Skip to main content

The new (bogus) buzzword: revised plan for office towers would "activate" Atlantic Avenue corridor

This is among multiple articles covering issues raised at the March 15 Atlantic Yards Community Development Corporation (AY CDC) meeting.

"Activate the Atlantic Avenue corridor."

That's one confounding justification by Greenland Forest City Partners for its brazen, highly questionable plan to shift 1.1 million square feet of bulk from the tower planned for the arena plaza across the street to Site 5, creating what I've dubbed the "Brooklyn Behemoth," with 1.6 million square feet--and then turn B4, the large tower planned at the northeast corner of the arena block, from residential to office uses.


The jargon-y claim--as if somehow office workers from one building would cross broad Flatbush Avenue to commune with the other building--strikes me as a fig leaf to get a plan passed that exceeds previously disclosed ambitions.

The rationale begins

Speaking at the 3/15/16 meeting of the Atlantic Yards Community Development Corporation, Forest City spokeswoman Ashley Cotton began by saying that overall square footage, residential units, and affordable housing requirements for the project stayed the same.

(Unmentioned: they now seek to pack the entire square footage into 15 rather than 16 towers, and seemingly aim for a larger combination of office units and apartments than previously permitted, which implies less space for the same number of housing units.)

The proposal, Cotton said, would require "extensive public review," including modifications to the General Project Plan (GPP), a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, and public hearings, before going to the board of Empire State Development (ESD), the state authority that oversees/shepherds the project.

Unmentioned: the gubernatorially-controlled ESD board is essentially a rubber stamp.

Site 5 in foreground; B4 site is at northeast end of arena block, wall past plaza and arena entrances
Two of three goals (and unmentioned savings)

"By making this change, we think we can accomplish three things," Cotton said (at about 42 minutes of the video at bottom). The first two: delivering jobs and keeping the plaza as permanent open space.

Unmentioned: that saves them the complicated and costly exercise of trying to build around an operating arena, and saves arena operator Mikhail Prokhorov the headache of surrounding construction.

I wouldn't be surprised if, as part of the deal to sell the arena operating company to Prokhorov, Forest City pledged not to build B1. Also, it's not clear that they would build all the office space--they need an anchor tenant, or perhaps subsidies--though "jobs" offers good rhetoric.

A previous (and tentative) timetable for the plan

Third goal: "activate" the corridor

"And three, we think we can activate the Atlantic Avenue corridor," Cotton said.

How? She then elaborated on plans for commercial use at B4, which is currently permitted to be a residential tower, with retail at the base. Previously, the B2 tower was permitted for commercial use, but is being finished as a modular residential tower.

"So now we want to examine the potential of commercial use along Atlantic Avenue, instead of Flatbush Avenue, where B2 is located," she said. "Put another way, we want to shift the focus of the permitted commercial uses under the GPP from Flatbush to Atlantic."

"The concept is that B4 and Site 5 are developed as substantial commercial projects that will act as bookends on the Atlantic Avenue corridor," she said, "generating jobs, substantial foot traffic, and activity at this critical location."

Drilling down

What the heck does "activate"--a piece of planners' jargon--really mean? What's the "Atlantic Avenue corridor? And who benefits?

"Activate" apparently means getting foot traffic along Atlantic Avenue between Sixth Avenue, the eastern edge of the B4 site, and Site 5, which sits between Flatbush and Fourth avenues along Atlantic.

But why? There's no natural connection between B4 and Site 5, not with the long walk to cross Flatbush. They could generate "activity" and "jobs" if they built the tower on the arena plaza as approved; they just don't want to absorb the costs.

And they could "activate" the Atlantic Avenue corridor by building the residential tower already approved. It might not bring the same lunch crowd, but it would bring more activity over a longer period of the day.

Street use patterns

Would office workers in Site 5 have any reason to cross Flatbush to go to Atlantic and Sixth? I doubt it.

If Site 5 has retail that evokes the Time Warner Center, as hinted, workers will go downstairs. They'd have options west along Atlantic Avenue and south along Fifth Avenue--and even southeast along Flatbush Avenue--before crossing over to the arena plaza and then B4.

A previous plan for the project; the developers now seek to axe the tower over the arena plaza and make the B4 tower
commercial, but B4 workers would likely visit malls across the street before going to Site 5 (far west)
What about workers at B4? Yes, some might want to visit Site 5. But surely they'd first visit retail outlets in the base of their building, or across the street in the Forest City Ratner-built (and still majority-owned) Atlantic Center and Atlantic Terminal malls. Maybe the catercorner Tony Roma's, in Atlantic Terrace. Maybe they'd walk down Sixth Avenue to Flatbush.

