Skip to main content

Quinn calls for task force to address housing crisis

In coverage yesterday of City Council Speaker Christine Quinn's State of the City speech, only the New York Sun, among the dailies, noticed her attention to the housing issue. In an article headlined Quinn Positions Herself For Mayoral Race, the Sun reported:
The biggest applause of the speech came when Ms. Quinn announced the creation of a task force that would recommend ways to expand the city's supply of middle-income housing and develop "a citywide Mitchell-Lama plan for the 21st century," as she put it.

..Asked about Ms. Quinn's new housing task force, [Manhattan Borough President Scott] Stringer said that while he was not sure if it would ultimately succeed, the city needed to look for ways to add more affordable housing units. "In our borough, right here in Manhattan, the housing crisis is now out of control," he said. "Somebody's got to step up with new ideas."

$110,000 and struggling?

Here are some excerpts from Quinn's speech:
Now, the single biggest complaint I hear from New Yorkers is the syrocketing cost of housing and the devastating impact it’s having on our middle class.
The reality is, if you are a teacher and firefighter, raising your kids in Clinton Hill and together make $110,000 a year, it’s hard to find a decent place to live.

Note that, under the guideline that people spend 30% of their income for affordable housing, the annual rent for such a household would be $33,000 and the monthly rent $2750. Also note that $110,000 is within the top range of households eligible for Atlantic Yards affordable housing.

Quinn is right that affordable housing is a challenge to many people. (Still, there are apartments in Clinton Hill well under $2750.) But Atlantic Yards was endorsed by the low-income group ACORN because its members thought it would help them.

Some progress

Quinn continued:
Talk about untenable. We can’t expect to keep a strong middle class here in New York or provide opportunities to immigrant families if we make the city literally uninhabitable for them.

...We have made some progress on this score. Last year, the Council passed several historic pieces of legislation to preserve and upgrade the limited supply of affordable housing we already have. And by the end of this month, we’ll pass Dan Garodnick and Melissa Mark Viverito’s antitenant harassment bill into law.

Also, the Mayor’s New Housing Marketplace and Commissioner Shaun Donovan are creating tens of thousand of new housing units. This year, to help ease the squeeze on working families who don't own their homes, we will continue our push to pass a Renter's Tax Credit. After all, it's only fair if we're going to give a rebate to homeowners to do the same for renters.

This refundable credit of three hundred dollars will give an immediate boost to more than one million New Yorkers.

It's worth noting that she spent more time on the renter's tax credit than praising the Bloomberg administration (or criticizing it).

New focus

She continued:
But if we are going to hold onto our middle class and those striving to join it for the long term, we have to expand our focus and even the definition of affordable housing.

What we really need, as many of you have heard me say before, is a City-wide Mitchell-Lama plan for the 21st Century – a comprehensive approach to creating housing that is affordable to our middle class and stays that way permanently.

One of our top priorities this year will be leveraging all the great expertise and energy across the city to help us develop just such a blueprint. We will convene a high-level task force and will charge them with coming back to us in six months with detailed and doable recommendations on how best to deal with this complex challenge.

...Our goal will be to unveil our next generation Mitchell-Lama plan this fall and to have the commitment and resources next year to begin implementing it. But in the short-term, we are going to look for realistic opportunities this year to make an immediate difference in increasing the supply of affordable housing.

New partnership

She continued:
One of our best allies in this fight has been and will always be the city’s unions and workers. They have a record of stepping up to help the city in tough times. Don’t forget, these were the same folks who offered up their pension funds during the 1970s and helped bail out our city. Today, to help make sure that we continue to preserve and expand affordable housing even in these challenging times, our Central Labor Council has committed to an innovative new partnership with the City Council.

The CLC will be forming a new non-profit organization – collaborating with its local unions – to use a combination of pension funds available through the AFL-CIO's Housing Trust Fund and private equity to expand the supply of housing available to middle-income New Yorkers. Together, we’ll identify housing at risk of being sold or deregulated and between the union's resources and the City’s leverage we'll make competitive bids that will keep tenants in their homes.

We’ll also partner with developers to build new middle-income housing – with the CLC providing financing and the City offering tax incentives.

Starrett City, the CLC, and ACORN

Interestingly, the CLC last year tried to buy Starrett City to capture the development from an investor opposed by affordable housing advocates, but ran into trouble with ACORN, because it thought the rents would be too high.

(Is the tension between low-income affordable housing and middle-income affordable housing what Quinn meant by expanding the definition of affordable housing?)

As the New York Observer reported last September:
But the labor council ran into resistance from Acorn, an affordable housing advocacy group, which objected to parts of the labor council’s future plans for the 5,881-unit complex, he said. Under those proposals, a copy of which was obtained by The Observer, nine-tenths of the tenants would be transferred to a federal program that would cap the rent they paid to 30 percent of their income. But once those tenants left or died off, just 30 percent of the apartments would be preserved for low- or very low-income residents; another 20 percent would be sold to tenants making up to $85,080 for a family of four.

That threshold struck housing advocates and elected officials as too high, particularly in the far-out stretches of Brooklyn, where the median income was a lot lower.

The median income of the folks who attended Atlantic Yards public hearings/meetings in search of housing was a lot lower, too, as ACORN's Bertha Lewis discovered at a July 2006 affordable housing information session.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…