Skip to main content

Revamping Empire State Development: stop playing politics, says report

A consultant's study was issued Tuesday calling for reform of Empire State Development (ESD), the state's chief economic development agency, which encompasses the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC), the agency that has shepherded and approved the Atlantic Yards plan and oversees other large development projects.

The focus, in press coverage, was on technical fixes and a failed job-creation program. Only a close look at the report shows that, in key places, the analysts blame certain ESD/ESDC failures on "political patronage," "political convenience," and the "practice of favoring political over economic criteria."

In other words, a report commissioned by the administration of new Gov. Eliot Spitzer , a Democrat, takes strong issue with the practices of ESD/ESDC under longtime Gov. George Pataki, a Republican.

The report doesn't mention Atlantic Yards, but there's certainly evidence that the ESDC's board, which I described as "team players and big donors," didn't closely scrutinize the project when it was approved last November.

Press coverage

The lead from a widely-distributed Reuters article yesterday: New York state's economic development agency needs a top-to-bottom overhaul starting with a name change, to refocus it on creating higher-paying jobs instead of fighting poverty...

The New York Sun, the only city daily to cover it, in an article headlined Study Calls for Big Changes At Empire State Development, began:
A new state-commissioned study is recommending a major administrative overhaul for New York's primary economic development agency, Empire State Development, calling it far too decentralized and lacking in strategic vision to promote a thriving statewide business climate.

The Sun also pointed out that the Spitzer administration is preparing to send letters to more than 3,000 companies pointing out that they have not met their job creation targets...

The official press release:
New York State could double its rate of job growth by focusing statewide and regional economic development investments on emerging sectors of the “Innovation Economy” such as nanotechnology, bioscience and cleantech, according to a report prepared by global management consulting firm A.T. Kearney for the state’s Empire State Development organization.

Report basis

The consultants conducted interviews with 74 New York State-based executives from 65 companies and met with leaders of regional economic development organizations, legislators, professors and other subject matter experts.

The report is diplomatic. Unmentioned is the name Charles Gargano, former chairman of the ESDC, who served as the chief fundraiser for Pataki. As I reported 2/16/06:
An 11/7/99 review by the Daily News showed that 40 of 201 companies that received ESDC loans or grants had given political contributions to Gov. Pataki or other Republican causes. In a 9/26/96 article in Newsday, state Sen. Franz Leichter, a Democrat from Manhattan, called the ESDC a "political slush fund" for Pataki, citing 11 procurement contracts to firms politically linked to Republicans.

Changing the name

The report says the agency's name is confusing:
That said, almost everything about the historical ESD needs to change, beginning with its name, which fails to leverage the state’s most recognizable asset, the words “New York.”

Empire Zones

The report severely criticizes a supposed job-creation strategy:
Of all the programs examined here New York’s Empire Zones program provides perhaps the best example of good economic development intentions gone wrong. Its original mission has been morphed by political patronage, legislative revision and commercial manipulation, effectively repositioning it from a program primarily helping distressed communities to one routinely offering tax relief for ongoing businesses.

Moving forward

The report calls for more institutional integrity:
History is not ESD’s friend. The agency lost the full confidence of the legislature years ago, largely for good reason…

The first step on the journey requires ESD to reject its legacy of regional patronage, a pattern of funding one-off solutions, and a perceived preference for practicing the economics of political convenience.

ESDC and more

One section of the report looks closely at subsidiaries, notably ESDC:
One of ESD’s products that is most visible to New Yorkers is its network of subsidiaries. This portfolio of large deals targets development in urban areas and economically challenged communities.

Subsidiaries [of ESDC] include such projects such as Lower Manhattan Development Corporation, the Queens West Development Corporation, and Moynihan Station Development Corporation. New York can scarcely afford to squander any opportunity to improve its infrastructure. To date, delay and design flaws have characterized much of the work done under these subsidiary organizations. In most cases the problems have stemmed from ESD’s practice of favoring political over economic criteria in making major project decisions…

(Emphasis added)

A solution:
In order to correct this, ESD will need to tighten its management control over the subsidiaries and ensure that each entity’s operations are publicly transparent and financially responsible.

Interestingly enough, Atlantic Yards is not yet managed by a subsidiary; critics like BrooklynSpeaks have called such a subsidiary crucial to public input and transparency if the project moves forward.

Parent vs. subsidiary?

So, what's the difference between parent and subsidiary? Empire State Development (ESD) is New York State's lead economic development agency. It is the parent of the Empire State Development Corporation (formerly known as the Urban Development Corporation) and the Job Development Authority, among other subsidiaries.

Often, however, the names Empire State Development Corporation and Empire State Development have been used interchangeably. For example, in this official press release, Patrick Foye is described as "Empire State Development Chairman/Downstate." In this official press release, he's described as "Empire State Development Corporation Chairman/Downstate."


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…