Skip to main content

Schumer touts stimulus funds for Moynihan Station, waves off question on Atlantic Yards

For New York, the big stimulus news of the day yesterday was Senator Chuck Schumer's plan to seek $100 million in federal funds to jump-start the Moynihan Station project, as the New York Times reported.

And Schumer followed up on his Moynihan Station vision at a breakfast speech sponsored by Crain's New York Business. That got a headline in Crain's, which additionally reported that Schumer's call for new, smarter regulation on financial transactions represents an about-face from his position two years ago.

But I wanted to ask him about Atlantic Yards, given that, a little more than two weeks ago, Schumer expressed quizzical ignorance regarding whether AY would be eligible for stimulus funds.

Waiting for Schumer

After Schumer's speech, and the 25-minute Q&A, the Senator stuck around the stage at the Hilton in midtown and greeted well-wishers and supplicants, among them the developers of the New Domino project in Williamsburg, who wanted him to know they needed help on the affordable housing component. (If Forest City Ratner wants to talk to Schumer, they can pick up the phone, right?)

He also took a few questions from reporters, answering in some detail.

When I finally got to him, he was less expansive. I told him I wrote a blog about Atlantic Yards and prefaced my question by stating that "Marty wants to use federal stimulus money for the railyards."

"Marty who?" asked Schumer, his mind apparently not on parochial borough politics.

"Marty Markowitz," I replied.

"I don't know," Schumer said dismissively, the statement responding (I think) to the propriety of the question rather than the policy issue. "I'm not--"

An aide interjected, saying it was time to go. And that was it.

What to make of it?

I don't think that means Schumer necessarily opposes stimulus funds for Atlantic Yards, but he clearly hasn't made it a priority. And it's not clear that the project would be shovel-ready, at least under the "transparent, immediate, and effective" dictum proposed by Governor David Paterson.

So, until other priorities like Moynihan Station fall by the wayside, there's no reason to go to bat for Atlantic Yards.

Still, it's notable that Atlantic Yards does not really compare to Moynihan Station, about which he declared, "Because it's just exactly what the stimulus ordered, which is important, long-lasting transportation projects that can be shovel-ready."

"In other words, there's a tension; the ones that are most shovel ready are sort of superficial: repaving a road," he explained. "And the ones that are deep don't often meet the criteria of being shovel-ready in 180 days. Parts of Moynihan Station meet both.'

Contrast with Queens West

"We've got to continue to develop more affordable housing and let neighborhoods evolve... We don't want neighborhoods to lose their character, but we don't want to be stuck in the past."

"Queens West is a great idea," he said. "More middle-class housing so that, as more young people get married and have families, they can stay here."

Note that Queens West, once announced as a project with some 5000 apartments affordable to to middle-income households, was last heard as having 40% market-rate units. That would all be on public land, with advocates calling for an open bid process.

While Queens West is controversial, it's a lot less controversial than Atlantic Yards, which is probably one reason why Schumer didn't mention it.

Also, while Queens West would not include low-income housing (900 such units were announced for Atlantic Yards, though hardly guaranteed), it would be 60% affordable, while AY would be 35% affordable, as announced (2250/6430 units)

Changing role of the private sector

Regarding Moynihan Station, the vision has changed from developers with office tower plans driving the project to a process led by government. "You can't wait for the private sector on this; you just can't," Schumer said yesterday. "It's not that they wouldn't do a good job--they wouldn't get the financing."

Crain's noted that, while Schumer said the developers should be pushed to “move as quickly as possible on the private development portion of the project,” he didn't detail how that could be done.

WNYC reported: But the president of the joint venture, Vishaan Chakrabarti, says the developers now want a smaller role, to act more or less as general contractors that public agencies would hire to renovate the Farley building.

In other words, it no longer seems wise for public agencies to expect private developers, as with Atlantic Yards, to produce public infrastructure as the byproduct of their projects. After all, as developer Forest City Enterprises has declared re AY, "We control the pace."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.