Skip to main content

Evaluating the arena transportation plan based on AY Watch's list of questions: lots of unknowns remain (hence push for more in Neighborhood Protection Plan)

Today, at a press conference, community groups involved in Atlantic Yards Watch (Prospect Heights Neighborhood Development Council, the Park Slope Civic Council, and the Boerum Hill Association) will, along with local elected officials, unveil the Neighborhood Protection Plan.

The goal? Address issues ignored by Forest City Ratner in its release of the draft Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan, as well as other arena-related issues not yet addressed.

I've already pointed out unresolved issues in the TDM plan and would remind readers that the issue that's generated the greatest concern is the protection of residential streets from those seeking free on-street parking.

But let me evaluate it based on the list of questions posed by Atlantic Yards Watch before its release. Below, I've reproduced the meat of the questions, with my scorecard in italics. Lots of questions remain unresolved.

Text below from Atlantic Yards Watch. Text in italics from AYR.

Extent of TDM

1. Does the TDM program apply to all arena events at all times of day? No. Only "large" events, and clearly not small events drawing under 5,000 people. But it's unclear what the cut-off for "large is: 8.000? 10,000? 12,000? 15,000?
The required TDM only covers Nets Games, (less than 20% of the 225 projected arena events), and the HOV requirement is in effect only after 5 PM. What is FCRC doing to implement an effective TDM Program for all Barclays Center events? It will go beyond Nets games, but not clear how far.
Why should the HOV requirement not also apply to daytime events, especially on Saturdays and Sundays? There was no discussion of the timeframe. Presumably when the draft is revised this will be discussed.

Performance goals

2. Setting of real performance goals.
What goals has FCRC established for the percentage of arena patrons who will (a) use private vehicles or taxis to get to Barclays Center and (b) use satellite parking lots? There are goals for number of drivers, though not necessarily broken down in this form. The satellite parking lots will have at least 612 spaces. Presumably we will get reports on use percentage.
How does the TDM address taxi usage? So far all we know is that post-event taxis will queue on the north side of Atlantic Avenue. We don't even know how many spaces there would be and what kind of back-up it would cause.
How does the TDM deal with displacement of vehicles beyond the 1/2 mile radius to parking garages in downtown Brooklyn, potentially resulting in congestion in that area while not reducing the number of vehicles on the Brooklyn and Manhattan bridges, the BQE, or north Flatbush Avenue. This was not addressed in the draft plan.


Parking

3. Parking controlled by FCRC.
What are the opening and closing times for Block 1129 [onsite, bounded by Dean and Pacific streets and Carlton and Vanderbilt avenues] parking and the satellite lots? This was not mentioned.
What are the plans for the Block 1129 lot: access/egress routes, location of curb cuts, landscaping, screening etc? The main access/egress would be (privatized) Pacific Street, with secondary access/egress along residential Dean Street, and egress on Vanderbilt Avenue. The exterior will be landscaped and screened, but the interior will not be landscaped. The parking lot, officials say, need not conform to city landscaping regulations.
Will the number of HOV reserved spaces, an incentive to carpool, be reduced? Unclear. They have been reduced onsite, and relocated to off-site garages.
What type of users (such as HOV and VIP) will have access to the Block 1129 parking spaces? Not quite clear. VIP users, including 150 spaces reserved for suiteholders, will have access to Block 1129. It seems like HOV users will not have access.
Will they all be pre-reserved to eliminate queuing upon entering? Yes.
What measures will be in place on the lot to prevent queuing on adjacent residential streets? Beyond reservations and pre-payment, it's not clear what other measures are contemplated. Stay tuned.
What type of users have been displaced from Block 1129 parking and where are they going to park? Not clear, but some contractors may have been using the lot.

Local streets

4. Protection of local streets.
Bruce Ratner recently announced 800 employees may work some events. How many are expected to drive to work and where will they park? They are expected to take public transit.
Will FCRC, ESDC and NYC DOT support establishment of an arena parking tax surcharge, with the tax revenues flowing to The City of New York? No one brought this up.
What will FCRC, ESDC and NYCDOT do to restrict arena patrons from parking on residential and commercial streets near the arena? Nothing beyond exhorting people not to drive.
Will FCRC, ESDC and NYC DOT support the creation of a Residential Parking Permit program in the neighborhoods near the arena? Forest City and ESDC stayed away from this, which is blocked in the legislature by Southern Brooklyn legislators like state Sen. Marty Golden, an Atlantic Yards supporter. NYC DOT is still studying the issue.

