Skip to main content

Fact-checking claims in MaryAnne Gilmartin's "The Op-Ed: Atlantic Yards—It Is Happening"

Hold on--did the New York Observer really publish The Op-Ed: Atlantic Yards—It Is Happening, by Forest City Ratner Executive VP MaryAnne Gilmartin?

Well, yes--and no. Her self-serving essay appeared in the Commercial Observer, a spinoff weekly aimed at the commercial real estate market, which started up last September.

The Commercial Observer is delivered free to approximately 10,000 commercial real estate insiders and members of REBNY (Real Estate Board of New York). Maybe that's why Gilmartin's byline also describes her as "an active member of the Real Estate Board of New York."

In other words, Gilmartin was talking to peers.

The missing timetable

I'll go through her essay below, but first recognize one contrast between Atlantic Yards—It Is Happening and Bruce Ratner's May 2008 Daily News op-ed headlined Atlantic Yards dead? Dream on.

Ratner claimed that the developer aimed to break ground on the Barclays Center later that year, and open both the arena and the first residential tower in 2010. "We anticipate finishing all of Atlantic Yards by 2018," he wrote.

Gilmartin offers no timetables, no prediction of how long interim surface parking might linger.

Nor does she mention that the Development Agreement signed with the Empire State Development Corporation gives them 25 years to complete a much smaller project than approved.

Leading off

Her op-ed begins:
The recession, the credit crunch and the inherent difficulty of building in the most densely settled city in America: These are just a few of the challenges that have dogged the Atlantic Yards project since its announcement, in December 2003.
This is a bit of a dodge. The recession and credit crunch hardly dogged the Atlantic Yards project in December 2003.

And the "inherent difficulty of building in the most densely settled city in America," while undeniable, shouldn't be seen in a vacuum. Forest City Ratner and its government partners agreed to avoid the city's Uniform Land Use Review Procedure, which would have conveyed more legitimacy and staved off some community opposition.

Moreover, that phrasing distracts from an alternative view: "the densest residential community in the United States" if built as approved, according to planner (and DDDB board member) Ron Shiffman.

"Litigious opponents"

Gilmartin continues:
Add to these general obstacles a small group of litigious opponents who vowed to sue early and often to stop the project, and the six-year project inception period makes more sense.
As DDDB's Daniel Goldstein commented, the organization "never vowed anything like that."

Moreover, the "mend-it-don't-end-it" BrooklynSpeaks, which AY booster Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz in December 2008 said were "reasonable people" with "some valid, viable ideas," last November finally changed policy and went to court.

What they're building

Gilmartin continues:
But the wait is over. We are building Atlantic Yards. And the project is more important than ever.
What exactly is the "Atlantic Yards" that they're building. There are no renderings, just "vaportecture." She doesn't mention that they have three or four years after the delivery of property via eminent domain to start building the first tower and 12 years to build Phase 1.

And while Forest City has proceeded as if there are no remaining potential snags--and it's a good bet they and the ESDC will prevail--the fact is that the condemnation remains on hold. It's quite possible that Gilmartin's op-ed was submitted under the presumption that title would pass on January 29.

What's AY about?

Gilmartin continues:
From the beginning, Atlantic Yards has been about much more than building a basketball arena. It has been about jobs and housing and an historic community-benefits agreement that ensures that the project's economic and social benefits help the folks who live here and need it most. Even during booming economic times, Brooklyn as a borough has seen unequal resources and opportunities; it is a place where good jobs and affordable housing could make a genuine difference. Now, as the economy stumbles out of the worst recession in decades, they are more necessary than ever.

The Harsh Reality

Unemployment in the borough is over 10 percent, compared to 5.7 percent just two years earlier. Each week, more than 100 people show up at the office of BUILD, a downtown Brooklyn-based job training organization, looking for jobs. Since 2004, nearly 7,000 have completed registry forms at this one organization alone. Last year, BUILD provided more than 1,200 local residents with job training or some type of employment support.
A project as big as Atlantic Yards surely would have some share-the-wealth impacts in Brooklyn, but it's not a charitable endeavor.

Forest City Ratner's funding of BUILD helps people get job training, but that funding is made possible--indirectly--by significant government subsidies to the developer. Forest City Ratner just got another $31 million in cash for property acquisition. That frees up a lot of money for the questionable CBA.

Why not provide public funding directly to job training organizations--ones that do not supply cheerleaders for the developer?

Affordable housing

Gilmartin continues:
Affordable housing in the city remains scarce. Over a quarter of a million families are on waiting lists for Section 8 vouchers or public housing, a number that does not include the many cops, nurses, firemen, medical technicians and teachers who need moderate- and middle-income housing to afford to live in the city where they work.
Only about half the 2250 subsidized units--or 1125--would be affordable to people seeking Section 8 vouchers or public housing (80% of Area Median Income or lower) and the first, building, at least, might far fewer such units.

If Atlantic Yards takes 25 years to build--and it could go longer, with eight opportunities to get one-year Affordable Housing Subsidy Unavailability extensions--that's 90 affordable units a year, with 45 a year for those quarter of a million families on waiting lists.

In other words, it can't make much of a dent. even if built in 15 years, the numbers are 150 and 75.

The question of blight

Gilmartin continues:
For decades, the area surrounding and encompassing Atlantic Yards has remained a blighted part of the city. It has failed to attract the investment seen in other parts of the city and the borough.
Then why does Chuck Ratner, CEO of parent Forest City Enterprises, call it "a great piece of real estate"?

