Skip to main content

What happened to the footprint trees? Parks Department says replacements due only after construction

Some 86 trees have been disappearing around the Atlantic Yards footprint over the past several months as preconstruction demolition and utility work has continued, prompting some community alarm, given that the tree removal was apparently not formally announced and, apparently unanticipated in the environmental review, there are still people living and working in the Atlantic Yards footprint.

Jim Vogel, an officer in the Council of Brooklyn Neighborhoods, said members of his East Pacific Street Block Association are concerned about 13 mature trees on the south side of Pacific Street between Fourth and Flatbush avenues, across from the planned development at Site 5. Pacific Street must be widened for what the Brooklyn Paper has called "the Fourth-to-Flatbush two-step," and Vogel says he's worried that the south side will be vulnerable. (Actually, Chapter 24, Response to Comments, of the Atlantic Yards Final Enviornmental Impact Statement, says the proposed widening of the street would not affect the south sidewalk or its trees.)

Still, the dismay is such that City Council Member Letitia James said yesterday that there should be "a moratorium on the removal of any more trees, in and around the foot print." Vogel suggested that the tree removals are a "p.r. stunt for the groundbreaking," pointing out that the announced project groundbreaking in November can only be symbolic.

"If the project goes through, take the trees down as you need them," he said, suggesting that the tree removals reinforce claims of blight.

(Photo of block bounded by Dean and Pacific streets and Flatbush and Sixth avenues, via Google Maps. Photo of tree stump on Flatbush Avenue near Fifth Avenue by Steve Soblick for No Land Grab.)

Info is hard to get

Tree removal has not been mentioned in the Construction Updates issued by the Empire State Development Corporation. In fact, when I queried the ESDC and was told to contact developer Forest City Ratner, which did not respond to an e-mail query. (Shouldn't this information have been at the fingertips of the ESDC Ombudsman and also the Atlantic Yards Community Liaison Office?)

Parks Department explanation

Then I contacted the New York City Parks Department; spokesman Phil Abramson told me, "A removal permit for 86 trees was issued in March 2008. There was no way to keep the trees in place and build what they want to build there, and transplanting them would have been risky as far as survival.

I asked for a copy of the permit; I was told to submit a Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request. (Vogel has been distributing information on how to file such FOIL requests; I imagine that the Parks Department will receive numerous requests for the permit.)

[Photo from The Footprint Gazette, which has photos and videos from April tree removal.]

Restitution

"Restitution was set at either 328 replacement trees or $246,180," Abramson said. "They agreed to plant 116 trees and pay the remaining $159,000 in restitution. They are also planting an additional 546 trees within the complex itself, which we did not count as restitution."

Restitution, he explained, is not 1 for 1 but rather is based on the trees' size and condition. "The factor is determined by taking the diameter of the tree to be removed at 4.5 feet (dbh [Diameter at Breast Height] standard) and determining how many 3" caliper trees would fit inside that area, then multiplying by a condition rating."

Where and when?

The 116 trees, he said, would be planted "along the streets surrounding the new construction" within the city's right of way.

And when will they arrive? They'll be planted at the "end of construction," because they'd be damaged during construction, Abramson said.

But what does "end of construction" mean in the context of a project that could take dozens of years, in two official (but perhaps more) phases?

"At the end of each phase," Abramson responded. "So the trees around the arena would be planted when the arena was done, and so on."

However, if construction of the towers around the arena is ongoing, then the trees--at least trees in a specific zone--might have to wait until each tower is completed. Perhaps that question is answered in the yet-unseen permit.

As for the trees on private property, he said, "we would assume would also be [planted] after major construction had ended." (Indeed, graphics in the Draft Design Guidelines suggest that landscaping would be included as each building is completed.)

Comments

  1. Here's a clue: http://thefootprintgazette.blogspot.com/2008/09/heres-what-happened-to-footprint-trees.html

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

So, Forest City has some property subject to the future Gowanus rezoning

Writing yesterday, MAP: Who Owns All the Property Along the Gowanus Canal, DNAinfo's Leslie Albrecht lays out the positioning of various real estate players along the Gowanus Canal, a Superfund site:
As the city considers whether to rezone Gowanus and, perhaps, morph the gritty low-rise industrial area into a hot new neighborhood of residential towers (albeit at a fraction of the height of Manhattan's supertall buildings), DNAinfo reviewed property records along the canal to find out who stands to benefit most from the changes.
Investors have poured at least $440 million into buying land on the polluted waterway and more than a third of the properties have changed hands in the past decade, according to an examination of records for the nearly 130 properties along the 1.8-mile canal. While the single largest landowner is developer Property Markets Group, other landowners include Kushner Companies, Alloy Development, Two Trees, and Forest City New York.

Forest City's plans unc…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…