Skip to main content

Brutally weird: Brooklyn Paper sold to Murdoch; now an independent online Brooklyn publication is needed

Given the pressures on the news industry, it's not surprising that Brooklyn Paper publisher Ed Weintrob might have put his weekly newspaper chain on the block, and it's not shocking that Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation, which already controls the Courier-Life chain, might have decided to make the purchase as the New York Observer reported yesterday.

(Graphic by Lumi Rolley of NoLandGrab.)

What is surprising--brutally weird, actually--is that Brooklyn Paper editor Gersh Kuntzman, a New York Post alumnus would tell the Observer, "They don’t want the product to change. And they love the product. And the product is fantastic."

Well, um, why wouldn't the News Corporation seek, as they say in the biz, efficiencies and synergies in Brooklyn news coverage and ad sales, given that both papers publish editions for neighborhoods like Park Slope, Brooklyn Heights, and Fort Greene? (There are areas with less overlap.) DDDB calls it Monopolyn.

For how long will two reporters compete to cover the same story for two competing newspapers owned by the same giant corporation? Brooklyn Optimist blogger Morgan Pehme already reports that consolidation has begun, with some staffers and the Greenpoint Courier getting the ax.

The Courier-Life chain recently moved from Sheepshead Bay to rent space in Forest City Ratner's MetroTech. Will the Brooklyn Paper, now headquartered in DUMBO, be consolidated into the same space? If so, it might make it tougher to report critically on Brooklyn's most powerful developer.

In the New York Times's new Fort Greene/Clinton Hill blog The Local, Andy Newman commented that "we were happy" to learn that the Paper, threatened with demise, was being purchased:
Now Mr. Kuntzman, a former New York Post reporter, will be back working for his old boss, which may or may not be a great thing but definitely beats unemployment.

Maybe the "voice that's Brooklyn to the core" (in Newman's words) will be preserved, but I have some doubts.

(Update: Politico's Michael Calderone points out that the deal helps Murdoch's properties compete with the New York Daily News, traditionally strong in Brooklyn and Queens.)

Establishment vs. outlier

The Courier-Life, as noted below, has always been the establishment chain, its publisher contributing to political candidates and chairing the Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce. The Courier-Life publishes Borough President Marty Markowitz's Brooklyn!! promotional publication. (Click on graphic to enlarge.)

The Brooklyn Paper has always been more of an outlier. In fact, Kuntzman told Gothamist a little more than a year ago, on 2/11/08, "Brooklyn needs us too much right now, what with local papers being snapped up by billionaire moguls who have no interest in local news except maximizing classified ad sales. Has Rupert Murdoch even BEEN to Brooklyn? His reporters don't know the territory, either."

Oh.

Who'll fill the gap? Online newspaper needed

The untimely loss of Gowanus Lounge founder Robert Guskind weighs heavily; not only would Guskind have offered some acid commentary on the consolidation, he would have been in the forefront of efforts to maintain independent reporting on the borough.

Will the Brooklyn Eagle, which focuses on downtown, step up? Will the Brooklyn Downtown Star, part of the Queens Ledger chairn/ I doubt it. Both Pehme and OTBKB's Louise Crawford think local blogs will become more important.

Brownstoner currently has a significant readership, more than the web sites of the major Brooklyn weeklies, and generates many comments, but essentially aggregates others' reporting, along with other information (press releases, etc.). Perhaps when the market recovers, Brownstoner will be able to restore the second staffer lost.

I don't doubt that blogs will become more important, but online journalism ideally should be an institution--say, a New Haven Independent, an online newspaper run by Paul Bass (a friend)--that can aggregate readers, distribute news tips, and maintain quality.

Brooklyn needs such a publication, a Voice of San Diego or a MinnPost, a nonprofit organization dedicated to reporting.

What about Atlantic Yards?

Consider a 12/30/06 Brooklyn Paper editorial headlined Covering Atlantic Yards:
Over the last 12 months, no story has been as important to Brooklyn — and, as a result, to this newspaper — as Bruce Ratner’s Atlantic Yards mega-development.

With its 16-towers, 19,000-seat basketball arena, 6,000 units of housing and hundreds of thousands of square feet of office and retail space, Ratner’s mini-city is the biggest single-developer project in the history of Brooklyn.

As such, it deserved — and got — our attention, sometimes obsessively so. As we prepared our year-in-review issue, we noticed that not a single issue this year was devoid of coverage of some element of the Ratner proposal.

Yet our laser-like focus has earned us little praise and sometimes even outright scorn from local elected officials. In an interview in this week’s Papers, the project’s biggest booster, Borough President Markowitz, calls us “biased” because our coverage revealed the shocking density of the project, the traffic it would cause, and the subsidy-enriched sweetheart deal Gov. Pataki’s cronies cooked up in Albany to make this project work for Ratner.

