Skip to main content

Updated again: Is the city kicking in an extra $31 million for property acquisition? Yes

Update: "The $131 million referenced is part of the total original commitment (not new money) and will go to FCR for site acquisition and infrastructure work," says New York City Economic Development Corporation spokesman David Lombino.

Updated 1/25/10: It's all for land.

The below was written earlier on 12/4/09.

Has New York City contributed an additional $31 million subsidy for Atlantic Yards land? While I haven't been able to get an answer from city or state officials, language in bond documents is ambiguous but suggests that conclusion.

According to the Barclays Center Preliminary Official Statement (p. 563) prepared by Goldman Sachs:
City Capital Contribution – The City will make a capital contribution to the project through the appropriation of City funds from the City’s fiscal budget, totaling approximately $131 million, for certain costs incurred and to be incurred in connection with acquisition of the Premises by ESDC [Empire State Development Corporation].
For the acquisition of project land, the city has allocated $100 million, not $131 million. See for example the ESDC's 2009 Modified General Project Plan:
The City is also expected to fund $100 million of Project costs. City funds may be used for infrastructure improvements and for site acquisition costs related to the Project Site (other than for the acquisition of properties owned by the MTA/LIRR).
In other words, while the city has also allocated $105 million for infrastructure, it does not look like that any of that is being used for land acquisition.

More on the $131 million

The Official Statement refers to the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). It also makes a distinction between the initial $100 million, of which $15 million remains to be disbursed, and the additional $31 million. Only the former is subject to the City Funding Agreement.
The City’s capital contribution for the Arena Project, in the aggregate amount of $131 million, will be made available to NYCEDC for transfer to ESDC and disbursement to the Developer upon the satisfaction of certain conditions. As of the date of this Official Statement, NYCEDC has disbursed approximately $85 million of the City Funding Portion, which amount has been disbursed to the Developer by ESDC. The funding and disbursement of the remaining City Funding Portion is subject to the satisfaction of certain requirements which include, without limitation, satisfying eligibility requirements for the types of expenditures requested for reimbursement. ESDC’s obligation to disburse any City Funding Portion is conditioned upon, and subject to, ESDC receiving the amount of such City Funding Portion from NYCEDC pursuant to the City Funding Agreement; accordingly, ESDC will be under no obligation to disburse any part of the City Funding Portion to the Developer except when, and to the extent that, funds for such disbursement have been released and made available to ESDC by NYCEDC. In addition, the funding and disbursement of $15 million of the City Funding Portion is also subject to the satisfaction of certain requirements set forth in the City Funding Agreement, including, without limitation, certification to the effect that at least $100 million of Total Project Costs have been or will be incurred on or prior to the Funding Date during the Third Contribution Period. The funding and disbursement of the remaining $31 million of the City Funding Portion is also subject, without limitation, to the occurrence of the later of the issuance of the Series 2009 PILOT Bonds and the filing of a condemnation petition by ESDC.
(Emphases added)

Comments

  1. Norman,
    The bottom line is that this additional $31 million is money that was never confirmed before you discovered it. Correct?

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's unclear.

    I don't think "certain costs incurred and to be incurred in connection with acquisition of the Premises" signals spending on infrastructure.

    But Lombino is saying that it does.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…