Skip to main content

Forest City responds to hedge fund's critique, calls it hasty and counterproductive (but ignores some specifics)

Yesterday, Forest City Realty Trust issued both a public statement and a (public) message to employees in response to the harsh letter from the hedge fund Land & Buildings.

The statement noted that Land & Buildings had less than 1% of shares--a previous report said 1% and said the hedge fund had not engaged with the company before submitting a notice of intent to nominate members of the board of directors. Forest City noted that its "governance enhancements... were well received by shareholders"--indeed, the largest outside shareholder approved--and said it was "executing on a strategic plan" to improve performance.

Forest City, however, did not address charges of nepotism, the accusation that its G&A (general & administrative) costs were out of line, and the charge that Forest City Ratner, the New York subsidiary, was responsible for significant underperformance.

As noted by the Plain Dealer, Forest City's shares went up yesterday by 1.6%. That's more than Vanguard's REIT index, which went up .77%.

The statement:
Forest City is committed to acting in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders and values feedback from all shareholders. Following discussions with and input from the Company’s largest shareholders, the Board and management team took significant steps to enhance the Company’s corporate governance by entering into agreements to declassify its common equity, appoint two new independent directors and adopt a majority voting standard for the election of directors.
Following Forest City’s press release announcing these corporate governance changes on December 6, 2016, including a proposal to eliminate the Company’s dual-class share structure, Land & Buildings purchased less than 1% of Forest City’s outstanding Class A Common Stock and submitted a notice of its intent to nominate three individuals for the election of Class A Directors to the Forest City Board of Directors at the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting, the last day that shareholders could legally submit proposals to the Company. Land & Buildings made no attempt to engage with management on this issue prior to the submission of their candidates and requested priority and approval rights over other shareholders.
After their submission, Company management met with Land & Buildings to discuss their proposed candidates and Land & Buildings indicated that although their candidates were qualified, that there were a number of other industry executives they believed to be better candidates than their own nominees. Land & Buildings provided a list of 11 additional potential board candidates. Consistent with our fiduciary duties and as communicated in our numerous conversations with the firm’s Founder and CIO, Jonathan Litt, Land & Buildings’ formal and informal nominees will be vetted and considered in the search process for two new, independent directors.
We are surprised that after working with our shareholders and announcing our governance enhancements, which were well received by shareholders, and prior to learning who Forest City’s new independent director nominees will be, Land & Buildings would choose this counterproductive path. Forest City has articulated and is executing on a strategic plan to build a strong sustainable capital structure, focus on core markets and products, and achieve operational excellence. Moving forward, Forest City will continue to make decisions and take actions that are in the best interests of the Company’s shareholders. The Company looks forward to continuing its open, constructive dialogue with shareholders as it executes its strategic plan to create shareholder value.
As previously announced on December 6, 2016, Forest City entered into an agreement to eliminate the Company’s dual-class share structure and also announced a number of other corporate governance enhancements and Board changes. As part of these Board changes, Bruce C. Ratner has stepped down from the Board. In addition, Stan Ross has decided not to stand for re-election at the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting. The Company intends to fill these two board vacancies with new, independent directors and has retained Ferguson Partners Ltd. to lead the search for highly qualified candidates.
The Company also announced the retirement of Charles Ratner from the Company and as Executive Chairman of the Forest City Board, and the appointment of James A. Ratner as non-executive Chairman of the Forest City Board, succeeding Charles Ratner as of year-end 2016. Following these actions, the Board will be comprised of thirteen directors, eight of whom will be independent, one of whom will be the President and Chief Executive Officer, and four of whom will be members of the founding family, the Company’s largest non-institutional shareholder. Furthermore, the Company announced plans to implement a majority voting standard in the election of directors following the 2017 Annual Meeting.
The message to employees:
As some associates may be aware, yesterday an activist shareholder, Land & Buildings Investment Management LLC, which only recently became a Forest City shareholder, issued a press release critical of the company’s board and management, and calling for the company to take a range of actions - beyond those that we have already taken or announced as part of our ongoing strategic transformation.
Associates are well aware of the many significant steps the company has taken - thanks to your hard work and dedication - over the last several years as we have executed on our strategy to focus on core markets and products, build a strong capital structure and pursue operational excellence. In addition, we have improved the transparency of our financial disclosure and enhanced our governance practices, including plans to eliminate our dual-class stock structure and appoint two new independent board members, effective with a shareholder vote at our 2017 Annual Meeting later this spring.
The broad range of our strategic and governance actions over the past several years have been favorably received by many investors, including a number of our largest and longest-tenured shareholders. For that reason, we were surprised that Land & Buildings would choose to take such a negative, and, we believe, counterproductive stance.
I want to assure associates that the entire board and senior leadership team believe the actions we have taken and continue to take as a company, have put Forest City on a positive growth path for the future that will continue to enhance value for all the company’s stakeholders, including associates.
While the Land & Buildings press release and any subsequent communication on this matter are likely to generate media coverage, I urge you not to let it be a distraction from the vital day-to-day work of continuing to execute our strategies, serve tenants and residents, and support fellow associates. We have a core team of senior staff and advisors focused on addressing this issue and will update the broader associate base if and when developments merit.
As always, thank you for your commitment to the continued success of Forest City.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…