously with its use of the organization, and Caldwell, to establish community credibility. I can quickly count five examples, three of which I'll detail further:
  • FCR offered its offices to BUILD and others to organize the CBA, with Bruce Ratner thanking them for their support
  • One of five amicus briefs backing the defense in the Kelo vs. New London eminent domain case London came from BUILD, joined by the Rev. Herbert Daughtry and the Carpenters Union.
  • an advertisement featured Caldwell and other CBA signatories
  • a TV appearance by BUILD's Marie Louis
  • Forest City's provision of a p.r. spokesperson for BUILD
Beyond these, of course, BUILD regularly supplied supporters to cheer for the project at rallies and to testify at public hearings. Caldwell numerous times cheered Atlantic Yards and referred to Ratner as like "an angel sent from God."

Now, that angel is spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on attorneys' fees to avoid--presumably--having to pay out millions to poor people who claim they were rooked by the "modern blueprint."

Caldwell in the advertisement

Consider the below advertisement touting Forest City's deposit in the black-owned Carver Federal Savings Bank,with BUILD's Caldwell and other CBA signatories, the Rev. Herbert Daughtry and Bertha Lewis.

It appeared in the June/July 2005 edition of Forest City Ratner's promotional Brooklyn Standard "publication," as well as (I believe) some other local newspapers.

A deposit is fairly meaningless; Forest City was just parking its money there, not "giving back to the community." But Caldwell was there to send a message.

BUILD as preferred Forest City mouthpiece

When CUNY-TV host Brian Lehrer (best known for his WNYC radio show) called Forest City Ratner in September 2005 for someone to discuss Atlantic Yards, he was directed to BUILD.

"So when we called them, and told them we were going to do this segment and who would they like to refer us to as a spokesperson, they referred us to your group," Lehrer told BUILD Chief Operating Officer Marie Louis in the 9/21/05 segment, as noted by Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn.

"Because they know that we're, first of all, we're one of their partners now especially since we signed the Community Benefits Agreement," responded Louis. (She has since passed away.)

Forest City provides BUILD with mouthpiece

IRS documents suggested BUILD expected $5 million from Forest City. That wasn't true, but Forest City's spokesman and BUILD both lied when they said there had been no payment as of September 2005.

So BUILD and other CBA signatories needed a p.r. agent, Forest City hired one, though Caldwell at one point professed ignorance. The New York Observer reported 9/29/05:
As for the public relations firm that is representing them, Caldwell said he didn’t know who was paying them.
“The Terrie Williams Agency just called us up one day and said they would be doing our p.r.,” he said.
Back then, the relationship seemed a lot closer.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…