Skip to main content

On night Ratner/Gilmartin get Onassis Medal, "appalled" Historic Districts Council plans showing of film, panel discussion (including me)

The news that the Municipal Art Society (MAS) is giving its highest honor, the Jaqueline Kennedy Onassis Medal, to Forest City Ratner's Bruce Ratner and MaryAnne Gilmartin does not sit well with the Historic Districts Council, a group that, unlike MAS, is focused specifically on preservation.

It announced that it's "appalled" and has scheduled a counter-event--a showing of the Atlantic Yards documentary Battle for Brooklyn and a panel discussion (including me)--on the same night, June 11. More details below.

Defense and criticism

From coverage in Capital New York:
Margaret Newman, M.A.S. executive director, defended the organization's honoring of Ratner and Gilmartin.
"M.A.S. is honoring Forest City Ratner Companies for their extensive body of work, their ongoing vision, as well as for their commitment to the future of New York," she said. "FCRC's focus on addressing our city’s lack of affordable housing through innovative investments in modular building techniques will have a positive and lasting impact, and serve as a model for the entire development sector. Forest City Ratner’s acute understanding of the ways that mixed-use development and urban revitalization projects contribute to the healthy and sustainable functioning of communities across the region and the country has benefited cities – and citizens – from coast to coast.
She also argued that "FCRC has led the revitalization of a key part of New York, Downtown Brooklyn, starting with MetroTech Center and culminating with our city's first 21st century arena, entertainment complex and neighborhood catalyst: Barclays Center."
Forest City Ratner had no comment.
But Ron Shiffman, a Pratt Institute professor, Atlantic Yards critic and a recipient of the Jane Jacobs Medal, which is administered by M.A.S., argued that the nonprofit's pursuit of money was clouding its judgment.
“It says that they needed money,” said Shiffman. “But there’s a point at which principle has to trump need when it comes to these kinds of things.”
Well, Forest City can be honored for its buildings, but, as I've previously explained, you have to ignore how they got there: the end justifies the means. 

Consider how Gilmartin claimed Atlantic Yards represented "massive blight," while the New York Court of Appeals dubbed it "relatively mild conditions of urban blight principally attributable to a large and, of course, uninhabited subgrade rail cut"--which, I might add, looks to be developed last in the construction sequence.

More reasons for skepticism

The modular citation is unfortunately timed: MAS made the decision to give the award before learning that the first tower would be delayed a year, until December 2015, and that Forest City Ratner's new joint venture partner/overseer, the Chinese government-owned Greenland Group, would decide that the next three towers would be built through conventional construction.

Also, the salute to affordable housing must be contextualized by a recognition of how hard Forest City sold such benefits to the public but kept delaying it.

It's not committed to affordable housing. It's committed to making the profit it needs, and affordable housing happened to fit. If Forest City were truly committed to affordable housing, it would have lobbied for tax reform and other public policies.

The headline in the Capital New York article is Ratner award sparks intra-preservationist fight, but the MAS, which has a preservation component, is not as focused on preservation as the HDC.

As I wrote, Forest City's record doesn't necessarily fit with the Municipal Art Society's efforts to create a "more livable city by advocating for excellence in urban planning and design, a commitment to historic preservation and the arts, and the empowerment of local communities to affect change in their neighborhoods."

While the signature Forest City buildings honored in the invitation--the Barclays Center, the New York Times Tower, New York By Gehry--arguably represent excellent urban design (if not urban planning), it's hard to say they represent a commitment to historic preservation nor the empowerment of local communities.

The relevance of Battle for Brooklyn

The film, which ends as the arena is being constructed, can't tell the full or up-to-date story. But it's still valuable.

As I wrote in my review, "Having observed much of the story in real time, I found Battle most valuable in the camera’s witness to the palpable insincerity and cold-blooded indifference of the developer-government alliance."

That's still true. And I don't think Jackie Onassis would have liked it.

Thing is, Forest City has embraced historic preservation when it met their financial goals. In the case of Atlantic Yards, they ignored it. Originally, they didn't plan to build on the southeast block of the project site, a block that could have been restored. Then they decided it was financially necessary.

The announcement
Historic Districts Council is appalled that Forest City Ratner is being awarded the Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis Medal‏
New York- The Historic Districts Council, the citywide advocate for New York's historic neighborhoods, will present the film Battle for Brooklyn (2011) followed by a panel discussion with planning experts and community advocates on the ongoing community concerns related to the Atlantic Yards Project on June 11, 2014 at 6 PM at the Brooklyn Lyceum, 227 4th Avenue, Brooklyn. This event will take place on the same evening that Bruce Ratner and MaryAnne Gilmartin of Forest City Ratner, developers of Atlantic Yards, will be honored by the Municipal Art Society with the Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis Medal for their contributions to New York City.
As an organization devoted to preserving New York City’s physical character, HDC is appalled by the decision to honor what Forest City Ratner has done to our city. Conflating the company’s record of bulldozing neighborhoods with Mrs. Onassis’s pivotal role in preserving New York City’s Landmarks Law is something HDC feels should not go unnoticed. We thought about screening the film directly on to the side of the building where the award is being presented to demonstrate how FCR treats New York City’s neighborhoods, but decided instead to use this opportunity to host a conversation about communities, development and the future of the area in and around downtown Brooklyn.
The panel speakers include Michelle de la Uz, Executive Director of the Fifth Avenue Committee; Daniel Goldstein, Co-founder of Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn; Norman Oder, Journalist, Atlantic Yards Report and Ronald Shiffman, Pratt professor. The event is free and open to the public, but RSVPs are required and space is limited. For further information please contact bharmon@hdc.org or 212-614-9107.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…