Skip to main content

Who's responsible for painting over those anti-AY murals? Patti Hagan suspects Forest City Ratner (but there's no direct evidence)

For years there were murals on the east side of Carlton Avenue between Dean Street and Pacific Street, painted by Patti Hagan and Schellie Hagan of the Prospect Heights Action Coalition (PHAC), on property owned by Henry Weinstein, who has resisted selling his building and adjacent lots to Forest City Ratner.

(Update 1/22/09: not all the property is owned by Weinstein; about half is owned by Forest City Ratner.)

(Photo by Tracy Collins)

It's gone now and, after eliminating governmental entities in charge of graffiti removal suspects, Patti Hagan suspects Forest City Ratner, though with no direct evidence. (Photo by Collins.)

I think it's certainly plausible that the mural was painted over by project supporters, but I also think that FCR would be savvy enough to keep its distance. (I haven't had a chance to ask about it, but FCR doesn't answer my questions, anyway.)

Hagan also thinks the removal was tied to the October visit to New York by prospective Nets owner Mikhail Prokhorov. She thinks Prokhorov would have come to Brooklyn. However, given that there were no media reports of such a visit, I think it's more likely some of his associates visited the AY footprint.

What happened?

Below is a lightly edited email from Hagan.

One day in the first week of October 2009, two neighbors, who'd been walking around the 'hood, phoned to ask why the PHAC Wall Murals ["NO EMINENT DOMAIN ABUSE,""ATLANTIC YARDS 'R' BELLY UP," "GEHRY THY NAME IS EMINENT DOMAIN," "SU CASA ES BRUCE CASA," "WE'RE TAKIN' 'EM ALL -- BRUCE 'N FRANK," plus the masked-rat stencils wielding wirecutters] that my sister, Schellie, and I had painted on Henry Weinstein's Carlton Avenue walls beginning 5 1/2 years ago -- had been painted out, greyed-out...except for the big OBAMA mural at the corner of Dean. I've been sleuthing out this Who Dun It? for almost 3 months now -- and, by a process of elimination, I am left with my original suspect: Bruce Ratner.

On October 14th I ran into Bill Murphy, sole occupant of the just re-opened Ratlantic Yards Community Liaison Office (so-called). Murphy told me that he strolls the Ratner footprint every day. I asked him if he knew anything about the obliteration of the Wall Murals. He said that, on the afternoon of Friday, October 2, he had observed "a nondescript white male @ 40 with a can of grey paint." (Three other neighbors all remembered seeing this guy, but did not talk to him. They did say he was wearing chinos and a button down shirt -- and did not look anything like a guy who painted for a living -- but like a guy who'd been sent over from Ratner HQ at 1 MetroTech.)

At the time, in October, I guessed that Ratner had called Marty Markowitz to dispatch his Anti-Graffiti squad to grey-out our offending Community Message Murals, as Ratner was about to tour his Russian Oligarch, Mikhail Prokhorov, around the AY site. (After which Prokhorov treated a few comrades to a $19,000 lunch at Nello's.)

It had taken me & Schellie, at different times since 2004 -- about 2 weeks, solid, to paint the Weinstein Wall Murals. (We had re-painted several sections, over earlier anti-Ratnerisms that had read: "RATNER: HANDS OFF OUR HOMES!" and "GEHRY FLUNKS M.I.T.") Nobody had messed with them, ever, in 5 1/2 years.

I tried to find out which government agency might have acted on a Ratner "ask" and executed a signed "Graffiti Free NYC Waiver for Free Graffiti Removal." (The "consent to enter & release of liability" form begins: "Step 1: Read & Sign. As the Property Owner ... I grant consent...") On November 9, I went to Borough Hall and met with Tonya M. Hill (Deputy Director of Community Service Center), who is in charge of Borough President Marty Markowitz's two-truck Graffiti Removal squad. She could find no Owner Waiver for Free Graffiti Removal. She suggested that the Mayor's Graffiti Removal people might have done the job, or the NYPD's 77th Precinct -- and offered to check with those offices.

On November 9 Henry Weinstein e-mailed me. "I have not authorized anyone to remove The Community Messages that Schellie and you worked so hard to create. This was so much more than a community message. The No Eminent Domain Abuse slogan painted on the roll down gate has been published and distributed in newspapers, magazines and TV both in the United States and Internationally. It is a violation of Our Constitutional Rights to Free Speech. It is so offensive that it has been obliterated, for the sake of some Russian Oligarch and his cronies not being offended. It is a disgrace."

On November 16 I wrote Ms. Hill to thank her [and point out that] Mr. Weinstein's authorization for these Murals has been on file with the NYPD 77th Precinct for 5 1/2 years. What was done to Mr. Weinstein's Mural Wall was not "Graffiti Removal" -- it was unauthorized "Community Message Removal." Vandalism.

On December 2 Tonya Hill e-mailed me: "I heard back from my contact person at the Mayor's Office (Jamarah Harris). She indicated that she has reached out to the Precinct and they also were not responsible for removing the graffiti. Again, she reiterated that the city did not have any waivers to remove the graffiti nor did my office. Unfortunately, there is nothing else we can do because we checked with all parties who could have removed it."

By coincidence, at a party two days later, I met Harris (Director of Policy & Initiatives, Community Affairs Unit, Office of the Mayor). She told me that after finding nothing in her files, she sent two people out to the site to double check. The Mayor's Graffiti Removers had never been near the Carlton Avenue Wall.

After eliminating Ratner-operating-through-Marty, Ratner-operating-through-Bloomberg, Ratner-operating-through-NYPD: all clues point to Ratner [FCR] himself. I suspect that Ratner dispatched the nondescript white guy in chinos from MetroTech, to paint out our Ratlantic Yards-hostile Community Message Murals so that his Russian Oligarch, Prokhorov, on his mid-October site visit, would not find evidence that the Prospect Heights natives are not friendly.

PS. Immediately after we had painted the Wall Murals -- Henry Weinstein was visited by two emissaries from Forest City Ratner. They were intent on painting-out our murals. The men said "They make Mr. Ratner uncomfortable. We want to paint them over." Henry said "No! Over my dead body!" That being the case, I would imagine Ratner has been irritated by the murals and itching to wipe them out the past 5 1/2 years.

The Photoshop version, by Collins, adding the new arena architects


  1. Since all project opponents are painted with a broad brush (pun intended) then clearly whoever did this was Forest City Ratner.

    And whoever did it was trespassing. As usual Forest City Ratner has no respect whatsoever for private property, unless, of course it is their's.

  2. So, when do we paint over it? And do you need any help?


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…