Skip to main content

Ridge Hill trial opens, but mystery persists regarding Forest City Ratner's role in compensating accused consultant who paid accused Council Member

According to the opening statements yesterday by defense lawyers in a federal corruption trial, there are explanations for why Yonkers Council Member Sandy Annabi was given money by her distant cousin, Yonkers Republican Party Chair Zehy Jereis, and why she changed her vote to enable Forest City Ratner's Ridge Hill development.

Jereis was infatuated with her, and Annabi believed that changes in the Ridge Hill project--retail, residential, and more--finally made it worthwhile.

The question is whether those arguments--presaged in pretrial papers--is whether they add up. After all, Annabi has denied the romantic relationship purported (or perhaps merely pursued) by Jereis. And, as previously reported, those changes in Ridge Hill were small beer.

Defense lawyers went after the go-between regarding the second project, Longfellow, Anthony Mangone, who already pleaded guilty to funneling cash to Jereis to pay off Annabi.

The question is whether and how they will go after Forest City, three of whose former staffers are expected to be mentioned or to testify in the trial, which is expected to resume Tuesday.

From the Times

In an article today headlined Prosecutor Tells How Ex-Yonkers Councilwoman Got Secret Payments, the New York Times reported:
A lawyer for Ms. Annabi, William I. Aronwald, said in his opening remarks that Ms. Annabi had changed her vote, but only after Forest City Ratner agreed to improve its deal with Yonkers, paying it an additional $10 million, as well as $500,000 more for a traffic mitigation study.
Whatever Mr. Jereis was hoping that his payments to her would accomplish, Mr. Aronwald said, “it had absolutely nothing to do with her vote.” He said there was “no quid pro quo” for Ms. Annabi “to vote for either one of those two projects.”
Mr. Jereis’s lawyer, Anthony J. Siano, suggested to the jury that much of the government case would come from a disbarred lawyer, Anthony Mangone, who had pleaded guilty in the conspiracy and was cooperating with the government. Mr. Siano explained his client’s payments to Ms. Annabi as resulting from his romantic feelings for her. Mr. Siano said that Mr. Jereis had “spent a lot of money pursuing Ms. Annabi, not for her vote but for her body” and that he had appeared to have been “enthralled, infatuated, bewitched” by her.
Forest City Ratner has not been accused of wrongdoing in the case. It has said that it “cooperated fully with the U.S. attorney’s office during the course of its investigation and will continue to do so.”
Does cooperation mean they got a deal--testify and avoid prosecution? The developer may not have been accused of official wrongdoing, but the actions--giving Jereis a no-show job after Annabi changed her vote--sure look fishy.

From the Journal News

The Journal News described, in an article headlined Ex-councilwoman Annabi accused of 'repeated betrayal' of public trust as Yonkers corruption trial opens, what might be called a "stream of payments theory," which does not require proving that specific bribes be connected to specific actions:
The prosecution contends that, beginning with her election to the City Council a decade ago, Jereis made frequent payments to Annabi and on her behalf in an effort to control her conduct on the City Council.
There were $60,000 in downpayments on two homes Annabi bought and the monthly utility and maintenance payments for a third she had to buy because the others were not in her district. He helped her pay off student loans and gave her $10,000 for lease payments on a Mercedes-Benz....
Will Forest City representatives describe bribes? The defense said no:
The defense went much further, and insisted jurors would hear about bribes from the mouths of only three witnesses, Mangone and the Milios, who themselves just pleaded guilty to evading taxes on $2.1 million.
That could be because Forest City, in its thinking, was not paying bribes, just rewarding Jereis.

The Journal News's coverage provided some rebuttal for Aronwald's defense of Annabi's actions:
Aronwald said Annabi had opposed the project because the city would give away too much in tax abatements and the developer was not willing to budge on the traffic and environmental concerns surrounding the project. Annabi changed her mind when the developer agreed to pay an extra $10 million to the city and $500,000 for a traffic mitigation study.
[Assistant U.S. Attorney] Halperin said those fgures were a pittance to the developers and that the concessions were conceived as political cover for Annabi.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.