What about commuting patterns? Site 5 workers taking the subway or Long Island Rail Road would have no need to walk along Atlantic.

B4 workers arriving by subway would mainly exit from the arena plaza. Those taking the Long Island Rail Road would traverse the north side of Atlantic Avenue from the Atlantic Terminal mall.

Changing the game

We should be used to hearing changing justifications. Remember, all four towers around the arena, when the project was announced in 2003, were supposed to be commercial space, to serve as a buffer. Then the office market tanked, and they swapped most office space for condos.

Then the focus was supposed to be on the gateway at Atlantic and Flatbush.

Consider: in the 2006 Final Environmental Impact Statement (Chapter 3, Land Use), the ESD suggested that the "commercial office and residential uses in Building 1 and on Site 5 would be located along Flatbush and Atlantic Avenues, where they would act as an extension of the Downtown Brooklyn central business district and be similar to higher-density uses north of Atlantic Avenue."

Now they're aiming further down Atlantic to the B4 tower.

And now we're supposed to forget the stress on B1, in both the 2006 and 2009 General Project Plans:
The development of both Site 5 and Building 1, with high density buildings, is central to the goal of the Project in order to transform this very public and prominent area by creating architecturally significant buildings that would surround and connect to the Transportation Hub and by developing uses that would activate and create a vibrant streetscape experience for the public.
Packing more in?

From 2006 GPP
As noted in the excerpt at right from the 2006 General Project Plan (GPP), the residential variation of the project--the plan under which it has proceeded--would have 6,430 apartments and 336,000 square feet of office space.

The commercial variation of the project would have 5,325 apartments (including the same 2,250 affordable units) and 1.6 million square feet of office space.

The thing to watch for now is whether they will try to build (close to) 1.6 million square feet of office space and 6,430 apartments--or, at least, more than 5,325.

That would be squeezing more than what was originally approved--and in one fewer building.

How much activation?

It's unclear sure how much "activation" Atlantic Avenue outside the arena can take.

But an office crowd, if not a residential crowd, could help revive retail along the northern edge of the arena, so could "activate Atlantic Avenue" be a gesture to Prokhorov? Once metroPCS and the Elbow Room had public-facing retail space, but not any more.

As I wrote in May 2013, the Department of City Planning once urged a “b-market” along Atlantic outside the arena, a narrow strip of retail to accommodate smaller shops and enhance foot traffic. That frustrated original arena architect Frank Gehry--"the idea of creating storefronts on Atlantic Avenue–there’s not much depth to deal with,” he said--and it never materialized.

There doesn't seem room for such a b-market. But maybe they hope to use the arena parking lane for food trucks during the day.

If that's their plan to "activate Atlantic Avenue," they should say so.

Otherwise, it's a distraction to ease approval of a plan to stuff the project into a smaller number of buildings, and to create a giant building on a too-small site.

Update: a comment from some local stakeholders:



Comments

  1. Using food trucks to "activate" the Atlantic Avenue corridor would be the economic equivalent of a 200 car pile up for local businesses. So much for economic development for the community.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

No, security guards can't ban photos. Questions remain about visibility of ID/sticker system.

The bi-monthly Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Community Update meeting June 14, held at 55 Hanson Place, addressed multiple issues, including delays in the project, a new detente with project neighbors,concerns about traffic congestion, upcoming sewer work and demolitions, and an explanation of how high winds caused debris to fly off the under-construction 38 Sixth Avenue building. I'll have more coverage.
Security issues came up several times at the meeting.
Wayne Bailey, a resident who regularly takes photos and videos (that I often use) of construction/operations issues that impact residents, asked representatives of Tishman Construction if the security guard at the sites they're building works for them.
After Tishman Senior VP Eric Reid said yes, Bailey asked why a guard told him not to shoot video of the site, even though he was on a public street.

"I will address it with principals for that security firm," Reid said.
Forest City Ratner executive Ashley Cotton, the …

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park graphic: what's built/what might be coming (post-dated pinned post)

Click on graphic to enlarge. This is post-dated to stay at the top of the blog. It will be updated as announced configurations change and buildings launch. The August 2014 tentative configurations proposed by developer Greenland Forest City Partners will change, and the project is already well behind that tentative timetable.


Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…