Skip to main content

Will a correction finally sideline the Times's "Downtown Brooklyn" mistake?

The Atlantic Yards project would be located near Downtown Brooklyn in Prospect Heights, but developer Forest City Ratner has from the beginning described the project as being located in Downtown Brooklyn: Frank Gehry, internationally acclaimed architect, unveils vision for world-class basketball arena and mixed-use complex for downtown Brooklyn.

Since then, the company has regularly used the term "Downtown Brooklyn," as have public officials and often the press. For example, Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz, in his testimony at the 5/26/05 City Council hearing, referred to "the Atlantic Yards project in Downtown Brooklyn." His biographical sketch says that "Marty conceived the idea of moving the team from New Jersey to a new Downtown arena at Atlantic Yards."

Also, FCR touts the Downtown Brooklyn rezoning (which does not encompass the Atlantic Yards footprint) as justification for the density sought in the new development. (The project would be located just below Atlantic Avenue, east of Flatbush Avenue, above.)

But there's a difference between downtown and a mostly low-rise neighborhood like Prospect Heights (where the Dean Street buildings at right in project footprint are slated for demolition). So the choice of language has a political implication, and numerous media outlets have used the inaccurate "Downtown Brooklyn" description. In my 9/1/05 report criticizing the New York Times, I pointed out dozens of such errors in the Times's coverage.

The Times: better but inconsistent

Has the Times improved its performance since my report? Yes, but it took months, and errors have persisted outside the Metro section. Just yesterday the "Downtown Brooklyn" description appeared in a Sports section article. Apparently, the Sports desk didn't get the memo--there actually is a memo, a stylesheet of "factual pitfalls" created by the Metro desk, as noted below.

The Times now more often uses the "near Downtown Brooklyn" term, but the newspaper has never published a correction. Instead, the use of the correct term represents a variant of "rowback," which former Times Public Editor Daniel Okrent described in his 3/14/04 column as "a way that a newspaper can cover its butt without admitting it was ever exposed."

But the Times has published so many errors--and enough recent ones, including the one yesterday--that a correction is overdue. Maybe that will put the entire staff on notice.

Remember, the Times's policy, according to its 2004 Ethical Journalism handbook, states:
The Times treats its readers as fairly and openly as possible. In print and online, we tell our readers the complete, unvarnished truth as best we can learn it. It is our policy to correct our errors, large and small, as soon as we become aware of them

Going to the sources

Before looking at the Times's record of coverage, note that, despite Forest City Ratner's definition, other sources locate the Atlantic Yards footprint outside Downtown Brooklyn. The Department of City Planning, which produced the map at right, describes Downtown Brooklyn as "generally bounded by Tillary Street to the north, Ashland Place to the east, Atlantic Center and Schermerhorn Street to the south, and Court Street to the west." On the map at right, the dotted lines encompass the area to be rezoned. The Atlantic Terminal mall appears in the southeast corner, with the Atlantic Center mall (not pictured) just to the east. Note that the two malls, both on the north side of Atlantic Avenue, would be across Atlantic Avenue north of the Atlantic Yards site, and that the far southeast tip of the rezoning was eventually taken out of the Downtown Brooklyn plan because it's in the Atlantic Yards footprint.

The New York City Economic Development Corporation, in a presentation called "Betting on Brooklyn" issued 12/9/04 (a year after the Atlantic Yards project was unveiled), treats Flatbush Avenue as the eastern boundary of Downtown Brooklyn (see p. 11).

An authoritative book, The Neighborhoods of Brooklyn, published in 2004, describes the Atlantic Center Mall as being in Fort Greene and says that the western border of Prospect Heights is Flatbush Avenue and the northern border Atlantic Avenue. And the Times itself, in a 12/18/05 Real Estate section profile of Prospect Heights, mapped out the neighborhood in the graphic at right.

Several government entities have avoided using the term "Downtown Brooklyn." The Independent Budget Office, in its 9/05 report, Atlantic Yards: A Net Fiscal Benefit for the City?, describes "Brooklyn’s Atlantic Yards area" and a "development [that] borders the neighborhoods of Prospect Heights, Fort Greene, and Park Slope."

