Skip to main content

Before Quality of Life meeting, partial disclosure of changes, plans, but omissions re rent levels, condemnation, B2 troubles

At tonight's Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Quality of Life meeting--not quite a Committee any more, apparently-- Forest City Ratner will make a presentation (bottom) regarding the updated housing plan and upcoming construction activities. The meeting will be at 6 pm at the YWCA Community Room, 30 Third Avenue at Atlantic Avenue.

The document summarizes, among other things, previously announced plans to construct two all-affordable buildings and complete the project by 2025, plans to build a green roof on the arena and the railyard's west portal, plans to set up a new Atlantic Yards Community Development Corporation to oversee the project, and (misleading) renderings of the first tower, at Carlton Avenue and Dean Street.

Click to enlarge
New is a slide (right) slides showing changes in logistics activity on Block 1129, the southeast block of the project, given the demolition of the one remaining building, and a shrunken amount of surface parking: 265 spaces during demolition.

The document mentions the new name Pacific Park and the joint venture with Greenland USA, the arm of the Chinese government-owned Greenland Group, which has bought a 70% interest in the project going forward. But it's unclear whether anyone from Greenland will be there or be part of the presentation.

What are the gaps?

There are some significant gaps in the document, however, regarding the project. They include:
  • the expected rent levels for affordable housing (the document just addresses eligibility by income)
  • the ongoing effort to condemn the remaining buildings in the project site that are privately owned
  • the huge turmoil, including dueling lawsuits, over the much-hyped modular construction plan.
Also, as described below, the slide regarding the income eligibility for the next three buildings is misleading.

How much will rent be?

The one slide regarding affordability shows the income ranges for the upcoming affordable units, as a percentage of Area Median Income (AMI) but, crucially, not the rent levels.


So I made my own chart for the next two towers (not 461 Dean/B2), based on the New York City Housing Development Corporation (NYC HDC) term sheet for Bands 1-4, and HDC confirmation to me regarding Band 5. I'm not clear whether the HDC figures for low-income Bands 1 and 2 are adjusted to the actual rent--37% of AMI, not 40%, and 57%, not 60%), so those numbers might go down slightly.
Projected rents for two all-affordable Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park towers
What's crucial, of course, is that half the units in the next two towers--I've excluded the under-construction B2--would go to middle-income households paying nearly $3,000 for a two-bedroom apartment. That distribution differs significantly from the longtime promises regarding the project, as I wrote in a long article for BKLYNR.

A misleading slide (updated)

From Forest City Ratner, 2014
That first slide, also reproduced at right, is somewhat misleading and should have had a footnote.

It seems to describes the current income eligibility for the next three Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park buildings that will contain affordable housing.

Those income ranges in each band, as well as the level at which rents are set, are correct for the upcoming buildings, at 545 Carlton and 30 6th Avenue, as per NYC HDC documents.

However, there are discrepancies regarding the bands outlined in blue as they relate to the first tower--B2, or 461 Dean Street--since income eligibility should have some lower bounds, and rents should be slightly lower.

From Forest City Ratner, 2012
If you look at the graphic at left, from Forest City's own 2012 presentation about B2 and the one below right, from a NYC HDC letter regarding that tower, there are multiple differences.

Those eligible for Band 2 can earn up to 50% AMI, not 60%, and have a lower target rent, 48% of AMI, not 57% of AMI.

Similarly, Band 4 maxes at 140% of AMI, not 145%, and has a lower target rent, 120% of AMI, not 130%. And Band 5 maxes at 160% or AMI, not 165%, and has a lower target rent, 150% of AMI, not 160%.

Trying to make sense of it

From NYC Housing Development Corporation, 2012
Those earlier guidelines regarding B2 do stand, I am told this morning, so the chart at top needs correction.

Either Forest City was just being sloppy, or it didn't want to call attention to the fact that the rents for the next two towers would be higher--and the units less affordable--than in the first tower.

Yesterday, I tried to learn more. I queried ESD, which had forwarded the presentation. They told me I should try Forest City and HDC.

I queried Forest City, and got no response. I didn't query HDC, because I know what their documents say. This morning I got clarification from Forest City that the B2 bands do remain.

What rent difference means

Note, for example, the discrepancy between the chart below, prepared by Forest City Ratner in 2012, and the chart I prepared. For Band 2, the higher of the two low-income bands, a one-bedroom would cost $689. But that was set at 48% of AMI, not 57%. At the latter figure, a one-bedroom would cost $847.
From Forest City Ratner, 2012

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.