Skip to main content

AY ombudsman faces critical audience, says Community Advisory Committee coming

Atlantic Yards ombudsman Forrest Taylor met a cordial but sometimes prickly audience last night at a meeting held by the Council of Brooklyn Neighborhoods (CBN), which has been significantly critical of the project and is a plaintiff challenging the Empire State Development Corporation’s (ESDC) environmental review of the project.

(Photos by Jonathan Barkey)

Taylor, appointed by the ESDC at the end of November after a 203-day wait, got high marks for his accessibility--CBN co-chair Candace Carponter said he always answered the phone. But several among the 60 or so people at St. Cyril's Belarusian Cathedral on Atlantic Avenue found him not-so-reassuring when he repeated the ESDC stance on issues of security and traffic.

City Council Member David Yassky reminded Taylor of concerns that streets might have to close, as in Newark, given that the glass-walled Atlantic Yards arena would be set back the same distance from the street. Taylor said the ESDC had been briefed by the New York Police Department, which is “100 percent comfortable with security measures.”

And Patti Hagan of the Prospect Heights Action Coalition reported that, in conversations with firefighters at Engine Company 219 on Dean Street near Sixth Avenue, which uses Carlton Avenue regularly to cross Atlantic Avenue to respond to calls, had not been briefed on the planned January 16 closing of the Carlton Avenue bridge.

Taylor said he wasn’t privy to internal Fire Department conversations, but that the ESDC had received assurances that the department could do its job despite the closed bridge. (Hagan further pointed out that the ESDC notice neglected to inform people the bridge would be closed for two years.)

Facilitator, not public advocate?

The meeting showed a contrast between two visions of the job: the ESDC wants a communicator, a fixer, who can bridge gaps between the many agencies and interested parties so essential information is exchanged. Community critics want a public advocate who might reach some independent conclusions.

“I think we thought an ombudsman would be a little more objective,” said CBN co-chair Terry Urban (at right, with Taylor) after the hour-long meeting. “We want him to ask them [agencies like the police and fire departments] to go further.”

Taylor, for his part, called the evening “illuminating. You get to hear what people are feeling. They won’t always like the answers, but at least there’s someone to reach.” Tieless at the end of the day, he was cordial but unflappable, and when speeches ended in murky questions he sometimes said he didn’t understand the point.

Another body may have to break the logjam in some instances. City Council Member Letitia James said that she’d requested that the Council’s Public Safety Committee question the police department regarding security plans. Added Yassky, “we’d like to get the police department... to be as public as possible.” (At right, Yassky, with James in background.)

As Daniel Goldstein of Develop Don’t Destroy Brooklyn (DDDB) put it, “The thing that’s hanging out there is, ‘How is this different from Newark?’”

Job description

Taylor began by describing his two main responsibilities: to bring issues of community concern back to the ESDC, and to “keep the project on track” by coordinating among the “alphabet-soup list of agencies” responsible for some aspect of Atlantic Yards. “Obviously a project as large as this is going to create headaches,” he said. “My job is to minimize them.”

While Taylor has been working out of ESDC’s Midtown Manhattan offices, he said he plans to soon move to 55 Hanson Place in Fort Greene, an office building which also houses the office of Assemblymember Hakeem Jeffries and is a few steps away from a building with the office of Council Member James.

CBN asked members of the audience to introduce themselves and state their organizational affiliation and neighborhood location. One Dean Street resident described her location as “directly across from the project.” Goldstein (right), whose Pacific Street condo would be demolished for AY, quipped that he was “directly under the project.”

Community Advisory Committee coming

Carponter reminded Taylor of a letter CBN sent ESDC last fall asking for a progress report on oversight measures announced in May. Taylor said an interagency working group “will be working on a monthly basis.”

As for a transportation working group, he said it would be “a subcommittee of a newly-reconstituted Community Advisory Committee.” (Such a committee was established during the approval process, but hardly met. (Updated) Also, the environmental lawsuit says a required CAC was limited to representatives of the three Community Boards, the ESDC, New York City, and the Brooklyn Borough President's office and thus did not have meaningful participation.)

He said local elected officials would shortly be asked to nominate members, as would the three affected Brooklyn Community Boards: 2, 6, and 8. And how often would the committee meet? At least quarterly, he said, a frequency that provoked some derisive sounds from the audience.

Would meetings be open? That’s up to the CAC. While Taylor was asked if CBN would get a representative, he responded, “You know your elected officials just as well as I do.”

What do you say?” asked DDDB's Lucy Koteen of James.

“Yes,” the Council member responded.

Still, it seems a good distance from the new governance structure proposed by BrooklynSpeaks.

Bridge closing

Koteen said that the closing of the Carlton Avenue bridge would put a squeeze on traffic. “I would’ve appreciated it if agencies had come to discuss it with the community,” she said, giving the Fort Greene Association as an example.

“Duly noted,” said Taylor, adding, “Certainly this was looked at by the DOT [Department of Transportation].”

A resident of Dean Street between Fourth and Fifth avenues noted that residents faced gridlock 12 hours a day and asked what’s being done to mitigate it. “There are several things in this voluminous document,” Taylor responded, referring to the Final Environmental Impact Statement.

Maureen Shea (right) of Park Slope Greens observed that, “in general this project has ignored the experience of the pedestrian.” She asked what Taylor’s office would do “if the project doesn’t go forward,” an outcome she desires.

“We’re not contemplating the project not going forward,” Taylor responded sharply. “The project has been approved” and is moving forward. (Still, two major lawsuits remain unresolved.)

Money questions

Yassky, who got far weaker applause than did James, asked Taylor if a funding agreement had been finalized for the project, presumably for the direct subsidies. “There’s a city part and a state part,” Taylor said. “I think the state is done.” However, it’s one agreement, so “until both are done, neither are done.”

Goldstein asked if agreements regarding housing subsidies and payments in lieu of taxes (PILOTs) had been finalized. Taylor said no.

Vote of support

At least one person at the meeting, former Fort Greene Association chairman Howard Pitsch, expressed support for the project, stating he was encouraged to learn, via a Courier-Life article, of Forest City Ratner’s “very good” track record hiring minority- and women-owned businesses.

Will Taylor help ensure continuance of such hiring, Pitsch asked. Taylor said the first e-mail he got was from a minority businessperson. “It was pretty easy to set them up with Forest City Ratner.”

Interesting, not “sexy”

After the meeting, I asked Taylor, who has a background in city government, state government, and as a consultant/lobbyist, how he came to take the job. “Someone reached out,” he said. “It was an interesting project, a big project, a high-profile project. It excited me.”

He has apparently learned to not describe Atlantic Yards as a “sexy project,” as he did in a Daily News interview after his appointment.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…