The Final Environmental Impact Statement for the rezoning for Downtown Brooklyn Development, issued in April 2004, doesn't use the term Downtown Brooklyn to describe the site for the Atlantic Yards project. Rather, on p. S-14 of the Executive Summary it calls the location "the Atlantic Terminal neighborhood." (More on ATURA.) The May 2005 Downtown Brooklyn Transportation Blueprint describes the Atlantic Yards project as in "the Atlantic Terminal/Atlantic Yards Area." The Empire State Development Corporation's Draft Scope of Analysis for an Environmental Impact Statement also locates the project "in the Atlantic Terminal area of Brooklyn," as does the Final Scope.

Recent errors, and precision

Since the publication of my report, the Times's description of the site location has been inconsistent, as the "Downtown Brooklyn" description has continued, but it has improved significantly in the Metro section, which now uses the term "near Downtown Brooklyn."

9/3/05: The publication is paid for by Forest City Ratner, the company promoting a proposed $3.5 billion arena project for downtown Brooklyn, and most of the articles, well, promote a proposed $3.5 billion arena project for downtown Brooklyn.--Builder's Publication Supports Brooklyn Arena, Metro section

10/14/05: In the two years since he announced his ambitious Atlantic Yards development in downtown Brooklyn--from To Build Arena in Brooklyn, Developer First Builds Bridges, Metro section

10/19/05: Opponents, many of whom said they lived at or near the project site - near Downtown Brooklyn at the intersection of Atlantic and Flatbush Avenues--The People Speak (Shout, Actually) on Brooklyn Arena Project, Metro section

12/16/05: Another Step for Downtown Brooklyn Project--headline on Metro section article

1/15/06: Since Brooklyn is already roaring with controversy over new developments, including a planned Ikea and a Fairway in Red Hook and the Atlantic Yards project downtown--City Weekly section, A Desire Named Streetcar

1/19/06: "You should know that we have prepared a style sheet covering some of the factual pitfalls in covering this controversy, and your efforts have been most helpful in that regard."--New York Times Deputy Metro Editor Patrick LaForge, in an email to me

2/15/06: The project, which would rise over a railyard and adjacent land off Flatbush Avenue near Downtown Brooklyn--Demolition Can Proceed for Brooklyn Arena Project, Metro section

2/19/06: The Nets are playing in an arena surrounded by new parking garages for an amusement park that will be built before they split for downtown Brooklyn.--While Nets Are Headed East, Knicks Are Going South, Sports section column

3/9/06: The first visible change to the site of the proposed $3.5 billion Atlantic Yards development near Downtown Brooklyn--The First Sign of a Brooklyn Development Is a Demolition, Metro section

4/10/06: When Bruce Ratner first announced plans to build Atlantic Yards, a vast residential, office and arena project on 22 acres near Downtown Brooklyn-- Forced to Move, Some Find Greener Grass, Metro section

4/11/06: The Nets can't leave the Meadowlands soon enough for what they believe will be the friendlier financial confines of downtown Brooklyn.--Nets' Chances Look Good; Books Don't, Sports section column

Previous performance

Chapter 11 of my 9/1/05 report cites numerous errors over two years, from the summer of 2003 through the summer of 2005, along with occasional correct descriptions:

Between 8/8/03 and 12/23/03, 14 of 36 Times articles that mentioned Bruce Ratner and his effort to buy the Nets, most of which were in the Sports section, incorrectly located the project in “Downtown Brooklyn.” The most substantial story contained an accurate description (A Grand Plan in Brooklyn For the Nets’ Arena Complex, 12/11/03): a Frank Gehry-designed arena for the Nets basketball team near Downtown Brooklyn.

