Skip to main content

ESDC says it hopes to sell $650 million (not $531 million) in arena bonds even while Atlantic Yards appeal is pending

So, the projected amount of tax-exempt arena bonds would be larger than initially announced, indicating more savings for developer Forest City Ratner.

A New York Times article on July 1 stated:
The Court of Appeals' involvement, announced on Monday, is the latest hurdle to Mr. Ratner's plans to build a $772 million basketball arena, the centerpiece of the project. The developer and his bankers intend to sell about $650 million in bonds for the arena in late September.

That $650 million number was surprising, because, at the June 23 meeting of the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) board, a memo stated that tax-exempt arena financing was $531.1 million. (Right; click to enlarge)

The explanation

"The sizing of the tax-exempt and taxable financings is still in flux," ESDC spokesman Warner Johnston responded. "The $531 [million] number in our Board materials was a net number--exclusive of cost of issuance, capitalized interest, debt service reserve and bond insurance. In particular, the latter three are very big numbers. $650 [million] is a good ball park number for the tax exempt bond financing. The taxable piece will be relatively small (maybe $30-$50 million)."

Precise information will be released, he added, when the bond issue is finalized. Indeed, Footnote 1 attached to the board memo (above) states that the arena funding source is, in fact, net of cost of issuance, debt service reserve, and capitalized interest.

The only missing element among the four Johnston mentioned was bond insurance.

Was the board informed?

Was the ESDC informed that the total amount of tax-exempt bonds would be significantly more than $531.1 million. The board was presented only with the documents excerpted here, ESDC spokeswoman Elizabeth Mitchell confirmed: "If necessary, we will update the numbers for the Board at the next meeting, likely to be in September."

The issuer of the bonds would be the Brooklyn Arena Local Development Corporation (BALDC), and the BALDC board would authorize the bond sale.

"The LDC Board will be requested to authorize the bond issue, at which time numbers will be available," Mitchell said. "Neither ESDC nor the State will be liable on LDC bonds."

Would bonds be sold in September?

While the bond issue might be authorized in September, would bonds really be sold, as the Times article indicated, later that month, given that oral arguments in the eminent domain appeal wouldn't be held until mid-October?

Johnston wouldn't give a specific date: "We expect the bond sale to occur in 2009 and we hope to be able to sell bonds while the appeal is pending."

That could be dicey. I suspect that means that, should the questions and demeanor of the judges at the oral argument indicate they'd likely uphold the dismissal of the case, the bonds would then be marketed. I'd be surprised if the bonds would be sold before oral argument.

Another potential snag might come from the expected lawsuit against the Metropolitan Transportation Authority for its willingness to renegotiate the deal for the Vanderbilt Yard with Forest City Ratner. While such a lawsuit might not pose a legal roadblock to the bond sale, it could make investors pause--or add a risk premium to the sale.

Sale process

Before bonds can be issued, they must be authorized by the BALDC board and the bankers underwriting the deal must arrange for bond insurance and a rating for the bonds.

Comments

  1. Leaving out those three numbers is standard sports finance bait-and-switch, and its to the spokesman's credit that he clarified so quickly. The capitalized interest is required because the arena company will need to start servicing its debt right away during construction - before it starts making any money. So the arena company borrows the money needed to make these payments. The debt service reserve is designed to cope with any revenue shortfalls - like a late opening or some other kind of event that keeps the arena closed. So the company borrows another slug of money to sit there available for bondholders. The bond insurance I'm not so sure about. You can pay some of the premium up front, but mostly, like any other insured, you'll be paying month to month or quarter to quarter. But again, they will need to borrow enough to make bond insurance premiums until the stadium opens. Finally there is costs of issuance - basically lawyers', underwriters' and consultants' fees. That will be quite a large number too, depending on whether any of the litigation costs can be included in there. What I don't see anywhere is any indication that the FCR is going to get tax-exempt treatment for costs they were going to finance with taxable debt, so describing them as savings is probably not accurate. That said, providing a net financing amount number without building in financing costs is pretty misleading.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fwiw, the clarification came only after I queried them, just after the Times article appeared. It took a longer to get a few more details, hence my delay in publishing until now.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.