Given how we’ve been attacked for such coverage — and the overwhelming support the project enjoys among city and state powerbrokers — many of our readers have wondered why we even bothered. Indeed, it would have been far easier for us to blow off Atlantic Yards, as did the daily papers, and our weekly competitor, the New York Post-owned, Sheepshead Bay-based, Courier-Life chain.

(Emphasis added)

Let's assume that the Brooklyn Paper will be less likely to slam the Courier-Life chain, which, it should be pointed out, editorially supported Atlantic Yards before it was bought by Murdoch.

Will the Brooklyn Paper point out again that a Courier-Life reporter--the one who recently cast Bruce Ratner as a victim of project opponents bent on denying him stimulus funds--gave Ratner a bear hug?

Will the Brooklyn Paper again target Courier-Life publisher Dan Holt (and former Chamber of Commerce chair, still an ex officio board member), as it did 8/5/06 in the pre-Murdoch era for contributing to political candidates? (See graphic above; click to enlarge.) Probably not, though Holt remained at the paper and, as the graphic below indicates, has made another dozen contributions to candidates since then.

[Update March 25: Dan Holt is no longer listed as the Courier-Life publisher; that job goes to Clifford Luster, part of the family of longtime owners, who's listed in the print issue but not the web site. I'm not sure when Holt left, but he and Luster were co-publishers when the chain was sold in September 2006.]

Will the Brooklyn Paper maintain its tough coverage of Atlantic Yards? Well, it's already receded somewhat. Has the Brooklyn Paper covered Delia Hunley-Adossa's AY-related challenge to Letitia James? Not yet.

Is that because the newspaper is less aggressive or just shorthanded?

Was Weintrob's shocker of an editorial last month calling for a federal bailout of the AY arena related to an effort to sell the paper, to make it's AY position more palatable? I still doubt it, but there's a whiff of a question.

Murdoch believes

Kuntzman, who's no longer trashing "billionaire moguls," commented on the Observer:
Brooklyn still needs The Brooklyn Paper, which is why one of the only people in the world who still believes in newspapers — Rupert Murdoch — is putting his money and genius behind us.

Genius?

To be fair, Murdoch didn't dumb down the Wall Street Journal after he bought it. He did refocus the front page, and some even see improvement in the breadth of coverage. But the Journal is an elite paper, not a free one.

I suspect the Brooklyn Paper will continue to do some good work, but will it go after politicians and other powers-that-be in the same way? Some convergence with the Courier-Life seems inevitable.

Comments

  1. Thank god this happened. Now there is no longer a pretense of coverage, let alone quality coverage of Brooklyn.

    I am reminded of the following quote:

    'There is only one way to hurt someone who has lost everything, give him back something broken.' -Thomas Covenant

    Brooklyn lost the Dodgers and got the lowest level minor league in return.

    Now it is being promised something that is a fading image (Nets).

    Brooklyn lost its paper(Eagle) and got the courier/brooklyn papers contraption.

    Neither one of them spoke to any real issues or did right by Brooklyn.

    Maybe Brooklyn has paid its dues and will create its own answer. I'm tired of waiting for others.

    Its time Brooklyn got a grip and refused mediocrity.

    Thank you Rupert. You may have forced our hand.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Norman.

    Nice piece. You ask a lot of questions in it. Pity you didn't call to seek the answers.

    GERSH KUNTZMAN
    Editor
    The Brooklyn Paper

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kuntzman is kidding himself if he thinks that "They don’t want the product to change. And they love the product. And the product is fantastic."
    Less than a year after Murdoch bought the Wall Street Journal Marcus Brauchli (editor and long time employee) was out. That's the way he operates.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Gersh, I started writing this at about 11:30 last night. I chose not to wake you up.

    You're welcome to post additional comments, and I'm happy to link to future coverage.

    Please let us know if you are going to call out Dan Holt on his political contributions?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Maybe if Brooklyn could revoke the "Mistake of '98," and cut itself off from its Nanny State Manhattan, we can stop being the punching bag of the city. We can get a real newspaper, a real baseball team, a real transportation system, or whatever else a real city might decide to acquire. Heck, if they want to charge us to cross our own Bridge, then maybe Brooklyn will be the one collecting the toll. Then we could kick Ratner and his Tammany friends the hell outta here.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The Brooklyn Eagle www.brooklyneagle.com/
    seems to have expanded its coverage. I've read a lot about Gowanus, Bay Ridge, Sunset Park over the past year.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.