However, the following 14 articles incorrectly used the term “downtown”: YankeeNets Unravels, And Teams May Move, 8/8/03; 2 Investment Banks Asked to Help in Nets Sale, 9/16/03; New Bids for the Nets Are Due on Monday, 11/8/03; 4 Bids Entered to Buy Nets From YankeeNets, 11/11/03; A YankeeNets Split Is Not a Simple, Straightforward Transaction, 11/13/03; 4 Bids for Nets to Be Reviewed, 11/19/03; Delay in YankeeNets Breakup Makes Bidders for Nets Wait, 11/20/03; How the Nets Won The Right to Move, 11/25/03; Islanders Owner Withdraws Bid to Buy the Nets, 12/5/03; An Outline Is Approved For the Sale of the Nets, 12/9/03; Wooing Nets, McGreevey Plans Rail Spur to Meadowlands, 12/11/03; Port Authority Budget Is Approved on Schedule, 12/12/03; Developer Wants His Project, And Buying Nets Hinges on It, 12/12/03; BAT AND BALL; A TRAIN TO THE NETS?, 12/14/03

The errors continued in 2004. A front-page story repeated the geographical
mistake (Nets Are Sold for $300 Million, And Dream Grows in Brooklyn, 1/22/04): Bruce C. Ratner, the developer who wants to move the New Jersey Nets to downtown Brooklyn

Another Sports section story also erred (Ratner’s Path To Buy Nets Had Pitfalls
And Promise, 1/25/04): Ratner’s pursuit of the Nets began 14 months ago, long before he put the team and a proposed arena at the center of Atlantic Yards, a $2.5 billion commercial and residential complex in downtown Brooklyn.

One City Weekly section article sited the arena in Downtown Brooklyn and neglected to mention that the rest of the project extends into other neighborhoods (NEIGHBORHOOD REPORT: DOWNTOWN BROOKLYN; To Some, the Nets Are a Slam Dunk, to Others a Technical Foul, 1/25/04): …will bring a 19,000-seat arena and other improvements to Flatbush and Atlantic Avenues in Downtown Brooklyn.

A letter unheeded

The Times even printed a letter informing the paper of the correct location and neighborhood name (Proposed Arena: Location, Location, 2/15/04): Prospect Heights residents consider the site of this arena for the New Jersey Nets not Downtown Brooklyn but Prospect Heights. That’s where Bruce Ratner plans to destroy homes and businesses. Ours is a residential not a business district.

Is the location of the proposed project simply a matter of opinion, or can the facts be established? Though the Times published the instructive letter, the paper has not consistently heeded the letter writer’s admonition.

Indeed, a Sports section story less than two weeks later got the location wrong (Move Looms, but Nets Fans Aren’t Ready to Let Go Just Yet, 2/28/04): Bruce C. Ratner, who wants to make the Nets the centerpiece of a downtown Brooklyn development…

A subsequent article was more accurate (Arena Developer Rethinking Condemnation of Houses, 5/5/04): The proposed development, which would bring a Frank Gehry–designed arena along with 4,500 residential units and four office towers to the crossroads of Prospect Heights, Fort Greene and Downtown Brooklyn

A City Weekly section editorial got it right (The Brooklyn Nets, 7/4/04): A basketball arena near downtown Brooklyn

A sports column got it wrong (Nets’ Future Is an Arena In Brooklyn, 7/20/04):
Some people believe that all Ratner wants from the Nets is an arena in downtown Brooklyn, surrounded by apartment buildings.

A brief article got it wrong (Developer Vows To Benefit Community, 10/8/04): the large project [Ratner] wants to build in downtown Brooklyn, which includes a new arena for the Nets, housing and commercial space.

Another article got it wrong (What the Teams Want And What the City Gets, 1/16/05): on a 21-acre site in downtown Brooklyn.

An editorial in the national edition repeated the error (A Triple Play for New York Teams, 3/27/05): a Frank Gehry–designed arena in downtown Brooklyn

A news story repeated the error (Miller Backs $3.5 Billion Plan For Brooklyn
Sports Complex, 6/5/05): City Council Speaker Gifford Miller announced his support yesterday for a $3.5 billion arena, office, and apartment complex in Downtown Brooklyn, giving the developer Bruce Ratner a key ally in his push for city approval of the project.

Occasional accuracy

When new Frank Gehry designs were released, a front-page story was more accurate (Instant Skyline Added to Brooklyn Arena Plan, 7/5/05): a new Nets arena east of Downtown Brooklyn…

A follow-up article also was accurate (Brooklynites Take In a Big Development
Plan, and Speak Up, 7/6/05): a proposed Nets arena east of Downtown Brooklyn

An article the next day was close, but still wrong (Brooklyn Plan Draws a Rival,
And It’s Smaller, 7/7/05): ... Ratner’s ambitious plan to create a dense urban hub at the eastern edge of Downtown Brooklyn.

