Skip to main content

In campaign, de Blasio touted affordable housing at $1,000-$1,500 a month; that's not the case with next Atlantic Yards towers

2014 AMI is actually lower, at $83.900, but AMI when the 
the buildings open surely will be higher; click to enlarge
Some 60% of the "affordable housing" in the next two "100% affordable" Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Brooklyn towers--which will be built in tandem with market-rate towers--will go to households earning $100,000 or more.

And Mayor Bill de Blasio said it was "exactly what we came here to do." So it's worth looking back at a campaign debate when the topic came up.

During the 10/22/13 debate between Democratic nominee de Blasio and Republican nominee Joe Lhota, the moderator, Maurice DuBois, asked, "You've both made it clear that you'd aggressively build affordable housing in our city. I'm curious, so, in a city where average income is around $50,000 a year, what should the rent be for a two-bedroom apartment?"

"Well, this is what I'd say about affordable housing," de Blasio responded. "We have to build--my plan is 200,000 units over the next ten years. And we achieve that with very strong requirements for developers that they have to create affordable housing if they want the opportunity--"

"--Sir, I'm looking for a number," DuBois interjected.




A $1,500 apartment and a sliding scale

"I'm getting there," de Blasio continued. "If they want an opportunity to build in this city, using our tax codes, opening up vacant land... There's a series of things we have to do... Look, I think what's happening in this city, 46% of people at or near the poverty level. For a lot of folks, annual income, 30, 40, 50,000 [dollars], so they need a rent that they could afford, might be in the 1,000 to 1,500 dollar a month range, for example."

"So, given that, would you force--" DuBois asked.

"--That's one example, we're obviously talking about a sliding scale, depending on income," de Blasio said.

It's not unreasonable to expect a sliding scale, and the Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park towers obviously represent that.

However, that sliding scale was supposed to be evenly distributed. For the next two towers, however, the upper-middle-income category gets half the affordable units, as opposed to 20%, as long promised.

Yet de Blasio said, "This is a symbol of what we intend to do with our affordable housing plan over and over and over and over."

Making it work, and what really happened

The moderator, rather than establishing that the sliding scale should be fairly distributed, instead spoke to the anxiety--real or not--expressed by developers.

"Would you force developers to build it," asked DuBois. "How can they make that work financially?"

"Because what we'd offer is opportunities that they can't have right now," de Blasio said. " The public sector controls the spigot of development. We would give opportunities to developers to developer areas they're not developing yet, to have the height and density to truly make it profitable."

de Blasio's contradictions

However, Atlantic Yards was already approved, and Forest City Ratner was obligated to start another tower by this month or pay penalties. Rather than hold the new Greenland Forest City Partners to that obligation, at the income ranges specified, de Blasio allowed the skewing of those ranges but still claimed "affordable housing."

"But we'd say the only way you get to develop is if you give us enough affordable housing and, with enough mix of income levels covered, to actually represent what's going on in the city today," de Blasio continued.

Does six-figure affordable housing "represent what's going on in the city today"? The need is greatest among those with lower incomes.

"We have the power in New York City to do that, to require that," de Blasio said in closing. "Mayor Bloomberg wouldn't do that. He was lenient toward the real estate industry. He had many situations where they promised to create affordable housing, but they didn't follow through on the promise. I would make it a requirement."

de Blasio too has been lenient, just in different ways.

Doing the math

When Lhota got his chance, he said, "Somewhere between $750 and $1250 for someone that's making $50,000 a year."

If we assume that a household in affordable housing pays 30% of their income in rent, then that works out to $1,250 a month.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…