Skip to main content

How the ESDC quietly increased the amount of (lingering temporary) parking on Block 1129, and why that's an argument for more oversight

When the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) posted an updated version of the Amended Memorandum of Environmental Commitments (aka Memorandum of Mitigation Commitments), signed in December, the amount of parking on the southeast block of the site was apparently increased.

Block 1129, bounded by Carlton and Vanderbilt avenues and Dean and Pacific Streets, was as of 2006 supposed to hold a 944-space parking lot. Last June, when the project began re-approval, the parking lot grew to 1044 spaces. Only after the process was there any notice that the parking lot would hold 1100 spaces.

I tried to figure out why--and didn't get a full answer.

Incomplete disclosure of impacts

As described below, the ESDC's Technical Memorandum issued last June analyzed the impact of only the addition of 100 parking spaces, not 156 ones.

It concluded that, yes, there would still be an increased traffic delay--nearly a minute-and-a-half--at Dean Street and Sixth Avenue under peak demand, but, since a major delay had already been disclosed, there was nothing new.

And it concluded that there would be increased congestion at the corner of Dean Street and Carlton Avenue, but that could be mitigated by widening the crosswalk. However, the increase in parking was not analyzed, though presumably that might trigger additional widening of the crosswalk.

Surface parking and the need for oversight

Another 650 or so surface parking spaces would be made available on Block 1120, bounded by Sixth and Carlton avenues and Atlantic Avenue and Pacific Street, which contains both ground-level land and below-grade tracks.

BrooklynSpeaks pointed out in March that Atlantic Avenue was the borough's most dangerous road and that parking at the site should be reduced.

That hasn't happened, and Gib Veconi of the Prospect Heights Neighborhood Development Council (PHNDC) and BrooklynSpeaks suggested that the ongoing issue of traffic and parking demanded greater oversight:
Since its inception, the sponsors of the BrooklynSpeaks initiative have called attention to the traffic and transportation issues raised by the Atlantic Yards project. It is one of our key prinicples underlying an Atlantic Yards that works for Brooklyn. We have specifically attempted to engage the ESDC on the plan to allow nearly 1,700 “interim” surface parking spaces on the Phase II site prior to construction. Unfortunately, the agency’s May 2007 promises to have a substantive and ongoing discussion of this and other traffic issues affecting public safety and quality of life in a “transportation working group” have so far been unfulfilled. We hope that the recent attention on Atlantic Yards’ lack of public accountability will motivate the State to reform its stewardship of the largest development in Brooklyn’s history.
(His comment was not made in response to the issue of the extra 56 parking spaces, but it surely applies.)

Parking increase

From the November 2006 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), Chapter 12, Traffic and Parking:
p. 29: A total of approximately 750 permanent and 1,596 temporary parking spaces would also be provided in on-site parking garages and temporary parking lots

p. 48: Under Phase I of both the proposed project’s residential and commercial variations, a total of 750 parking spaces would be provided in two on-site public parking garages. Approximately 400 spaces would be provided in a parking garage on Site 5, with two below-grade levels and an entrance midblock on Pacific Street. Approximately 350 additional spaces would be provided in a second two-level public parking garage located on the arena block beneath Buildings 2 and 3. (No parking would be provided beneath the arena itself.) The entrance to this facility would be located on Dean Street approximately 100 feet west of 6th Avenue. Both of these parking garages would be attended-park facilities, and would employ car-stackers. A further 1,596 public parking spaces would be provided in Phase I in three temporary parking lots: an approximately 182-space below-grade parking lot at the southwest quadrant of Block 1120 with access expected to be from 6th Avenue; an approximately 470-space at-grade parking lot midblock on the north side of Block 1120 with access from Atlantic Avenue; and an approximately 944-space at-grade parking lot on Block 1129 with access expected to be from both Carlton and Vanderbilt Avenues.
(emphases added)

Parking increased to 1,044 spaces

The Technical Memorandum issued in June 2009:
p. 4: Due to the reconfiguration of below-grade space on the arena block, up to 100 spaces of parking that would have been provided under Building 2 of the arena block would be relocated to Block 1129. Initially, these parking spaces would be part of an interim parking facility on Block 1129. When Block 1129 is fully built out, this parking would be located in a below-grade facility.
The Response to Comments document provided to ESDC board members before their September 17 vote summed it up:
As discussed in the Technical Memorandum, under the MGPP, up to 100 of the 350 parking spaces planned for the Arena block would instead be accommodated on Block 1129. This would bring the number of parking spaces on Block 1129 to approximately 1,044 at the end of Phase I....The MGPP relocates 100 parking spaces from the Arena block to Block 1129, increasing the size of the parking lot on Block 1129 to 1,044 spaces.
Parking increased to 1,100 spaces

However, the December 2009 Memorandum of Environmental Commitments states:
No more than 1100 vehicles, in the aggregate, shall be parked in any surface parking lot(s) on Block 1129 at any one time.
And, as explained today, in March, the ESDC signed an Arena Parking Declaration that describes plans for parking on Block 1129, with "not less than 1,100 motorized passenger vehicles."