The Times repeated its general mistake in a City Weekly section editorial a few days later (Skyscrapers Grow in Brooklyn, 7/10/05): Reports that there are now competing bids to develop Brooklyn’s downtown

A headline on a letter responding to that editorial got it wrong (A Plan for
Skyscrapers In Downtown Brooklyn, 7/17/05). The error was repeated later that month (Rival Bid Tops Ratner’s Offer To Develop Brooklyn Site, 7/23/05): …a $150 million cash offer for development rights at the Atlantic railyard in Downtown Brooklyn

The error was repeated a few days later (M.T.A. to Deal Only With Ratner on
Brooklyn Bid, 7/28/05): the rights to build an arena for the Nets and office and residential buildings over a railyard in Downtown Brooklyn.
[This is a variant of the open railyard error.]

Another article that day repeated the error (M.T.A. Announces Big Surplus,
With New Plan for West Side Site, 7/28/05): at another railyard it owns in Downtown Brooklyn.

A columnist, in a casual aside, continued the error (Foreign Policy? Just Get Tips From the Cabby, 8/5/05): For instance, he [U.N. Ambassador John Bolton] might want to get together with the developer Bruce C. Ratner and also with critics of Mr. Ratner’s plan to build a sports arena in Downtown Brooklyn alongside skyscrapers that may rise 60 stories.


Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

No, security guards can't ban photos. Questions remain about visibility of ID/sticker system.

The bi-monthly Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Community Update meeting June 14, held at 55 Hanson Place, addressed multiple issues, including delays in the project, a new detente with project neighbors,concerns about traffic congestion, upcoming sewer work and demolitions, and an explanation of how high winds caused debris to fly off the under-construction 38 Sixth Avenue building. I'll have more coverage.
Security issues came up several times at the meeting.
Wayne Bailey, a resident who regularly takes photos and videos (that I often use) of construction/operations issues that impact residents, asked representatives of Tishman Construction if the security guard at the sites they're building works for them.
After Tishman Senior VP Eric Reid said yes, Bailey asked why a guard told him not to shoot video of the site, even though he was on a public street.

"I will address it with principals for that security firm," Reid said.
Forest City Ratner executive Ashley Cotton, the …

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park graphic: what's built/what might be coming (post-dated pinned post)

This graphic, posted in November 2017, is post-dated to stay at the top of the blog. It will be updated as announced configurations change and buildings launch. Note the unbuilt B1 and the proposed shift in bulk to the unbuilt Site 5.

The August 2014 tentative configurations proposed by developer Greenland Forest City Partners will change. The project is already well behind that tentative timetable.

How many people are expected?

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park has a projected 6,430 apartments housing 2.1 persons per unit (as per Chapter 4 of the 2006 Final Environmental Impact Statement), which would mean 13,503 new residents, with 1,890 among them in low-income affordable rentals, and 2,835 in moderate- and middle-income affordable rentals.

That leaves 8,778 people in market-rate rentals and condos, though let's call it 8,358 after subtracting 420 who may live in 200 promised below-market condos. So that's 5,145 in below-market units, though many of them won't be so cheap.


Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park in 2017: no new towers, unfilled affordable units, Islanders prepare to leave, project timetable fuzzy

My 2018 preview.

It was another wait-and-see year for Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, with one big twist--the beginning of a slow goodbye for the New York Islanders--but continued delays for towers, a lost (mostly) 421-a subsidy for condos, and new skepticism about unfilled not-so-affordable housing units.

So ongoing questions linger regarding the project's pace, affordability, and even future ownership.

In my 2017 preview, I predicted--not exactly going out on a limb--that two and likely three more towers would open, though it would be unclear how fast they'd lease up and sell.

Indeed, we've learned that the middle-income below-market units at 461 Dean (which opened in 2016) and 535 Carlton have leased very slowly, while it's too soon to assess progress for commensurate units at 38 Sixth. (At 535 Carlton and 38 Sixth, middle-income units make up half the "100% affordable" buildings.) Meanwhile, many apartments are up for rent at the 550 Vanderbilt condo buildin…