Skip to main content

The Draft SEIS offers illustrations of potential construction, but they don't predict schedule

Now that we know that Forest City Ratner and joint venture partner/overseer, the Greenland Group, plan one tower on the arena block and two on the southeast block, Block 1129, it's clear that the phasing plans presented in the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Draft SEIS) are, as warned, hardly illustrative.

It looks like they'll be building faster on Block 1129 than in any of the three scenarios presented--which are supposed to illustrate the potential impacts of delay-- but it's not clear whether and when open space--beyond courtyards for the two towers--will be available.

For now, some version of Construction Phasing Plan 1 or Plan 3 seems plausible, since they both start with construction (other than arena block construction) on that southeast block. However, documents indicate a plan to build a school in Phase 2, likely Building 15, which is east of Sixth Avenue between Dean and Pacific Streets.

That might come before Block 1129 is finished, but who knows. B15 requires the acquisition and demolition of existing, active residential buildings, as well as an industrial building.

From the document

According to Chapter 3A: Construction Overview:
This chapter frames the analyses that will assess whether the construction of Phase II of the Project under the Extended Build-Out Scenario and changed background conditions since the 2006 FEIS would result in any significant adverse impacts not previously disclosed, and whether any additional mitigation measures beyond those identified in the 2006 FEIS and the Amended Memorandum of Environmental Commitments (MEC) would be warranted and are practicable.

As discussed in more detail below, there are three illustrative construction phasing plans that are analyzed: Construction Phasing Plan 1—continuous sequential phasing with Block 1129 first; Construction Phasing Plan 2—continuous sequential phasing with Building 15 on Block 1128 first; and Construction Phasing Plan 3—start and stop sequential phasing with periods of more intense construction activities. These illustrative phasing plans are not intended to serve as a prediction of the exact schedule and sequence of the Phase II construction, but rather have been developed to illustrate how the timing of the construction of certain project components may vary and to provide for a reasonably conservative analysis of the range of environmental effects associated with a delayed build-out of Phase II. The three illustrative construction phasing plans serve as the basis of analysis in this chapter because they provide a range of potential impacts within the envelope of the reasonable worst-case construction schedule under the Extended Build-Out Scenario.
(Emphasis added)

Plan 1 Early Stage

Plan 1: Intermediate Stage


Plan 1: Late Stage


Plan 2: Early Stage


Plan 2: Intermediate Stage


Plan 2: Late Stage


Plan 3: Early Stage


Plan 3: Intermediate Stage


Plan 3: Late Stage


Average number of workers/trucks




Forget Phase 1

Note that the projections regarding workers and trucks are for Phase 2 only, and ignore any simultaneous work on the Phase 1 site, including Building 1 (replacing the temporary arena plaza) and Site 5 (currently occupied by P.C. Richard and Modell's). The document states:
For Construction Phasing Plan 1, the average number of workers throughout the entire period would be approximately 347 per day. The peak number of workers would be 793 per day, and would occur in the 3rd quarter of 2030 when construction of Building 10 and the platform over Block 1120 would be simultaneously occurring. For truck trips, the average number of trucks throughout the entire construction period would be 99 per day, and the peak would occur in the 3rd quarter of 2032 when construction of Buildings 5 and 6 and the platform over Building 7 would be simultaneously occurring, with 207 truck trips per day.

For Construction Phasing Plan 2, the average number of workers throughout the entire period would be approximately 347 per day. The peak number of workers would be 932 per day, and would occur in the 4th quarter of 2028 when construction of Buildings 8 and 9 and the platform over Block 1121 would be simultaneously occurring. For truck trips, the average number of trucks throughout the entire construction period would be 100 per day, and the peak would occur in the1st quarter of 2028 when construction of Buildings 7, 8, and 9 would be simultaneously occurring, with 210 truck trips per day.

For Construction Phasing Plan 3, the average number of workers throughout the entire period would be approximately 442 per day for the period when construction activities are occurring. The peak number of workers would be 1,356 per day, and would occur in the 1st quarter of 2032 when construction of Buildings 5, 9, and 10 and the platform over Block 1120 would be simultaneously occurring. For truck trips, the average number of trucks throughout the entire construction period would be 127 per day, and the peak would also occur in the 1st quarter of 2032, with 327 truck trips per day.
These of course are scenarios, not plans.

Regarding the platform

The document describes construction techniques, which differ whether construction is on terra firma or over the railyard:
Platforms would be built over the open, below-grade portions of the newly relocated Vanderbilt Yard. One platform would span over the below-grade portion of Block 1120 and a second platform would span over Block 1121. The platform would provide a base for the Phase II buildings on Blocks 1120 and 1121 (Buildings 5, 6, and 7 on Block 1120 and Buildings 8, 9, and 10 on Block 1121). The construction techniques and sequencing for both platforms would be basically the same. Columns and shear walls would be constructed on the mat foundations for future buildings. Large steel trusses, running north to south, would be supported by the columns and the shear walls. Concrete would be poured upon decking, which would have been placed on the steel trusses to form and finish the platform. Equipment that would be used during platform construction would include cranes, lift trucks, concrete pumps, compressors, and generators.

Buildings 11 through 15 would require excavation and foundation activities. Excavators and front end loaders would be used for the tasks of soil excavation. The soils would be loaded onto dump trucks for transport to a licensed disposal facility or for reuse on a construction site that needs fill. The dump trucks would be loaded in the excavation area itself, and a ramp may be built to the street level. Next, the concrete footings and walls would be erected and subsequently the cellar floor would be installed. A spread footing foundations system is expected to be used for the project buildings. In this type of foundation system, concrete column footings would be used to accommodate the concentrated load placed on them and to support the structure above. These concrete footings would be reinforced with rebar as they are traditionally done. Equipment that would also be used during excavation and foundation would also include the use of cranes, backhoes, drill rigs, bulldozers, concrete pumps, compressors, and generators.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.