Skip to main content

Ask Why: Enron, "the diffusion of responsibility," and the Atlantic Yards parallels (will anyone look at the Development Agreement?)

Alex Gibney’s 2005 documentary, Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room, contains several memorable quotes, but the most apt one, at least for Atlantic Yards watchers, is not listed on the IMDB quotes page.

It comes from whistleblower Sherron Watkins, with only about five minutes left to go in the film:
“Enron should not be viewed as an aberration, something that can’t happen anywhere else. Because it’s all about the rationalization that you’re not doing anything wrong. We’ve involved [accountants] Arthur Andersen, we’ve involved the lawyers, the bankers know what we’re doing. There’s a sense--the diffusion of responsibility. Everyone was on the bandwagon. And it can happen again.”
So the message of the film is a reminder to take seriously Enron’s (ironic, in retrospect) slogan, "Ask Why."

And what about AY?

Atlantic Yards isn't Enron--right?--but who's responsible for taking responsibility and telling the truth?

Government agencies and courts have punted on numerous issues, most glaringly regarding the timetable implied in the belatedly-released Development Agreement, which contradicts earlier promises.

Remember, the release in January came six days after a hearing in a case challenging the Modified General Project Plan (MGPP) was heard in court. It was also about three weeks after the ESDC told me the documents would be made available.

Jobs

Forest City Ratner promises 8000 permanent jobs, a figure that relies on 1) an unrealistic configuration of office space and 2) a full buildout of the project.

Do government agencies take them to task? No, Mayor Mike Bloomberg happily parroted the figure in a press release.

And the Empire State Development Corporation, though itself estimating a number about half that total, backed FCR's calculations in a dispute refereed gently by the Washington Post.

Crime

Consulting firm AKRF solemnly pronounced that the Atlantic Yards site is most likely the source of crime in Sector E of the 88th Precinct. They never questioned the police beyond looking at general statistics.

Questioned more directly, the cops blamed Forest City Ratner's malls. That's borne out by weekly crime statistics.

Housing market

Consulting firm KPMG offered glaring lies about the percentage of sales in several prominent condo developments and stretched the figures regarding price per square foot.

Arena events

The arena sponsors most recently predicted over 200 events a year at the Barclays Center; ratings agency Moody's said there'd be 225 events but wouldn't defend its methodology.

As we've known for years, the original projection of 225 events a year depended on the closing of the Meadowlands Arena, now the Izod Center, and no construction of an arena in Newark.

Passing the buck

On March 11, I cited state Supreme Court Justice Marcy Friedman's decision in the case challenging the Empire State Development Corporation's (ESDC) 2009 approval of the Atlantic Yards Modified General Project Plan:
At this late juncture, petitioners’ redress is a matter for the political will, and not for this court which is constrained, under the limited standard for SEQRA review, to reject petitioners’ challenge.
From Governor David Paterson's statement in response to a question March 9:
"Since the project was already in implementation when I came into office, I waited for the Court of Appeals to make a decision, and they ruled the way they did."
That makes it look like, once Atlantic Yards got started, it had inevitable momentum. But that's not so. After all, as I noted, it was a pretty "late juncture" when, last year, Forest City Ratner renegotiated deals with the ESDC and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

The Development Agreement

And Friedman has since punted a case challenging the eminent domain Determination & Findings to Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Abraham Gerges, who previously dismissed a similar issue.

Gerges did not examine the belatedly-released Development Agreement. Friedman wouldn't add it to the record.

Nor did she allow it to be added to the record of the case challenging the ESDC's 2009 approval of the case. (She's been asked to revisit that case and add the Development Agreement to the record.)

What it means: 25 years

Let's be clear on what this means.

The June 2009 revised MTA deal for the Vanderbilt Yard gives Forest City Ratner 22 years to pay for the railyard, at a generous 6.5% interest rate, thus making it likely that the developer will take as long as possible.

According to the ESDC's 2009 MGPP, issued in June:
The build-out of the Project is likely to occur in two phases, with the Project elements on the Phase I Site and the Upgraded Yard (collectively, "Phase I") anticipated to be completed by 2014 and the Project elements on the Phase II Site (collectively, "Phase II") anticipated to be completed by 2019.

A public hearing notice issued in June just a few days after the MGPP announced a 25-year outside deadline for Phase 2 and, in an ESDC board memo distributed September 17, the interim leases for the arena block and Phase 2 were described as lasting up to 12 years and 25 years.

The ESDC says those are outside dates. In court in January, the ESDC argued that a separate Development Agreement requires Forest City Ratner to "use commercially reasonable efforts... to complete the entire Project by 2019."

Penalties and incentives

That Development Agreement wasn't released until nearly a week later. It poses penalties of less than $10 million for an arena that's up to three years late and $5 million for each of three buildings if they're late.

Otherwise, the ESDC asserted that a clause in the Development Agreement enforces a ten-year project buildout, with penalties of $10,000 a day.

However, non-monetary defaults are reduced to $1000 a day. That's why Forest City Ratner more cautiously asserted that damages would be up to $10,000 per day.

It remains in question whether these would be trumped by other clauses in the agreement, but the difference even between the two numbers is stark: $3.65 million (at $10,000/day) vs. $365,000 (at $1,000/day) over one year; $36.5 million vs. $3.65 million over ten years.

MGPP vs. Development Agreement

Keep in mind that, as I wrote 4/19/10, while the MGPP says each of the three buildings should start within six months of each other, the Development Agreement allows for two-year gaps.

The MGPP (above) included no timetable for the third tower, just "on or before a date certain."

(Click on graphics to enlarge)

However, the Development Agreement (excerpt right), however, says the third building doesn't have to start for ten years.

Remember, Atlantic Yards is supposed to have 16 towers.

If the third tower isn't commenced within ten years, it's impossible for the project to be finished in a decade.

Bottom line

The bottom line: the incentives for Forest City Ratner to use "commercially reasonable efforts... to complete the entire Project by 2019." seem very slight.

And no one official seems to care.

Ask Why.

Because it was a wired deal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.