Follow-up: monitoring and enforcement

5. On-going monitoring and enforcement.
Will FCRC monitor and report on its TDM activities at least annually? There are two studies in the first year. After that, unclear.
Will ESDC require that FCRC establish on-going performance goals? Not yet.
Will ESDC require TDM evaluation and adjustments on an ongoing basis? So far, there will be an evaluation in the first year.
Will ESDC impose penalties for the failure to meet goals? No mention of this yet.

Follow-up: data collection

6. Stronger data collection.
Will FCRC agree to additional data collection [beyond Nets fans] including but not limited to: the number of cars parking on local streets; the level of service at intersections, crosswalks and sidewalks; the number of riders on transit; and number of users of satellite parking lots? No mention of this yet.

Transit incentives

7. Effective transit incentives.
What is FCRC doing to “bundle” free transit fares with arena tickets so that the transit swipes are not available to persons other than arena ticketholders and not available except for travel to and from the ticketed event? This was dropped as not feasible and also not effective. However, it would save Forest City Ratner $2 million to $3 million a year.
What discounts will be extended to LIRR and Metro-North fares? Nothing mentioned.
What transit and commuter rail service enhancements are being implemented? Increased subways after events, as well as more frequent LIRR trains after events.
Will LIRR operate trains out of Atlantic Terminal after 12 midnight? If needed, though that's not yet planned.
Who is paying for the transit incentives? The public agencies, apparently. One big question is whether this is a net cost to the public or not. Forest City consultant Sam Schwartz suggested it might not be. The public agencies were silent. Given that many if not most of the attendees will have unlimited ride MetroCards, transit access adds no net cost. Perhaps Brooklyn Assemblyman Jim Brennan, who chairs the Corporations Committee, could look into this.


Shuttles and buses

8. Utilization of shuttle and other buses.
The MEC requires FCRC to establish at least 500 parking spaces near the Atlantic Avenue/BQE interchange and 2 park-and-ride lots in Staten Island.
Where will these or other remote lots being established? Along Atlantic Avenue. The Staten Island lots were dropped as not feasible, given that it would be tough for attendees to return to the lots during the event if they had to leave early.
Will these operate for all events? Not clear.
How many shuttle and other buses will be arriving on the arena block in the pre and post event hour? Not clear.
Where are the bus drop-off and pick-up locations on the arena block? Along Atlantic Avenue.
Where will shuttle buses and other buses be parked during events? Not certain, but possibly in Red Hook, or along Pacific Street next to the parking lot.

Bike access

9. Bicycle incentives.
Why should FCRC not establish an attended, covered bike parking facility on the arena block? There will be a facility that is attended during Nets games. It won't be covered. Presumably a tent would not be costly.
Will security personnel monitor the outdoor bike parking FCRC is proposing? Will security coverage apply to all events? Yes for Nets games and perhaps other large events.
How will FCRC protect cyclists who are riding adjacent to the Dean Street lay-by lane? Unclear.
What is the recommended north/south route to the bicycle parking area? Unclear.

Cross-marketing

10. Cross-marketing plan.
The MEC requires FCRC to develop a plan to "cross-market with area businesses to encourage ticketholders to patronize local restaurants and stores before and after games.” However, cross-marketing efforts might induce people to drive to the arena if they end up arriving or leaving the neighborhood when shuttle buses are not running or public transit is less frequent at night.
What is the scope of the cross-marketing plan with respect to its geographic range and time frame? Unclear. The plan is under development.
How will the planners ensure that cross-marketing efforts don't undermine other TDM measures - such as the use of transit, shuttles or satellite parking? Unclear. The plan is under development.
How will marketing opportunities be priced to ensure that a wide array of businesses are included? Unclear. The plan is under development.
Will additional shuttle or public transit service be provided along Flatbush and Atlantic Avenues in the post-event hours? The MTA can add buses if necessary, but says it does not yet see the need.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.