Skip to main content

Radio show State of the Re:Union's lame take on Atlantic Yards: "Isn't any job better than none?"

Here are the money quotes from the public radio show State of the Re: Union and its Atlantic Yards segment, courtesy of host Al Letson. (The show will run on WNYC this weekend but is available online. You can comment here--though they didn't post my comment.)

Letson's not so much a journalist--his bio reads "Renaissance Man: Playwright/Performance Poet/Public Radio Host-Producer"--so analysis is less important than feeling. Indeed, the name Forest City Ratner is never mentioned in the segment, which lasts less than 13 minutes.

Letson said on the Brian Lehrer Show yesterday that he came in against eminent domain but emerged with a more nuanced sense of the controversy. Yes, he's sincere, but his takeaway is shallow:
But those who oppose Atlantic Yards will tell you that the jobs are a pipe dream, that the work created won't be sustainable middle-class building careers, and they may be right, but I wonder if it matters. In these tough times, when families are losing their homes and unemployment is through the roof, isn't any job better than none?
Isn't any job better than none? Well, no, because enormous public subsidies might be used to create more jobs and more housing.

Main characters

The three characters Letson tracks are former footprint resident and eminent domain plaintiff David Sheets; Prospect Heights neighbor (and, unmentioned, Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn activist) Jezra Kaye and family; and Brooklyn United for Innovative Local Development (BUILD) Chief Operating Officer Marie Louis.

Letson sums up, to a soundtrack of street noise and keyboards:
In the coming weeks, months, and years, David will occasionally wander through his own neighborhood to commune with the ghosts of what was. Jezra and Jerome will look out of their bedroom window, and spot where Atlantic Yards will be. They'll wrinkle their noses as they can almost smell the instant gentrification that 17 high-rises will bring. Marie Louis will drive down the same street in Prospect Heights that as a kid she would've avoided like the plague. She'll see the change she's helping to bring about and think to herself she's doing the right thing. Onlookers will walk by the initial construction of Atlantic Yards and not think twice of what used to be here, but what's happening now, or what it will look like in the future.
Hold on. There won't be 17 high-rises, or even the officially promised 16; there will be a long-lingering construction site and interim surface parking. There probably won't be instant gentrification because there won't be many towers; rather, there will be a basketball arena with its attendant crowds and cars.

And Marie Louis, who lives in the adjacent neighborhood of Crown Heights, not Prospect Heights, won't be driving down "the same street" because that street is almost surely Pacific Street, which will be demapped for superblocks, one for the arena and one to create space for parking, construction staging, and, in the distant future, privately owned but publicly accessible open space.

Opening up

The segment begins with Sheets detailing what it was like to live on Dean Street in the middle of construction activity; his "really nice garden" was dug up in order to take soil samples for the project. He was regularly awakened at 7 am by construction equipment 40 feet from his bed. (Unmentioned: He works the afternoon shift, so that makes a big difference.)

Then we get a quick intro to "the biggest development project in the history of Brooklyn" with quotes from Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz, New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg, and various TV/radio news announcers.

Letson narrates:
This Brooklyn neighborhood, Prospect Heights, is getting a facelift: a new basketball arena, 17 high-rises with condos, a shopping mall, office space. Well, this--this is the future of Brooklyn. But in order for that future to start, the past has to be swept away.
It's not exactly a facelift if the "lift" part isn't finished for 25 years. The office space is a pipe dream.

And it's not so much that the past must be swept away--though it will--but that an unelected state agency, the Empire State Development Corporation, with the city's consent, will override city zoning to install a project of unprecedented density, declaring the site blighted to acquire property by eminent domain.

Sheets goes on to describe life in the neighborhood--"like living in a small town"--and the uphill climb trying to fight eminent domain in court.

Letson's narration:
This is David's understanding of the situation: Rich men look down from their ivory towers at the same block he sees every day, but from their lofty purchase, they see something completely different: from so high up, people look like ants. They don't see a neighborhood, they see a place to build.
Interestingly enough, the "ants" perspective is exactly the one you get from the renderings of the arena and the towers, created as if from a helicopter.

An opponent

Letson asks Kaye, "Can I ask you, what does Atlantic Yards mean to you?"

"Theft," she responds. "Theft of property, theft of billions of dollars of public assets, and fraud."

That sounds like hyperbole, and it is, so it can be used to triangulate the Atlantic Yards debate as the center of clashing perspectives, rather than an analysis of what exactly happened.

"They're outraged by what they see at the city's underhanded attempts to help the developer, like when a neighborhood bridge was closed without notice," Letson narrates.

Actually, Kaye was talking about the the developer closing "a city street in the middle of the night," which I don't think happened without notice.

Questions of development

Kaye's husband Jerome Harris describes living through the "height of the crack period," and Kaye says, "The neighborhood did just fine in coming back from that challenge without any help from any government or any fancy developers. Nobody did anything about it except the people that lived here... and then as the neighborhood was coming back and getting more valuable, that's when they need to come back and say that we're blighted so that they can throw people out of their houses and take their land."

"People like Jezra, Jerome, and David Sheets think of community as something that grows organically from the bottom up," Letson observes. "But others have a different view. They remember the same bad times the neighborhood went through, but draw completely different conclusions."

Hold on. This is a little more complex. Community can grow organically, but if there's to be an enormous increase in density and changed land use--as with Atlantic Yards--such non-organic growth should be a public process. Atlantic Yards, with its dubious blight determination and unelected ESDC, is a bad example.

