Skip to main content

Down the EIS rabbit hole: Why does Fairway get counted for traffic impact but not Whole Foods?

Delving into the rabbit hole of traffic and transit projections for the Atlantic Yards project leads to a glaring discrepancy revealed only in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and not cited in the unsuccessful lawsuit challenging the AY environmental review.

The Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) belatedly added the new Fairway market in Red Hook to its list of sites that should be analyzed regarding future travel demand in the area around the Atlantic Yards site. However, the ESDC continued to exclude the coming Whole Foods Market in Gowanus because it was deemed "distant from study area."

That's absurd. As the graphic shows, Fairway is about twice as far as the Whole Foods site from the westernmost point of the Atlantic Yards footprint, the corner of Fourth, Flatbush, and Atlantic Avenues.

Any impact?

Would this have made a difference had it been included in the lawsuit? (The issue was not raised by post-FEIS commenters.) It's doubtful, given that Supreme Court Justice Joan Madden punted on addressing the dubious crime statistics in the suit. But it's another sign that the volumimous ESDC review, conducted by ubiquitous consultant AKRF, still contains glaring omissions obvious to the layperson.

A selective response to comments

In response to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, one Brooklyn resident raised the issue of Whole Foods, but the response was incomplete. See Comment 12-1 of the Response to Comments chapter of the Atlantic Yards FEIS:
Large projects such as the Brooklyn Bridge waterfront development and the expansion of the Red Hook Cruise Ship Terminal, IKEA in Red Hook, the new Fairway and the Whole Foods supermarket in Gowanus were not included. Large buildings such as those at 9 MetroTech, the new Federal Courthouse, and the Marriott Hotel Expansion were simply left out.

The ESDC's response:
In addition to background growth, the EIS transportation analyses include the travel demand from a total of 33 discrete No Build sites in and around the project site and Downtown Brooklyn that are expected to be developed by the proposed project’s 2016 analysis year. (For the 2010 analysis year, 14 discreet No Build sites were included.) These projects, which comprise approximately 6,254 dwelling units, 5.19 million sf of office space, 1.15 million sf of retail space and 2.43 million sf of other space (community facility, academic, hotel, court, etc.), include the anticipated development resulting from the Downtown Brooklyn Development project, Brooklyn Bridge Park, Pier 12, the new IKEA store in Red Hook, the Atlantic Center development, and the new Federal Courthouse and the Marriott Hotel expansion in Downtown Brooklyn. Three developments (a charter school on Waverly Avenue, residential development at 306-313 Gold Street, and the Fairway market in Red Hook) totaling 517 D.U. and 310,000 sf of office, retail and other space have been added to the transportation analyses in the FEIS in response to recent information and agency and public comments on the DEIS. Much of the additional development cited in the comments can be attributed to projects that (1) were completed prior to Fall 2005 and are therefore already reflected in the EIS 2006 traffic baseline condition; (2) fall below minimum threshold densities for inclusion as discrete No Build sites; (3) are distant from the Atlantic Yards project site (such as the Greenpoint-Williamsburg Rezoning project which includes sites located up to four miles from the project site); or (4) are speculative sites.
(Emphases added)

What about Whole Foods?

So why was Whole Foods excluded? It wasn't completed, nor too small, nor speculative. Rather, according to the background memo regarding "No Build" assumptions, Whole Foods would be "Distant from AY study area."
(Click to enlarge)

Though the distance is less than a mile, it's outside the study area, which was defined as "¾ mile of the project site," according to Chapter 2, Framework, of the FEIS.

However, Fairway is much farther away, so obviously "recent information and agency and public comments" caused some change in the ESDC's analysis. They just chose to be inconsistent when it came to Whole Fods.

Fair comparison?

Yes, Fairway is bigger, with nearly 120,000 square feet of retail, plus 91,500 square feet of office space, while Whole Foods would have 46,000 square feet, according to the FEIS memo. (Whole Foods says 52,000 sf.)

But the 60,500 sf Pathmark in the Atlantic Center mall already generates a lot of traffic. And Whole Foods, for now would have a bigger parking lot than Fairway. It recently rejected a request to reduce its 420-space parking lot, leaving it more than one-third larger than Fairway's 300-space lot.

So it's hard to disregard Whole Foods.


Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

So, Forest City has some property subject to the future Gowanus rezoning

Writing yesterday, MAP: Who Owns All the Property Along the Gowanus Canal, DNAinfo's Leslie Albrecht lays out the positioning of various real estate players along the Gowanus Canal, a Superfund site:
As the city considers whether to rezone Gowanus and, perhaps, morph the gritty low-rise industrial area into a hot new neighborhood of residential towers (albeit at a fraction of the height of Manhattan's supertall buildings), DNAinfo reviewed property records along the canal to find out who stands to benefit most from the changes.
Investors have poured at least $440 million into buying land on the polluted waterway and more than a third of the properties have changed hands in the past decade, according to an examination of records for the nearly 130 properties along the 1.8-mile canal. While the single largest landowner is developer Property Markets Group, other landowners include Kushner Companies, Alloy Development, Two Trees, and Forest City New York.

Forest City's plans unc…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…