Skip to main content

ESDC/FCR say eviction delay past May 17 would "cripple" Atlantic Yards, but claims of continued losses and jeopardized benefits seem overblown

On the eve of a crucial court hearing regarding the fate of condemnees still in the Atlantic Yards footprint, the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) and Forest City Ratner (FCR) are arguing that the failure to evict those occupants by May 17 would cause "enormous harm" and significant financial losses to the developer.

It is unclear how many of the six households (15 people) and three businesses yet to reach agreements with the developer will resist the condemnation, but a response to those legal arguments--likely stating that this is unusually swift for a condemnation cast--will be filed tomorrow, before a 9:30 10 a.m. hearing before state Supreme Court Justice Abraham Gerges at Supreme Court in Brooklyn, 320 Jay Street.

According to my preliminary analysis, several ESDC/FCR claims overstate the damage anticipated, emphasize the costs without acknowledging significant subsidies, and fail to provide sufficient detail to establish the argument for speed.

(Also see my coverage of FCR's claims regarding Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn's legal strategy and alternative condos offered project opponent Daniel Goldstein. Note that, beyond those totaled above, some other businesses and residents remain in the footprint, but have reached agreements to leave. Crain's totals 32 residents and three businesses.)

ESDC affidavit

ESDC attorney Charles Webb summarizes the argument made in an affidavit from the developer:
Delay in achieving vacant possession would halt work on the Project, causing enormous harm by (i) prolonging the time in which FCRC must carry the real property and the Project's overhead without generating income, which costs FCRC $6,700,000 per month, (b) prolonging the Nets basketball team's operating losses of approximately $35 million a per year arising from its New Jersey location, and (c) jeopardizing the delivery of 2,250 affordable housing units, and significant public amenities, including a new transit entrance and eight acres of publicly accessible open space.
$6.7 million in losses?

The $6.7 million figure doesn't add up. An affidavit in the package from FCR executive Maryanne Gilmartin explains that, among other things, it costs the developer $2.9 million per month to carry the property and $2.5 million per month to defray the Brooklyn Arena Local Development Corporation's liability to bondholders for interest on the bonds.

That $2.5 million cost will continue until vacant possession is achieved, and bond proceeds can be released. The bond sale would be rescinded if vacant possession is not achieved by 12/17/10, which is unlikely.

Subtract that new $2.5 million cost from $6.7 million and the total is $4.2 million. However, in an affidavit filed 1/17/08 in a separate AY case--long before bonds were issued, adding that new cost of $2.5 million--Gilmartin swore that the monthly carrying cost was already $6 million.

(Forest City Ratner lawyer Jeffrey Braun, unaccountably doubled down and claimed the tab was $12 million a month. Gilmartin's new affidavit draws significantly on standard language in that affidavit from 2008.)

Losses in New Jersey

The affidavits make no mention of the Nets' move from the antiquated Izod Center to the Prudential Center in Newark for at least the next two seasons.

While that location would not be as profitable as the expected Barclays Center, where the developer would gain the benefit from naming rights and other sponsorships, there's no reason to think that the team's losses would approach $35 million.

Affordable housing

The affordable housing would be slowed by a delay in arena construction only in the most general way.

The affordable housing units depend most crucially on sufficient subsidies, which is why the ESDC allows the developer to assert an Affordable Housing Subsidy Unavailability, part of a timeline that allows 25 years to build the project rather than the ten years officially announced.

Open space

As for the eight acres of open space, they're not due until Phase 2 of the project. Forest City Ratner has 12 years--plus extensions--to build Phase 1. And the eight acres wouldn't arrive until the project was completed--perhaps 25 years.

FCR investment: $280 million?

Gilmartin stated:
A failure to promptly issue the Writs of Assistance would cripple the Project, would be injurious to the public interest, and would wrongfully expose the Project's sponsors to enormous financial harm.
Forest City, according to Gilmartin, "has invested about $280 million in acquiring properties from willing sellers and carrying those properties."

Unmentioned: New York City taxpayers have contributed $131 million, nearly half that figure, to subsidize FCR's investment.

Bond fees

Regarding the $511 million in tax-exempt bonds issued to help build the arena, Gilmartin states:
The professional fees an other costs that were incurred for this tax-exempt financing by FCRC (which is responsible for the fees and costs of all of the participants in the transaction) are enormous.
Consider the savings Forest City Ratner gains via the tax-exempt bonds, which surely dwarf the "enormous" fees.

The New York City Independent Budget Office (IBO), in a September 2009 report that presumed $678 million in tax-exempt arena bonds, estimated that the federal tax break was worth $194 million. A commensurate percentage would make the federal tax break on $511 million worth $146.2 million.

One interruption

Gilmartin writes:
Furthermore, construction activities commenced at the Project site in 2007 and have continued with only one interruption since then.
To an unwitting reader, that "interruption" sounds like it might be a brief hiatus, a weekend or two. Actually, Forest City Ratner stopped railyard work in early December 2008 and didn't start back until the fall of 2009.

Need for demolition

Gilmartin's affidavit points to specific buildings in the developer's path, presumably occupied by the few people yet to reach agreements.

One is Goldstein's condo:
Furthermore, so long as the former Goldstein unit remains occupied, it is necessary to keep Pacific Street open to traffic to allow access to and egress from the building. Pacific Street occupies a large portion of real estate that is essential to construction of the arena because it runs through the middle of the arena site. Therefore, the inability to close Pacific Street and excavate the street for the arena, due to continuing occupancy of the former Goldstein unit, substantially impedes further progress on construction of the arena.
Another involves Henry Weinstein's building at 752 Pacific Street on the southeast block, Block 1129. Block 1129 will be used for construction-related activities, storage of machinery and materials, and parking for construction workers.

The package of legal papers lists two businesses, Freddy's Bar & Backroom and Pack It Away Storage, as not having come to agreements with the developer. Since then, Freddy's has reached a settlement.

Weinstein, however, is said not to have possession of his building and associated parking lots; he has since retaken possession, though the issue is in dispute.

Construction sequence

Gilmartin states that delays threaten an October 2012 arena opening, though a specific construction schedule is not included in the package of papers:
All of the various construction-related activities described in this affidavit are part of a carefully developed and very intricate sequence of work that is now intended to allow the Barclays Center arena to open in time to permit the Nets to play home games at the Barclays Center by the beginning of the 2012-13 NBA season Furthermore, it takes at least three to four months to commission an arena like Barclays Center--i.e., to test and refine the various buildings systems and the various operations (such as security and food services) that must be performing properly and efficiently before the arena can be opened for the professional basketball season. In other words, it is essential that the arena be completed by early July 2012, so that the commission process can be completed by the opening of the basketball season in October 2012. To achieve that goal, it is essential to now vacate the buildings required for phase 1 of the Project, because the critical path to completion of the arena on schedule requires prompt realization of vacant possession of those properties.
Order to Show Cause ESDC, Atlantic Yards Condemnation Case

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.