Why was there never any attempt to market the Vanderbilt Yard, which almost surely would have generated multiple bids, as with Willets Point or Hudson Yards?

Why are there million-dollar condos next door? Wouldn't a historic district literally adjacent to the site invite investment? There were spot rezonings for buildings like the Newswalk condos, but never a rezoning that would spur investment.

What about the cappuccino nearly next door?

About the site

Gilmartin continues:
While opponents have depicted the 22-acre site as an oasis of brownstones and quaint streets, those who live or work in the area, or who have traveled to the site, know that while a few commercial businesses and residents have made the site their home, in 2006, more than 70 percent of the project area was occupied by empty lots, gas stations, underutilized or vacant manufacturing buildings and an 8-acre, below-grade LIRR rail yard, which since the early 1900s has divided the communities to the north and south of the site.
No one's depicted it as an oasis--it's a borderland, with valuable land. And, by 2006, three years after Forest City Ratner announced the project, investment had been stalled.

The future

Gilmartin continues:
Looking to the Future

To those who wonder if the project will happen, we encourage a closer look. It is happening. Our commitment to the entire project remains as strong and fervent as the day we started.
Really? Architect Frank Gehry is gone, as is landscape architect Laurie Olin. There are no renderings of anything except the arena.

The Nets have been essentially dismantled in order to clear cap space for free agents and to hope for the first lottery pick in the draft; the three players used to sell the project--Jason Kidd, Richard Jefferson, and Vince Carter--have all been jettisoned.

Work on the site

Gilmartin continues:
Work on Atlantic Yards has been ongoing since last summer. Nearly $90 million worth of work has already been awarded to contractors on the site thus far.
Yes, the developer has pursued utility work, demolitions, and a temporary railyard. Meanwhile, it's gotten the state and city to speed up subsidy payments and renegotiated the Vanderbilt Yard deal with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, putting down $20 million instead of the original $100 million pledged.

Estimates of jobs

Gilmartin pretends that Forest City Ratner is some kind of charity:
Still, it is the jobs and the housing that matter most, all the more now with double-digit unemployment and a painful affordable housing crunch. Atlantic Yards will create 17,000 construction jobs and up to 8,000 permanent jobs when completed.
Construction jobs are expressed in job-years, so that would be 1700 jobs a year over ten years, or perhaps 680 jobs a year over 25 years.

Yesterday, I dissected the incredible claim of 8000 permanent jobs. Forest City, perhaps chastened by the inquiries from the Washington Post, now claims "up to 8,000 permanent jobs," which leaves an enormous amount of wiggle room.

Phase 1 affordable housing

Gilmartin continues:
The first phase of the project, which starts with the Barclays Center Arena, will also provide approximately 1,500 residential units on the arena block, at least 30 percent of them affordable. Once completed, half of the 4,500 rental units will be available for low-income and working families.
Let's assume that it takes 12 years. That would mean 37.5 affordable units a year. And most of those units would be unaffordable to members and supporters of ACORN, which signed the Atlantic Yards Affordable Housing Memorandum of Understanding.
Gilmartin refers to "low-income and working families." But she strenuously avoids explaining that, even as early as July 2006, those seeking subsidized housing at the project were shocked that so many of the apartments would be unaffordable to them. A good chunk would be at or above market.

Just an arena?

Gilmartin continues:
Opponents' charges that we will end up building only an arena are false. No developer would sustain and ultimately agree to undertake a project like this with significant pre-development expenses, costly delays and well-defined future penalties and then build only an arena.
That's a straw man. Yes, some people say they'll just build an arena, but even ESDC documents indicate a scenario with an arena and at least one tower before the potential of a delayed buildout. Should subsidies become available, FCR would undoubtedly build more.

The future penalties may be well-defined, but they're hardly onerous. The damages Forest City Ratner faces in most cases--less than $10 million for an arena that's up to three years late, $5 million for each of three buildings if they're late--don't represent a lot of money.

Note that the Development Agreement explicitly states that the damages are not designed to be penalties.


Gilmartin continues:
Forest City Ratner Companies and its partners have invested upward of $500 million in the entire Atlantic Yards program since we announced the project. And millions more will be invested going forward.
Yes, depending on the availability of scarce housing subsidies.

Public costs

Gilmartin continues:
While Atlantic Yards is a public-private partnership, the arena's share of public funds is a fraction of that received by other sports facilities. Direct public investments in the Atlantic Yards project, inclusive of the arena, add up to just over 5 percent of the anticipated cost.
Well, there are a lot of sweet deals out there, but consider that the arena's questionable tax exemption got grandfathered in by the Treasury Department.

No one's conducted a full cost-benefit analysis of the project, but the New York City Independent Budget Office--the least partisan of any organization to take a look--concluded that the arena would be a significant net loss to the city.

The need for agility

In closing, Gilmartin writes:
Development requires agility, the willingness and ability to respond to a changing environment. On Atlantic Yards, we've done that. We've been appropriately nimble, making necessary adjustments in light of changing markets and demands.
Is that a euphemism for dropping Gehry and indefinitely delaying the office building that would provide the builk of the new tax revenues claimed for the project?

She concludes:
But we've done so without abandoning our principles or our commitment to the public good we and others expect from the project.
Principles? As I wrote yesterday, under the heading "Integrity and Openness" (among Core Values), Forest City Enterprises states:
In all our dealings with all stakeholders, we will uphold the highest possible standards of ethical behavior. Our interactions will be characterized by an attitude of openness, candor and honesty.

Don't those values come into conflict with self-serving op-ed pieces aimed at the Real Estate Board of New York?


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…