Skip to main content

Paterson meets with Atlantic Yards opponents, promises "objective and fair hearing" (but what does that mean now?)

So, as the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) moves forward with Atlantic Yards, can the man in charge of the agency, Governor David Paterson--once a public opponent of eminent domain (as DDDB's Daniel Goldstein reminds us), now a tacit supporter of Atlantic Yards--do anything?

Well, at least he's listening. Last night, before a "community conversation" at the First A.M.E. Zion Church in Bedford-Stuyvesant, organized by local elected officials. Paterson held a hastily-called meeting with a small group of Atlantic Yards opponents.

(Photos by Tracy Collins; set)

He promised them "an objective and fair hearing"--seemingly meaningless (and too late) boilerplate given that state agencies like the ESDC and Metropolitan Transportation Authority have already been charged to do so and have vigorously defended their actions in court after being sued.

Also, with a bond sale in the works, surely others in the administration would tell Paterson that the horse is about to leave the barn and stopping the project would lead to a huge legal mess. Then again, there's a serious argument--as per Nicole Gelinas--that the bond sale is risky, thus giving Paterson some cover, should he invoke his maverick streak.

(What could he do? Tell the ESDC not to pursue eminent domain? Stall the bond sale?)

The meeting

Paterson's staff organized the meeting with less than a day's notice, in response to communications from Council Member Letitia James. Later, in the segment of the meeting acknowledging local elected officials, Paterson dubbed James "the ghost of Atlantic Yards."

In her brief public remarks, James eschewed direct mention of AY but said, "We need development which is in the best interests of the city and state and which will not increase our debt."

The AY question

The Atlantic Yards question came not from one of the several AY activists in the crowd--well outnumbered by hundreds of neighborhood folk--but from Mary Alice Miller, a writer for Our Time Press and a Room 8 blogger.

"Would you tell us how you feel about giving 1.5 billion dollars in tax-free bonds in order to build Atlantic Yards, build a stadium that would create part-time jobs, and there's no promise that affordable housing would be built?" Miller asked.

Actually, there would be only $500 million in tax-free bonds; the state says there would be 4538 new jobs, but that depends significantly on the building of an office tower.

Other full-time jobs, in retail and building services, depend on the construction of housing towers and, under one scenario acknowledged by the ESDC, only one may be built in the near term.

(Video by Tracy Collins)

Paterson's response

Paterson responded, "In the case of Atlantic Yards, a committee of advocates who are opposed to the Atlantic Yards decision met with me right here in this church prior to this meeting. And I have promised them an objective and fair hearing on the issue."

He seemed to be focusing on the decision last week by the Court of Appeals in the Atlantic Yards eminent domain case rather than the project as a whole. He thus bypassed Miller's specific questions about bonds, housing, and jobs.

"We cannot reverse the Court of Appeals decision," Paterson said. "But whether the state has an interest in Atlantic Yards is something that to this point we have, but, upon advisement from Council Member James, we will review it."

Whether the state has an interest in Atlantic Yards is something that to this point we have? The state has invested $100 million and is backing it to the hilt.

As the video shows, Paterson's statement drew some healthy applause, but only a relative fraction of the audience applauded. (No one, as far as I could tell, booed or otherwise expressed disagreement, however.) The crowd was far more enthusiastic about issues closer to home.

What might happen

"He said he'd have independent, disinterested individuals take another look," James said afterward. "I await the review, because individuals on his staff have privately indicated that this project is not in the best interests of the state."

However, James acknowledged, Paterson has indicated to staffers that "he can't rescind the state's commitment."

Which doesn't leave him much room.

More on the event

While Paterson's been battered in the polls, it was a friendly audience, where speakers invoked Comptroller Bill Thompson's better-than-the-polls mayoral race to support Paterson's bid for a full term as governor. "Run, David, Run," the crowd chanted at one point.

Speaking without notes (obviously; he described himself as "I'm black, I'm blind, and I'm still alive"), Paterson took a place not at the podium but at the pew level of the church, allowing for a more intimate exchange. He asserted that New York has been far more fiscally responsible than other states, which are cutting vital services.

He even vetoed a bill he had proposed as a legislator, deeming the cost of a bill on lead paint removal too high, but later established a task force to address the issues.

And when James, in greeting the audience, said Paterson should not enact cuts in social services but instead tax the rich, he responded, "we are doing that right now."

He took some tough questions, including ones about teacher tenure, AIDS, and affordable housing. But, as NY1 reported, it was a comfortable setting for the governor who never sought the job.


  1. It's clear to me (I wasn't there) that Paterson made his comments as a favor to James and as a way to defuse the issue at the meeting. I doubt that he even knows where the project is located.

  2. There is plenty the Governor can do to stop the project. It is just a matter of if he has the political guts to do it.

    My surmise is that it would help him with the only political figures that really matter in the end -- the voters.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…