Skip to main content

ESDC claims AY will take just ten years (though Phase 2 and new railyard fuzzy); Brennan, Montgomery express dismay

Despite Empire State Development Corporation CEO Marisa Lago’s candid acknowledgment in April that Atlantic Yards would take “decades,” the revised Modified General Project Plan (GPP) to be released by the ESDC Tuesday will assert that the project would take just ten years, the timetable in previous construction documents, even though there’s no contractual requirement to meet the timetable.

Lago, who has resigned but hasn’t yet left her post, vigorously defended the plan at a briefing for local elected officials, held Friday at ESDC offices in Manhattan. ESDC officials asserted that project was essentially the same--thus not triggering a new environmental impact statement (EIS) or vote by the Public Authorities Control Board (PACB).

Develop Don’t Destroy Brooklyn has said it would sue regarding these issues.

Assemblyman Jim Brennan and state Senator Velmanette Montgomery, in interviews yesterday, both expressed dismay about the ESDC’s plans. Brennan said he didn’t find the timetable credible--”I think the project will limp along piecemeal”--and noted that some three-quarters of the project is “still subject to market conditions and further financing requirements.”

Brennan asserted that, given the Independent Budget Office’s estimate that the arena would be a money-loser for the city, the arena shouldn’t be built. (The arena’s Forest City Ratner’s priority, however, given losses in New Jersey and the potential for new revenues.)

Montgomery said she felt “very frustrated that the ESDC does not consider itself representing the people of this city and state” but rather serves as “an arm of the developer.”

Plan highlights

Among the highlights, eminent domain will proceed in two rather than one phases. At first it would be limited to the arena block and Block 1129, bounded by Carlton and Vanderbilt avenues and Dean and Pacific Streets, needed for construction staging, worker parking, and, ultimately, interim surface parking. (Site 5 and buildings on Atlantic Avenue in the middle block of the railyard, for example, would be spared initially.)

ESDC spokesman Warner Johnston told the New York Post that the staging of eminent domain will allow Ratner to "defer acquisitions costs"--in essence, paying for only the part of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard needed for the arena bock, then paying later for the rest. (Exactly when is unclear, though we should learn at today's MTA Finance Committee meeting.)

While there was discussion about whether ESDC would produce a new cost-benefit analysis--which, actually, was never a full cost-benefit analysis--it’s unclear how and when it will be made public.

The ESDC will hold two community meetings along with a public hearing, likely in July or August. The ESDC board, which on Tuesday is expected to “adopt” (the first stage in approval) the revised Modified GPP, is expected to vote in September on final approval.

(Still, the appeal in the eminent domain case may be pending.)

Tensions as meeting

In separate interviews, both Brennan and Montgomery were measured in their tone, though other sources told me that the meeting was somewhat heated, with two unnamed sources in the New York Post yesterday calling the project a "bait and switch" and saying there should be an investigation into whether the project would be rubber-stamped.

The Post article, which appeared mid-afternoon on the newspaper’s web site, did not, however, appear in print, a sign perhaps of an unwillingness to be seen as challenging the project. (Two weeks ago, however, a Post columnist got some ink to lament the loss of Frank Gehry.)

Besides ESDC staff, the other attendees were Assemblywoman Joan Millman and state Senator Bill Perkins (whose committee oversees corporations and authorities) and staffers for Montgomery, state Senator Eric Adams, Assemblyman Hakeem Jeffries, and City Council Members Letitia James and David Yassky.

Why the arena?

Brennan described the meeting as a “courtesy briefing,” without an opportunity or intention to grill the ESDC on details of the plans.

He said he suggested that, given that foregone property taxes for the arena would be used to pay off construction, “they should either drop the arena and just pursue a residential development or compel Ratner to pay property taxes.”

“There was not an immediate embrace of my proposal,” he said drily.

Inflated assessments?

The IBO reported concerns that the tax assessments on the arena block had risen rapidly, in what may be an attempt to ensure that the foregone revenues are high enough to deliver PILOTs (payments in lieu of taxes) sufficient to pay off the arena, and I followed up with some numbers.

Brennan, who heads the Assembly Committee on Cities, has joined Assemblyman Richard Brodsky, who chairs the Assembly Committee Corporations, Authorities, and Commissions, in looking into the curious jump in assessments on Yankee Stadium.

He called the issue in Brooklyn “an extremely serious concern” and said "I will be doing my utmost to get an accurate assessment” of the issue.

Brennan said his staff would research the issue.

Will there be an Assembly hearing?

Undetermined, Brennan said.

PACB role

Montgomery said that, while the changed deal with the MTA, seems like “a major change in the financing,” she’s troubled that the PACB need not weigh in.

She noted that the issues fall under the purview of Perkins’s committee--should the Democrats retain power in the deadlocked Senate--and “he wants to pursue this.”

Role of the public

Montgomery noted that, while the public hearing and public comment process ostensibly serve to gain public input, “I am not convinced that they will actually make changes.”

She contrasted Atlantic Yards to ESDC-overseen development in another part of her district, Hoyt and Schermerhorn streets.

In 1974, ESDC acquired three parcels of vacant land from the City of New York, but the plan was stalled, and, beginning in 1977, the agency leased the sites for short-term surface parking. In 1998, the Brooklyn Borough President's office organized a task force to study and recommend a plan, which has finally come to fruition.

In that case, Montgomery said, ESDC was partnering with the community in establishing the standards, then issuing an RFP to attract developers.

In this case, she noted the ESDC is partnering with the developer, which leads the project.

(There was never an ESDC RFP for the project site as a whole, though there was a belated RFP--18 months after AY project announcement--for the Vanderbilt Yard.)

“This is a huge development project, and the impact goes out a century,” she said, “ and there is absolutely no commitment to the community. I think it is an unacceptable position. Hopefully, that’s one of the things we can factor into reform of the ways authorities work.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.