Skip to main content

Would JJ like AY? An exhaustive "no"

Would Jane Jacobs approve of Atlantic Yards? I've written before about how the planners behind the project certainly were not unmindful of the Jacobsian qualities for a healthy city, but the project really wouldn't qualify. And I also wrote about the AY angle regarding the Jane Jacobs exhibit.

Now urban planner and lawyer Michael D.D. White ups the ante, with an essay and chart in the Brooklyn Paper concluding that AY would be very, very not Jacobsian.


  1. Here are all 47 Criteria that were used to examine the project:

    47 Criteria used and findings- (full analysis availble)
    1. Avoidance of Regimentation? NO:
    2. Avoidance of Monopolistic Centers of Real Estate? NO:
    3. Avoidance of Monotony? NO:
    4. Appropriate Density? NO:
    5. Uses Parks as Focal Points? NO:
    6. Has Intricacy of Park Design? NO:
    7. Parks Are Designed with Desirable Centers? NO:
    8. Parks Are Designed So Sun Shines Within Them? NO:
    9. Park Design Makes Use of “Enclosure” to Define Park Space? NO:
    10. Building Creates Close-grained Weave of City Fabric? NO:
    11. Project Will Be Developed Gradually Working with City Fabric? NO:
    12. Avoidance of Projects Being Apart from Weave of City Fabric? NO:
    13. Project Participates in City Fluidity? NO:
    14. Project Creates Population Diversity? NO:
    15. Project Has Building Age Diversity with a Close-Grained Mingling? NO:
    16. Will There Be a Concentrated Diversity of Use? MAYBE NOT:
    17. Avoidance of Harmful Parking Lots? NO:
    18. Improved Mass Transit Bus Service by Avoidance of One-Way Streets? MAYBE NOT:
    19. Avoidance of Harmful Large and Heavy Trucking Depots? MAYBE NOT?:
    20. Avoidance of Harmful Gas Stations? MAYBE YES/MAYBE NO:
    21. Avoidance of Harmful Gigantic Outdoor Advertising? NO:
    22. Avoidance of Enterprises and Uses Harmful Because the Scale Is Wrong? NO:
    23. Protection Against Self-Destruction of Diversity of Building Use? NO:
    24. Avoidance of “Border Vacuums?” NO:
    25. Convert Borders to Seams? NO:
    26. Allowing People to Move up the Ladder Through “Unslumming”? NO:
    27. Use of Empiricism and Curiosity to Determine and Work with Actual Facts and Reality? NO:
    28. Observes the Goal of Creating Political Access (Including the Goal of Countering Public Money Expenditures)? NO:
    29. Using Public Participation in Shaping Cities? NO:
    30. Avoidance of Cataclysmic Money? NO:
    31. Making Good Use of Gradual Money? NO:
    32. Is Eminent Domain Being Used in a Way That the Full Cost of it Is Reckoned and Paid For? NO:
    33. Is Eminent Domain Being Used with Restraint? NO:
    34. Is Eminent Domain and its Threat Being Used Only with Full and Proper Public Comprehension? NO:
    35. Is Eminent Domain for Greed Being Avoided? NO:
    36. Best Way to Subsidize Dwellings? NO:
    37. Avoidance of Surges of People in Limited Time Frames? NO:
    38. Does Project Represent Healthy Decentralization and City Economics? NO:
    39. Keeping Blocks Short and Creating Extra Streets to Help Do So? NO:
    40. Avoidance of Superblocks? NO:
    41. Efforts to Use Sidewalks Well? NO:
    42. Creating Visual Closures with Bends and Irregularities in Street Grid? NO:
    43. Use of Landmarks: (Which Are Not Necessarily Created by Size)? PROBABLY NO:
    44. Going Beyond Appearance and Pretty Pictures to Actual Function? NO:
    45. Keeping Artificial Architectural Exhibitionism at Bay? NO:
    46. Does the Project Involve Good Deployment of Available Resources? NO:
    47. Building Buildings that relate to the streets and sidewalks with stoops and windows creating a system of “eyes”and participation in a “ballet” of the streets based interest and a weave of trusting relationship? N/A?:

  2. The entire Report Card is 23 pages of material. The lead-in to the report in addition to the 47 criteria is as follows:


    The following is a Jane Jacobs evaluation report card of the Atlantic Yards project. All of the criteria for the report card have been distilled from Jane Jacobs book “The Death and Life of Great American Cities” (1961). Some of the criteria involves overlaps which is quite natural since Jane Jacobs saw city systems as intricate relationships and interconnections affecting and sometimes generating each other, analogous in certain ways to human physiology and biology. Though some arguably imply or result in the others, I have broken down as many discrete principles as possible. I have not given comparative weight to the principles but since the project scores badly across the board this does not make a difference in coming to an overall assessment. Jane Jacobs herself highlighted four main criteria (p.150, 151) which are very well known. They are all represented below and most guidance she offers is somehow related to them, but the report card does not confine itself to just those four broad principles. By extracting and using all 47 identified standards, the report card tests more deeply and more completely. It also winds up applying what are often principles Jane Jacobs integrated from other thinkers who had thought competently about the same problems she was addressing.

    The four main principles Jane Jacobs herself identified as the most important points this book her book had to make are (in summary) that:

    • There should be mixed uses and functions that ensure that people are using the outdoors on different schedules and, as much as possible, are using facilities available in common.

    • Most blocks should be short and streets and opportunities to turn frequent.

    • There should be a good close-grained mingling of buildings that vary in age and condition, including a good proportion of old ones.

    • There should be a sufficiently dense concentration of people which should include people who are present because of residence.

    This report card rates Atlantic Yards almost entirely negatively by these Jane Jacobs criteria. It could be that I failed to extract some criteria within Jane Jacobs book that would yield a few positive assessments I missed. Arguably, I failed to apply some of these criteria as favorable to the project as I could or should. I don’t think either of these things is the case but people are free to raise specific quibbles. It is also possible that some of the standards Jane Jacobs suggests be followed arguably don’t make sense. Some have sought to “debunk” Jane Jacobs, but today her teachings and those of William H. Whyte are ingrained in the work of mainstream firms like Beyer Blinder Belle, the architectural firm which did the recent restoration work of Grand Central Station.

    There is also the question of whether Jane Jacobs’ ideas should be treated as any form of “gospel” something she herself would have questioned, though she would have readily endorsed the use of her ideas by those endeavoring to see for themselves and use common sense to reach their own conclusions. Based on things Jane Jacobs said about herself in life I was tempted to add a standard (in line with her constant empirical questioning) that people, including Ms. Jacobs should regard themselves as fallible and capable of mistakes. People need to know they are not God. Were this added as criteria #48 the project would not score well on it. Jane Jacobs knew that big plans tend to lead to big mistakes. It is far from clear that the megadeveloper of the Atlantic yards project adequately comprehends his mistakes or ability to make them. In the face of this, Jane Jacobs, although believing in her own fallibility, was famous for being right when the too many others had gotten it wrong.

    If this report card is only so much as just mostly correct, then this megadevelopment, shiny, new and expensive, can be expected to have a severely blighting effect on Brooklyn and city in which it is located. What it does and doesn’t do should be measured against the much better alternatives open to us.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…