Questions posed

I asked the ESDC:
  • have 56 spaces been added and thus the size of the lot increased?
  • if so, is that for all uses of the parking lot (pre- and post-arena opening) or just for construction workers?
  • was the 1100 number described or revealed in any other document besides the Memorandum of Environmental Commitments?
ESDC response

ESDC spokeswoman Elizabeth Mitchell responded:
ESDC's Response to Comments (Sept. 2009) indicates on pages 27-28 that at the conclusion of Phase I, there will be approximately 2,346 parking spaces on the project site, comprised of approximately 1,044 spaces on Block 1129 and approximately 1,302 spaces in other parking lots on the project site. These plans have not changed.

In the Project completion condition (Phase I + Phase II), there will be 2,070 parking spaces on Block 1129 (see Technical Memorandum at page 26). During this condition, all of the parking spaces will be in below ground parking lots that are to be constructed on Block 1129. Again, these plans have not changed.
A "more general restriction"

Mitchell continued:
The Amended Memorandum of Environmental Commitments (December 21, 2009) indicates on page 15 that ESDC has imposed a more general restriction on surface parking on Block 1129. ESDC imposed this restriction to address community concerns about the size of the interim surface parking lot at this location. In the Amended Memorandum of Environmental Commitments, which has been incorporated into the Master Closing documents with FCRC affiliates, ESDC prohibits parking more than 1100 vehicles on the surface of Block 1129 at any time. This prohibition applies throughout the construction of the project and thus during each interim phase of project completion and construction.

As noted above, the number 1,044 spaces on Block 1129 represents a snap shot in time (the Phase I completion condition). There is no discrepancy between a document stating that there will be approximately 1,044 spaces on Block 1129 in the Phase I completion condition and a different document stating that throughout the multi-year construction period (Phase I + Phase II) ESDC will not permit more than 1,100 surface parking spaces on Block 1129 at any time.
A lingering temporary condition

So, while the cap of 1100 spaces is a temporary condition, that temporary condition could linger for more than a decade.

Those additional 56 spaces could be removed only when Phase 1 is considered completed, which could be a dozen years without penalty (or even longer, if extensions are granted).

Under a lawyerly interpretation, there may be no discrepancy, given that no interim maximum was set. However, it was certainly plausible to have seen 944 spaces, and then 1,044 spaces, as the cap.

Note that I didn't get an answer to this question: was the 1100 number described or revealed in any other document besides the Memorandum referenced above?

Community concerns

The ESDC's cap of 1100 spaces seems like a response to "community concerns" expressed by PHNDC in its comments on the Modified General Project Plan:
The remaining 1,736 [arena parking] spaces must be located on block 1129. They would presumably be used for arena parking, as the distance between block 1129 and the arena block would seem to make block 1129 unattractive as a location for an accessory lot for residential or commercial buildings.
The MGPP contains no commitment to limit the amount of interim parking for the arena to the 1,100 spaces allocated to the arena at the end of Phase II. The amount of parking for arena patrons after Phase I therefore represents an increase of 62% over the amount disclosed at full build.
That actually was a misreading, since the parking on Block 1120 was omitted. But it apparently allowed the ESDC to then set 1100 spaces as a cap for surface parking, rather than 1044 spaces. The figure of 1100 spaces on Block 1129 at the end of Phase 2 represents underground parking.

The impact on traffic: worse but not new?

The Technical Memorandum analyzed the addition of 100 parking spaces, not 156 ones, and concluded that no new adverse impacts would be caused--how could they be sure if the full number wasn't analyzed?--but that one known adverse impact would get worse:
Overall, however, the proposed relocation of 100 parking spaces from the arena block to Block 1129 would not result in any new significant adverse traffic impacts at any of the seven analyzed intersections in any peak hour... One location of note is the intersection of 6th Avenue and Dean Street where the FEIS revealed a significant adverse impact to the eastbound Dean Street approach in the Saturday pre-game peak hour; this impact would remain unmitigated under the proposed project’s traffic mitigation plan outlined in the FEIS. As shown in Table 8b, in the 2016 Build with Mitigation condition, the eastbound approach would operate at LOS [Level of Service] E with 77.6 seconds of delay compared to LOS B with 16.3 seconds of delay in the 2016 No Build. The relocation of on-site parking capacity... would worsen to LOS F and 82.2 seconds of delay..
The impact on pedestrians: worse but not new?

The Technical Memorandum, again analyzing the addition of only 100 parking spaces, concluded that the impact on pedestrians at the north crosswalk on Carlton Avenue at Dean Street could be mitigated:
The FEIS proposed widening the north crosswalk on Carlton Avenue by four feet (from 16 to 20 feet in width) and the north crosswalk on 6th Avenue by one foot (from 16 to 17 feet in width) to return both of these crosswalks from LOS E to LOS D conditions, thereby fully mitigating these impacts.
... To accommodate this additional demand [from the relocation of up to 100 spaces of parking], the design development includes the widening of the north crosswalk on Carlton Avenue at Dean Street and the north crosswalk on 6th Avenue at Dean Street by an additional one-foot each.... would maintain each of these crosswalks at an acceptable LOS D, with more than 15 square feet/pedestrian in each peak hour.
Does that mean that, with addition of even more parking, they need to widen the crosswalks again?

Is widening the crosswalk meaningful when the sidewalk itself can't be enlarged?

The Technical Memorandum says that traffic along the north side sidewalk of Dean Street between Vanderbilt and Sixth avenues would be in fine shape no matter what. That will be interesting to see.

Arena Parking Declaration

Amended Memorandum of Environmental Commitments for The


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…