But Letson and the show treat it as a debate over gentrification.

Enter Louis

"I'm the first generation born of Haitian immigrants here," says Louis, saying she wanted to buy her home in a "community where I was born and raised."

Unmentioned is exactly the boundaries of "community," which is key to an understanding of the AY controversy and the notion of the Community Benefits Agreement (CBA) that BUILD and allied groups "negotiated" with the developer.

Louis's neighborhood is part of Community Board 8, which includes a segment of the AY site. But all three affected Community Boards either opposed the project as proposed or expressed serious questions.


Letson notes, "In my time in Prospect Heights, everyone I talked to opposed to Atlantic Yards was very skeptical of [BUILD] because its primary funder is the company developing Atlantic Yards."

He let that go without aiming for a neutral party, like those looking at CBAs from a national perspective, who say that's a bad idea for a developer to fund CBA partners. (And he let it go without calling Louis and BUILD on their deceptions.)

Letson explains that the CBA "is a contract signed by several community organizations to ensure that the project gives back to the community by doing things like funding workforce development."

"While the opponents say it's not binding, Marie disagrees," Letson narrates.

Hold on. Read the CBA. Forest City Ratner can get out of the obligation to BUILD by paying $500,000 for workforce training. It's not binding on FCR's successors.

Much more importantly, it's impossible to enforce the obligation to build subsidized "affordable" housing, because that depends on available subsidies, and the Development Agreement signed with the state allows for a smaller amount of such housing and delays if subsidies are unavailable.

Louis gives the standard mantra that "I don't know of any developer that's reached out" to the communities. Unmentioned is that Bloomberg now thinks of CBAs as "extortion."

Gentrification and job training

What's Louis's hope? She cites gentrification. "My hope is that as the community starts to thrive and do better economically, we want to, as much as we can, help people build up their economic wherewithal, so if you want to stay here, you can."

The concern about gentrification is legitimate, but not analyzed is whether this project--and this set of subsidies--is the right way to go about it. So there's no analysis of the affordable housing issue.

Rather, the segment goes to the issue of job training. Letson visits BUILD, where President James Caldwell "is addressing an overflowing room of people, mostly African-American men looking for work."

That leads to an interview with one of those men and Letson's money quote about whether any job might be better than none.

The coda

The show continues with mention of the groundbreaking, with the quote from Bloomberg that "nobody's going to remember how long it took, they're only going to look and see that it was done."

That's bogus, of course, given the persistence of construction and surface parking.

Letson asks Sheets what it's like to lose. "I don't think it's a matter of one side winning," Sheets response. "I think that we lost because our neighborhood is gone... I think that proponents of the project and the public at large are losers because I seriously question whether any of the benefits will ever actually come to be."

Well, with a project this big and the significant subsidies, the public at large may be losers--so says the New York City Independent Budget Office regarding the arena's impact on the city--but there surely would be a good number of people who consider themselves individual winners, with construction jobs and the first segment of subsidized housing.

(Actually, Russian oligarch Mikhail Prokhorov is a winner, leveraging his expected ownership of the Nets as entree to business in America. So are many Nets fans, who will see the team improve. Is that what eminent domain is about?)

Sheets says, "I've heard projections of when the remaining buildings within in the footprint will be demolished. I think that's when it's really going to be strange. There are a lot of ghosts, for me, wandering around out there."

And that leads to the final quote noted above. Too pat.


  1. We, the news consumer, would be better off without this sort of soft news about hard issues.

  2. Re this answer supplied above to the question of what Atlantic Yards means:
    "Theft," she responds. "Theft of property, theft of billions of dollars of public assets, and fraud."

    Yes, as AYR suggests that "sounds like hyperbole" and perhaps it can be used "to triangulate the Atlantic Yards debate as the center of clashing perspectives, rather than an analysis of what exactly happened."

    It "sounds like hyperbole," but is it? Or is "Theft. Theft of property, theft of billions of dollars of public assets, and fraud" really the best practical and most realistic description of what is going on if you are honestly trying to get your bearings with respect to what happened? What other few succinct words could be more accurate?

    Michael D. D. White
    Noticing New York

  3. It's a little scary that a nice guy like Al Letson who comes into Brooklyn with an anti-eminent domain stance was so easily persuaded by Marie Louis and Co. that benefits will actually be delivered, and that anything other than the arena will actually be built. The massive parking lot we all know is coming will blight this portion of Brooklyn for decades, and whatever eventually gets built... well, let's just say that Bloomberg's and Ratner's track records in this area suck.

  4. It seems as if the State of the Reunion segment wasn't a 15 minute hit piece on Ratner, you wouldn't of liked it. Why have we been conditioned to look for journalism in everything instead of the human element? This is a story with both sides. Initially I didn't think the segment was going to get to the other side but it did, and it put it out there in a way that creates conversation instead of hyperbole and incessant demonization.

  5. It didn't even mention Forest City Ratner by name.

  6. He-said/she-said journalism is not only sloppy and lazy, it “creates conversations” that are about the wrong things: “Is there or isn’t there global warming?” (That is not a useful conversation.)

    The moral is: No matter how “sincere,” don’t send a poet in to check a developer’s PR math. Mr. Letson should have at least found a few experts to talk to. I know he didn’t talk to me. Did he call you Norman? You know more about the project than even the developer does, certainly more than the state officials theoretically responsible.

    Michael D. D. White
    Noticing New York


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…