Skip to main content

As Forest City presents affordable housing info on B2 at CB2/CB8, some details (few family-size units, estimated rents, modular troubles)

Update: there's also a presentation tonight at 6 pm before Community Board 2. See below left.

Brooklyn Community Board 8 holds its monthly General Meeting tomorrow at 7 pm at Calvary Community Church, 1575 St. John's Place (corner of Buffalo Avenue) and, as shown on the agenda, Forest City Ratner Companies will make a presentation on the affordable housing lottery at 461 Dean Street.

That's the long-delayed 32-story modular tower (aka B2) still under construction at the corner of Dean Street and Flatbush Avenue flanking the Barclays Center, and the lottery, which usually lasts two months, hasn't been announced yet. (Here's the HPD list of lotteries.)

However, given the significant paperwork, it pays to plan ahead.

Some details

While the details of the lottery haven't been released, let me share what we know so far. There will be 181 affordable units, and 181 market-rate units.

First, remember that "affordable housing" does not mean "low-income housing" but rather "income-linked housing," with households paying 30% of their income in rent. In the Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park plan, 50% of the rental units are supposed to be "affordable," with five "bands," two of them low-income, one moderate-income, and two middle-income.

The relative lack of affordability in the building was criticized in 2012 by BrooklynSpeaks and various coalition members. “By using up the available subsidies to finance smaller apartments for tenants in higher income brackets, FCRC is making it harder to build truly affordable units elsewhere in the City," said Michelle de la uz of the Fifth Avenue Committee.

Note that the charts below are based on 2012 Area Median Income (which itself includes some wealthy suburbs) of $83,000 for a family of four. Today, the most recently available AMI, according to the NYC HDC, is $86,300 for a four-person household. So add approximately 4% to the numbers.

The chart above, from Forest City, does not describe the configuration of units, however. The chart below, from New York City Housing Development Corporation, does show the configuration, and the rents, again as of 2012.


One thing to remember is that, while the affordable housing was promised as 50% family-sized units--in floor area, though that was often fudged as unit count--this building falls short.

Of the 181 affordable units, only 36, or 20%, are two-bedroom apartments. And those are not distributed evenly among the five affordable "bands." Rather, there are 10 low-income two-bedroom units, in the first two bands, 5 in the moderate-income "band," and 21 in the two middle-income bands, which themselves are not distributed evenly.

Instead, there are 16 units in the higher middle-income band--with rents estimated in 2012 at $2,740 and today likely closer to $2,850.

Why the configuration? Well, as I reported in 2012, the number of two-bedroom units was increased only under pressure from the city, which then acceded to Forest City Ratner's request that they be limited to the highest-income "affordable" cohort, thus generating higher rents.

So the building is 1) not so family friendly and 2) to the extent it does serve families, it skews toward higher-income ones. Note that the next two affordable buildings under construction do have a higher percentage of family-sized apartments--but also skew toward higher-income households.

Other things to consider

Also, note that, while the rest of the Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park project (excepting the Barclays Center) is now owned by the Greenland Forest City Partners joint venture, this building is owned solely by Forest City.

It's the first, and likely only, Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park tower built via cutting-/bleeding-edge modular construction, which was supposed to save time but instead has taken twice as long to construct.

As I reported, water damage, including mold, led to the gutting of several lower floors of the building--which completely went against the notion of delivering the modules as finished pieces of the tower.

Also, several exterior panels have flapped in the wind, and have required repair.

Some questions

What will the rents be?

Will the affordable and market-rate units be distributed evenly throughout the building?

Will the different bands of affordable units be distributed evenly throughout the building?

How is the building's integrity being guaranteed? By the Department of Buildings? An insurance company?

What will be the impact of the adjacent arena entrance and loading dock? How will building managers be able to coordinate and communicate with arena managers?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.